ObjectiveTo evaluate the effects of combined TACE and PVC regarding the survival and diseasefree survival rate in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. MethodsThe relevant articles were searchd by a database search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) Databases, Web of Science, Sciencedirect, National Institute of Health Clinical Trials Database, CNKI, WANFANG Database, and VIP Database. The analysis of the data was performed using Revman 5.1 Software. ResultsBy searching and selecting, a total of ten articles met the inclusion criteria, of which 6 were in the postoperative group, and 4 were in the no-operative group. There were no statistical significance of heterogeneity in each group through subgroup analyzed. The pooled OR showed that combined TACE and PVC could significantly increase the 1-, 2-, and/or 3-year survival and disease-free survival rates compared with TACE alone for HCC patients. The pooled OR and 95% CI of the 1-, 2-and/or 3-year survival and disease-free survival rate, respectively, were as follows:In operative group, 1-year disease-free survival rate 2.09, 1.21-3.61; 3-year disease-free survival rate 3.62, 1.88-6.97; 1-year survival rate 2.25, 1.30-3.87; 3-year survival rate 1.96, 1.20-3.21. In no-perative group:1-year survival rate 3.90, 2.33-6.54; 2-year survival rate 5.30, 1.87-15.06. Conlusions Compared with TACE alone, postoperative adjuvant combined TACE and PVC can significantly increase the 1-, and 3-year survival and disease-free survival rates. For no-perative group, adjuvant combined TACE and PVC can significantly increase the 1-, and 2-year survival rates. Based on the limitations of this meta-analysis (this article is included in the high quality literature less), clinicians should be cautious by using our findings.
ObjectiveTo understand the current situation in the treatment of hepatic echinococcosis. MethodThe literatures about operation treatment, drug treatment, and the clinical pathway of hepatic echinococcosis were reviewed. ResultsCurrently, with the continuous development of surgical techniques and the application of minimally invasive surgery, the operative treatments of hepatic echinococcosis had made a great progress, it was still the preferred treatment for the disease. Liver transplantation was made as the final choice. The use of aspiration, sclerotherapy or interventional technique brought a hope for patients intolerant to laparotomy. Moreover, chemotherapy drugs, Chinese herbal medicine, and drug combinations also achieved a very good effect in the treatment of hepatic echinococcosis. The clinical pathway provided a good direction for the treatment of hepatic echinococcosis. ConclusionFor the treatment of hepatic echinococcosis various, we should choice a reasonable treatment according to the specific circumstances of patients, to achieve the best therapeutic effect with minimal trauma.
ObjectiveTo compare the effect and safety between laparoscopic versus laparotomy D2 radical gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. MethodsTwo hundred and seventeen patients with advanced gastric cancer who were treated in our hospital from March 2011 to March 2014 were selected as research objects. According to surgical method, they were divided into laparoscopy group (103 patients received laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy) and laparotomy group (114 patients received laparotomy D2 radical gastrectomy). Comparison of the surgical effect-related indicators between 2 groups was performed. ResultsIn the aspect of intra-operative indicators:the operation time, proximal margin length, distal margin length, and the number of removal lymph node between the 2 groups did not significantly differed with each other (P>0.05); while the bleeding volume and the length of incision in laparoscopy group were significantly less (shorter) than those of laparotomy group (P<0.05). In the aspect of post-operative indicators:the time to first flatus, time to resumed oral intake, time to ambulation, post-operative hospital stay, time of analgesics given, and the total incidence of postoperative complication in laparoscopy group were significantly shorter (less or lower) than those of laparotomy group (P<0.05), the operating cost in laparoscopy group was significantly higher than that of the laparotomy group (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in total treatment cost, mortality of gastric cancer, and recurrence or metastasis rate between the 2 groups (P>0.05). ConclusionsBoth laparoscopic and laparotomy D2 radical gastrectomy in treatment of advanced gastric cancer can obtain good clinical effect. But compared with laparotomy D2 radical gastrectomy, laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy can reduce operative wound, reduce incidence of complications, improve postoperative recovery, and has higher safety.