west china medical publishers
Author
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Author "ZHANG Tingting" 2 results
  • Clinical DiagnosticValue of Soluble Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid Cells-1 in Ventilator- Associated Pneumonia

    Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 ( sTREM-1 ) in endotracheal aspirate and plasma of patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia ( VAP) . Methods The consentration of sTREM-1 in plasma and endotracheal aspirate, and serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein ( hs-CRP) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay ( ELISA) in 68 patients with VAP ( VAP group) , 50 patients underwent ventilation without VAP ( non-VAP group) , and 50 healthy individuals ( control group) . The sensitivity and specificity of each parameter were calculated. Results In the patients with VAP, sTREM-1 in plasma and endotracheal aspirate before treatment were significantly higher than that in the non-VAP group [ ( 143.62 ±46.82) pg/mL vs. ( 68.56 ±16.24) pg/mL, ( 352.86 ±92.57) pg/mL vs. ( 126.21 ±42.28) pg/mL, Plt;0.05] ; sTREM-1 in plasma and endotracheal aspirate on the 3rd and the 7th day during treatment were significantly decreased ( Plt;0. 05) . By ROC analysis, the cut-off value of sTREM-1 in endotracheal aspirate were 193.64 pg/mL, with sensitivity and specificity of 93.84% and 89.51% respectively. The areas under ROC curve of sTREM-1 in endotracheal aspirate were 0.912. Clinical diagnostic value of sTREM-1 in endotracheal aspirate was better than plasma sTREM-1 and serum hs-CRP ( areas under ROC curve were 0. 768 and 0. 704 respectively) . Conclusions sTREM-1 may be helpful for evaluating the therapeutic effect in patients with VAP. The diagnostic value of sTREM-1 in endotracheal aspirate may be superior to plasma sTREM-1 and serum hs-CRP.

    Release date:2016-09-13 04:00 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Comparative Study of the Clinical Effect between Docetaxel-based Three and Two Drugs Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Patients after Radical Gastrectomy

    目的 观察多西他赛三药及两药联合对胃癌根治术后辅助化学疗法(化疗)的疗效比较及不良反应。 方法 回顾性分析解放军总医院2006年1月-2011年12月42 例胃癌根治术后患者的临床资料,其中有22例、20例患者分别接受以多西他赛为基础的三药、两药联合辅助化疗。三药联合:多西他赛注射液+铂类+氟尿嘧啶/卡培他滨片/替吉奥;两药联合:多西他赛注射液+氟尿嘧啶/卡培他滨片/替加氟或多西他赛注射液+铂类;主要观察终点:无疾病生存期(DFS),次要观察终点:预后因素分析、复发转移情况、不良反应及亚组分析。 结果 两组中位DFS分别为9.530、7.170个月(P=0.646);性别、年龄、肿瘤浸润深度、脉管癌栓、淋巴结清扫范围是患者早期复发转移的不良预后因素,三药联合组肝转移率高于两药联合组(P=0.008);主要不良反应为恶心、呕吐、白细胞减少、腹泻、脱发、血小板减少等,多为1~2级,可耐受,三药联合组较两药联合组易出现不良反应(P=0.011),以恶心、呕吐为主。 结论 胃癌根治术后以多西他赛为基础的辅助化疗三药、两药联合对患者疗效及预后无明显差异,且两种辅助疗法不良反应基本可耐受。

    Release date:2016-09-07 02:34 Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content