ObjectiveTo investigate the curative effects of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyper-thermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for treating the hepatocellular carcinoma with peritoneal metastasis. MethodsThe clinical data of 80 cases of hepatocellular carcinoma with peritoneal metastasis who were treated in our hospital from January 2004 to January 2012 were collected, and were classified into observation group (n=40) and control group (n=40) according to the treatment. Case of observation group received CRS+HIPEC, and cases of control group received CRS+conventional intraperitoneal injection of chemotherapy. Then the comparison of clinical effect and prog-nosis was performed. ResultsIn observation group, the results of completeness of cytoreduction (CC) grade was:31 cases in grade 0, 6 cases in grade 1, and 3 cases in grade 2. In control group, the results of CC grade was:32 cases in grade 0, 6 cases in grade 1, and 2 cases in grade 3. There was no significant difference between 2 groups in the CC grade (P=0.213). In addition, there were no significant differences between observation group and control group in operation time (6.8 hours vs. 6.5 hours), hospital stay (17.3 days vs.18.7 days), and incidence of adverse reactions[70.0% (28/40) vs. 60.0% (24/40)], P>0.05. All of the cases of observation group and control group were followed up for 10-61 months (average of 42.5 months) and 6-49 months (average of 30.2 months) respectively. During the follow up period, in observation group, there were 18 cases died, 12 cases suffered from recurrence, 5 cases suffered from metastasis, and the rest of 5 cases survived; in the control group, there were 26 cases died, 9 cases suffered from recurrence, and 5 cases suffered from metastasis. However, the survival situation was better in observation group than that of control group (P<0.01). ConclusionCombining CRS and HIPEC for treating hepatocellular carcinoma with peritoneal metastasis was safe and effective, which would be widely applied.
Objective?To explore the clinical and imaging features of cranial venous sinus thrombosis (CVST). MethodsThe clinical data of 20 patients with CVST treated between January 2008 and December 2012 were retrospectively analyzed, including the clinical manifestations, neuroimaging characters and treatment outcomes. ResultsAmong the 20 patients, there were 10 infected cases; D-dimer was detected positively in only 2 cases; cerebrospinal fluid pressure increased in 13 patients; and red blood cell population of cerebrospinal fluid increased in 12 patients. The common clinical symptoms included headache in 16 cases, eye symptoms in 12 cases, and vomiting in 10 cases. CT showed the direct signs of CVST in 3 cases, and MRI showed the direct signs of CVST in 6 cases. The common disease regions were in left transverse sinus and sigmoid sinus in 5 cases, superior sagittal sinus in 5 cases, and multiple venous sinus in 5 cases. Eighteen patients only received anticoagulation, and 2 received anticoagulation and local thrombolytic treatment. Fourteen cases recovered fully, 6 had dysfunctions. ConclusionThe clinical manifestations of CVST are nonspecific. This disorder predominantly affects childbearing women. Infection is a common cause of CVST. The occlusive venous sinus can be confirmed by enhanced magnetic resonance venography or digital subtraction angiography. Anticoagulation and local thrombolytic therapy are both proved to be safe and effective in the treatment of CVST. The early diagnosis rate of CVST remains to be improved.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of peginterferon alpha (PEG-IFNα) initially combined with lamivudine (LAM) or adefovir (ADV) in treatment of HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. MethodsWe electronically searched databases including The Cochrane Library (Issue 11, 2014), PubMed, CBM, CNKI, VIP, and WanFang Data from inception to December 2014, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about PEG-IFNα initially combined with LAM or ADV for HBeAg-positive CHB. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.2 software. ResultsA total of 11 RCTs involving 2031 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: After 48 weeks of treatment, the HBsAg seroconversion rate of the PEG-IFNα plus ADV group was significantly higher than that of the PEG-IFNα monotherapy group (8.6% vs. 0%, OR=7.73, 95%CI 1.53 to 39.05, P=0.01) or the ADV monotherapy group (8.5% vs. 0%, OR=7.75, 95%CI 1.07 to 56.23, P=0.04); and the HBsAg seroclearance rate in the combination therapy group was significantly higher than that of the ADV monotherapy group (10.5% vs. 1.2%, OR=5.56, 95%CI to 2.14 to 14.47, P=0.0004). After 52 weeks of treatment, the HBsAg seroconversion rate of the PEG-IFNα plus LAM group was significantly higher than that of the PEG-IFNα monotherapy group (11.6% vs. 5.6%, OR=2.21, 95%CI 1.04 to 4.72, P=0.04). After 26 weeks of follow-up, no significant differences were found between the combination therapy group and the PEG-IFNα monotherapy group in HBsAg seroclearance rate and HBsAg seroconversion rate (all P values >0.05). ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that, compared with PEG-IFNα, LAM, or ADV monotherapy, PEG-IFNα plus LAM or ADV could improve the HBsAg seroclearance or seroconversion rate after 48-52 weeks of treatment for HBeAg-positive CHB, but this effect is still limited. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the differential diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) for renal solid space-occupying lesions. MethodsDatabases including EMbase, PubMed, The Cochrane Library (Issue 11, 2014), CNKI, CBM, VIP and WanFang Data were searched for diagnostic tests about CEUS and CECT for renal solid space-occupying lesions from inception to September, 2014. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed using Meta-Disc 1.4 software. ResultsA total of 13 studies involving 754 specimens were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that:the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio (combined effect and its 95%CI) in the CEUS group were 0.96 (95%CI 0.94 to 0.97), 0.77 (95%CI 0.70 to 0.83), 3.82 (95%CI 2.93 to 4.97), 0.06 (95%CI 0.04 to 0.10), 64.33 (95%CI 36.79 to 112.51), and in the CECT group were 0.84 (95%CI 0.81 to 0.87), 0.73 (95%CI 0.65 to 0.79), 2.81 (95%CI 2.22 to 3.56), 0.23 (95%CI 0.16 to 0.34), 13.85 (95%CI 6.79 to 28.26). There were significant differences between the CEUS group (0.960 8, 95%CI 0.927 3 to 0.994 3) and the CECT group (0.866 8, 95%CI 0.788 8 to 0.944 8) in the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve (P<0.05). The similar results were observed in cases with small renal tumors≤4 cm (AUC:0.973 7 vs. 0.861 3, P<0.05). ConclusionCEUS has higher differential diagnostic value than CECT for renal solid space-occupying lesions.