ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of open reduction of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) avulsion fracture at tibial insertion of knee joint with absorbable screws fixation and absorbable screw combined with suture anchor fixation. Methods The clinical data of 26 patients with PCL avulsion fracture at tibial insertion who met the selection criteria between March 2015 and October 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 14 patients were fixed with simple absorbable screw (group A), and 12 patients were fixed with absorbable screw combined with suture anchors (group B). All patients were confirmed by X-ray film, CT, or MRI preoperatively, and got positive results in preoperative posterior drawer tests. There was no significant difference in gender, age, side of affected limb, time from injury to operation, comorbidities, and preoperative Meyers & McKeever classification, Lysholm score, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time and postoperative complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. At last follow-up, Lysholm score and IKDC score were used to evaluate the improvement of knee function. ResultsThere was no significant difference in operation time between the two groups (P>0.05). All incisions healed by first intention, and no complication such as vascular and nerve injury or venous thrombosis occurred. All 26 patients were followed up 9-89 months, with an average of 55.3 months. The follow-up time of group A and group B was (55.7±23.2) and (56.8±29.3) months, respectively, with no significant difference (t=−0.106, P=0.916). Radiographs showed bone healing in both groups at 3 months after operation, and no complication such as infection and traumatic arthritis occurred. At last follow-up, the posterior drawer test was negative in both groups, and the Lysholm score and IKDC score significantly improved when compared with the pre-operative values (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the improvement value between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionFor PCL avulsion fracture at tibial insertion of the knee joint, the open reduction and absorbable screw combined with suture anchor fixation can achieve reliable fracture reduction and fixation, which is conducive to the early rehabilitation and functional exercise, and the postoperative functional recovery of the knee joint is satisfactory.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the complications of knee arthroscopic surgeries in China.MethodsWe searched PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP databases to collect cross-sectional studies on the complications of knee arthroscopic surgeries in China from inception to March 1st, 2019. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed by using Stata 12.0 software.ResultsA total of 36 studies involving 20 740 cases were included. The results of meta-analysis showed the incidence rate of complication in knee arthroscopic surgeries in China was 9.71% (95%CI 8.20% to 11.23%). Subgroup analysis showed that the complication incidence rates in the eastern, central and western regions were 10.04% (95%CI 8.00% to 12.14%), 9.67% (95%CI 6.57% to 12.76%) and 7.47% (95%CI 6.20% to 8.73%). The complication incidence rates in the upper first-class and non-upper first-class hospitals were 9.50% (95%CI 7.83% to 11.17%) and 10.95% (95%CI 6.75% to 15.14%). The top 3 complication types with highest incidence rate included joint effusion［2.16% (95%CI 1.44% to 2.87%)］, accidental injury of native structures［1.49% (95%CI 0.96% to 2.03%)］ and hemorrhage［1.43% (95%CI 1.01% to 1.84%)］. Other severe complications including neurovascular injury, thrombosis diseases and infection were 0.06% (95%CI 0.02% to 0.11%), 0.33% (95%CI 0.19% to 0.48%) and 0.08% (95%CI 0.03% to 0.13%).ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that the complication incidence rate of arthroscopic surgeries in China is relatively high and the complication type is complex and varied. Due to the quantity and quality of the included studies, more high-quality studies are required to verify the above conclusions in future.
ObjectiveTo review research progress in the anterolateral ligament (ALL) of knee, and provide a clinical reference for diagnosis and treatment of ALL injury.MethodsThe literature on the diagnosis and treatment of ALL injury was widely reviewed. The incidence, anatomy, biomechanics, injury mechanism, and treatment status of ALL were summarized.ResultsThe ALL contributes to the effect of controlling the internal rotation and anterior translation of the tibia, which affects the axial migration of the knee. ALL injury can be diagnosed according to the signs and MRI examination. Currently, no consensus exists for the surgical indications of ALL injury, but most surgeons tend to perform ALL reconstruction in patients requiring anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction or revision surgery with higher pivot-shift tests. At present, various techniques have been used for ALL reconstruction, and there is no optimal technique. In addition, the long-term effectiveness of ALL reconstruction is unclear due to the lack of high-quality studies and long-term postoperative follow-up.ConclusionThe ALL contributes to maintaining knee stability, and the ALL reconstruction technique and its effectiveness still need further research.