Objective To analyze the effect of monitoring and modulating the portal vein pressure and blood flow during living donor liver transplantation （LDLT） on preventing small-for-size-syndrome (SFSS). Methods Data of forty-four LDLT recipients between Oct.2007 and Oct.2008 were reviewed. Actual graft-to-recipient weight ratio（GRWR）, portal vein flow and pressure during operation and syndrome of SFSS after operation were recorded. The patients received splenectomy or splenic artery ligation according to actual GRWR, portal vein flow and pressure and WBC. Relationships between patients’ GRWR, portal vein flow, portal vein pressure and occurrence of SFSS were analyzed. Results Six patients received splenectomy and 7 patients received splenic artery ligation to decrease the portal vein flow and pressure during the operation. The portal vein flow and pressure decreased after splenectomy （Plt;0.05）. The portal vein pressure decreased （Plt;0.05） and the portal vein flow had no significant change after splenic artery ligation （P＞0.05）. No SFSS occurred after operation. Conclusion Modulation of portal vein flow and pressure by splenectomy or splenic artery ligation during LDLT operation can decrease the portal vein flow and pressure, and which can prevent the incidence of SFSS.
ObjectiveTo explore the safety and effectiveness of Taylor spatial frame (TSF) in the treatment of medial compartmental osteoarthritis (MCOA) of the knee and the adjustment of the lower extremity force line at the same time.MethodsThe clinical data of 30 patients with MCOA who underwent high tibial osteotomy (HTO) between October 2016 and April 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different fixation methods, they were divided into external fixation group (TSF external fixation, 16 cases) and internal fixation group (locking steel plate internal fixation, 14 cases). There was no significant difference between the two groups in gender, age, side, disease duration, mechanical femur tibia angle (MFTA), and other general data (P>0.05). The operation time and intraoperative blood loss of the two groups were recorded and compared; MFTA was used to evaluate the recovery of the lower extremity force line at last follow-up; Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score was used to evaluate the clinical effecacy before operation and at 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months after operation.ResultsThe operation time and intraoperative blood loss of external fixation group were significantly less than those of internal fixation group (P<0.05). All patients were followed up 9-16 months, with an average of 12 months. There were 2 cases of delayed healing in the internal fixation group and 1 case of delayed healing in the external fixation group, and all healed after symptomatic treatment. All patients in the two groups had no complication such as needle infection, nonunion at osteotomy, osteomyelitis, and so on. At last follow-up, MFTA standard was used to evaluate the recovery of force line. The results of external fixation group were all excellent, while the results of internal fixation group were excellent in 10 cases and good in 4 cases. The difference between the two groups was significant (Z=–2.258, P=0.024). The HSS scores in the two groups were significantly improved at each time point after operation, and gradually improved with time after operation (P<0.05). The HSS score of the external fixation group was significantly higher than that of the internal fixation group (t=2.425, P=0.022) at 3 months after operation; and there was no significant difference between the two groups at other time points (P>0.05).ConclusionTSF has unique advantages in HTO treatment of MCOA patients and correction of lower extremity force line, such as shorter operation time, less bleeding, firm fixation, and less complications. It can accurately adjust the lower extremity force line after operation and has good effectiveness. It is an effective and safe fixation method.