Objective To compare the effectiveness of cortical bone trajectory screw (CBTS) and conventional pedicle screw for posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in the treatment of single segment lumbar degenerative disease. Methods Between May 2013 and May 2016, a total of 97 patients with single segment lumbar degenerative disease were treated with PLIF. Fifty-one patients were fixed with CBTS in PLIF (trajectory screw group) and 46 with pedicle screw (pedicle screw group). There was no significant difference in age, gender, body mass index, preoperative diagnosis, lesion segment, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Oswestry dysfunction index (ODI) between 2 groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, bed rest time, length of hospital stay, serum creatine kinase (CK) concentration, total amount of diclofenac sodium, perioperative complications, ODI, VAS score, and interbody fusion rate were recorded and compared between 2 groups. Results All patients were followed up 12 months. The patients in trajectory screw group had a significantly less operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, and serum CK concentration when compared with the patients in pedicle screw group (P<0.05). Thirty-five patients (68.6%) in trajectory screw group and 46 patients (100%) in pedicle screw group were given diclofenac sodium within 48 hours after operation, showing significant difference between 2 groups (χ2=89.334, P=0.000). There was no significant difference in the incidence of perioperative complications between trajectory screw group and pedicle screw group (3.9% vs. 8.7%, P=0.418). There was no significant difference in the VAS score, ODI, and interbody fusion rate at 12 months after operation between 2 groups (P>0.05). Conclusion For the single segment degenerative lumbar disease, the use of CBTS or conventional pedicle screw for PLIF can obtain satisfactory clinical function and interbody fusion rate. But the former has the advantages of less blood loss, less intraoperative muscle damage, less perioperative pain, shorter length of hospital stay and bed rest time.
Objective To introduce operation skill of the spinal wedge osteotomy by posterior approach for correction of severe rigid scol iosis and to discuss the selection of the indications and the range of fusion and fixation. Methods Between July 1999 and January 2009, 23 patients with severe rigid scol iosis were treated with spinal wedge osteotomy by posterior approach, including 16 congenital scol iosis, 5 idiopathic scol iosis, and 2 neurofibromatosis scol iosis. There were 11 males and 12 females with a median age of 15 years (range, 8-29 years). Two patients had previous surgery history. The Cobb’s angles of scol iosis and kyphosis before operation were (85.39 ± 13.51)° and (56.78 ± 17.69)°, respectively. The mean spinal flexibil ity was 14.4% (range, 4.7%-22.5%). The trunk shift was (15.61 ± 4.89) mm. The preoperative CT or MRI showed bony septum in the canal in 2 patients. Results The mean operative time was 241 minutes and the mean blood loss was 1 452 mL. The average fused vertebrae were 10.7 segaments (range, 8-14 segaments). The follow-up ranged from 1 to 4 years with an average of 2 years and 6 months. The postoperative Cobb’s angle of scol iosis was (38.70 ± 6.51)°, the average correction rate was 54.7%. The postoperative Cobb’s angle of kyphosis was (27.78 ± 6.01)°, the average correction rate was 51.0%. The trunk shift was improved to (4.69 ± 1.87) mm, the increased height was 5.2 cm on average (range, 2.8-7.7 cm). The Cobb’s angle of scol iosis was (41.57 ± 6.80)° with an average 2.9° loss of correction at the final follow-up; the Cobb’s angle of kyphosis was (30.39 ± 5.94)° with an average 2.6° loss of correction at the final follow-up; the trunk shift was (4.78 ± 2.00) mm at the final follow-up. There were significant differences (P lt; 0.05) in the Cobb’s angles of scol iosis and kyphosis and the trunk shift between preoperation and postoperation, between preoperation and last follow-up. Four cases had pedicle fracture, 1 had L1 nerve root injury, 2 had superior mesenteric artery syndrome, 1 had exudates of incision, and 2 had temporary dysfunction of both lower extremity. Conclusion Spinal wedge osteotomy by posterior approach is a rel iable and safe surgical technique for correcting severe rigid scol iosis. With segmental pedical screw fixation, both the spinal balance and stabil ity can be restored.