目的:探讨经导管肝动脉灌注化疗栓塞(TACE)与TACE联合三维适形放射治疗(TACE + 3DCRT)原发性肝细胞癌(HCC)的疗效.方法:随机分成两组的HCC患者,均不能手术、门脉无癌栓、无远处脏器转移。50例患者行单纯TACE 2次(TACE组)。40例患者在TACE 2次后第四周再行三维适形放射治疗(TACE + 3DCRT组),放疗采用6MVX射线,4～6 Gy/次,隔日一次,3次/周,总剂量45～60 Gy。TACE采用碘化油、顺铂、5氟尿嘧啶、表阿霉素及明胶海绵。结果:TACE组与TACE+3DCRT组近期疗效有效率(完全缓解+部分缓解)分别为68.0%(34/50)、87.5%(35/40),1年生存率分别为78.0%(39/50)、95.0%(38/40),两组差异均有统计学意义(Plt;0.05)。TACE的治疗反应主要为栓塞综合征,3DCRT有7.5%(3/40)发生急性放射性肝炎,经对症、保肝处理后缓解。两组患者均能耐受。结论:TACE + 3DCRT治疗不能手术、门脉无癌栓、无远处脏器转移的HCC的疗效较单纯TACE治疗HCC的疗效好。
【摘要】 目的 探讨后程适形放射治疗（3 dimensional comformal radiation therapy，3D-CRT）同步化学疗法治疗Ⅲ期非小细胞肺癌（non-small-cell lung cancer，NSCLC）的近期疗效。 方法 搜集2005年1月-2008年6月NSCLC患者共115例，其中53例行单纯后程3D-CRT（单放组），62例行后程3D-CRT联合同步化学疗法（联合组），所有患者均经病理证实为Ⅲ期NSCLC。两组放射治疗方案均采用常规分割治疗加后程3D-CRT，DT 62～72 Gy。联合组化学疗法采用TP（紫杉醇 + 顺铂）方案。 结果 单放组和联合组近期疗效（完全缓解+部分缓解）分别为75.47%、91.94%，差异有统计学意义（Plt;0.05）。单放组和联合组的治疗不良反应主要有白细胞、血小板减少，放射性食管炎，放射性气管炎，恶心、呕吐等胃肠道反应。骨髓抑制和消化道反应，联合组稍高于单放组。经对症治疗后，所有患者均可耐受。 结论 后程3D-CRT联合TP方案化学疗法较单纯后程适形放射治疗明显提高Ⅲ期NSCLC近期疗效。患者耐受性尚可。【Abstract】 Objective To observe the recent therapeutic effect of late course 3 dimensional conformal therapy concomitant with chemotherapy on locally advanced stage Ⅲ non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods From January 2005 to June 2008, 115 patients with stage Ⅲ NSCLC were confirmed by pathology, in whom 53 only underwent late course conformal therapy (radiotherapy group), and another 62 underwent late course conformal therapy concomitant with chemotherapy (combined group). The radiotherapy schema of the two groups was routine division plus late course conformal therapy (with DT 62-72 Gy). The chemotherapy schema in the combined group was performed with TP (paclitaxel and DDP). Results The recent curative effect (complete remission plus partial remission) in radiotherapy group and combined group was 75.47% and 91.94%, respectively (Plt;0.05). The frequent adverse reactions in the two groups included leucocytopenia, thrombocytopenia, radioactive esophagitis, radioactive tracheitis, nauseated, and emesia. The rate of bone marrow depression and alimentary canal reaction in combined group was higher than that in the radiotherapy group. In the two groups, all patients could tolerance the treatments. Conclusion Late course 3 dimensional conformal therapy concomitant with TP schema chemotherapy for NSCLC could raise the recent curative effect. The patients could tolerance the treatments.
【摘要】 目的 探讨瑞舒伐他汀对慢性肾病患者抗炎疗效。 方法 选取2009年11月-2010年12月90例慢性肾病患者，随机分为A、B两组，A组50例，给予瑞舒伐他汀钙10 mg/d；B组40例，给予阿托伐他汀钙10 mg/d，两组患者的年龄和性别相匹配。分别测定其治疗前及治疗后12周时血白细胞、高敏反应蛋白、纤维蛋白原、白介素-6、肿瘤坏死因子-α。 结果 两组治疗前各炎症指标水平差异无统计学意义（Pgt;0.05）。与治疗前相比，两组患者治疗12周后炎症指标水平均较前明显下降（Plt;0.01），瑞舒伐他汀钙组比阿托伐他汀钙组炎症指标下降更为明显。 结论 瑞舒伐他汀可有效改善慢性肾病患者的炎症反应。【Abstract】 Objective To explore the anti-inflammatory effect of rosuvastatin on chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Methods Ninety CKD patients treated in our hospital between November 2009 and December 2010 were randomly divided into two groups. One group was given rosuvastatin calcium 10 mg/d, which the other group was given atorvastatin calcium 10 mg/d. The two groups matched in terms of age and gender. We determined blood leukocyte (WBC), high sensitivity reactive protein (hs-CRP), fibrinogen (FIG), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) of the patients before and after treatment for 12 weeks. Results The inflammatory marker levels of both groups before treatment had no significant difference (Pgt;0.05). The inflammatory marker levels of two groups after treatment for 12 weeks were significantly decreased compared with the levels before treatment (Plt;0.01), and rosuvastatin calcium group decreased more apparently than atorvastatin calcium group. Conclusion Rosuvastatin can improve the anti-inflammatory response in CKD patients.
ObjectiveTo explore the characteristics of blood pressure variability (BPV) in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients with and without diabetes mellitus and the effects of BPV on cardiac function based on the research of clinical data. MethodsOne hundred MHD patients treated in the Hemodialysis Center of the People’s Hospital of Taixing City between January 2013 and January 2015 were recruited and divided into diabetes group (n=46) and non-diabetes group (n=54). Interdialytic and intradialytic BPV and cardiac function were monitored and compared between the two groups. Standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV) were used for the evaluation of BPV. ResultsTriacylglycerol, cholesterol and plasma albumin were significantly different between the diabetes group and non-diabetes group (P<0.05), while hemoglobin, serum calcium, phosphorus and parathyroid hormone were not significantly different between the two groups (P>0.05). Forty-two patients in the diabetes group and 53 in the non-diabetes group took antihypertensive drugs. The varieties of antihypertensive drugs and the proportion of patients who used antihypertensive drugs were not significantly different between the two groups. The ambulatory blood pressure monitoring displayed 40 patients (86.9%) with reverse dipper or non-dipper blood pressure in the diabetes group and 35 (64.8%) in the non-diabetes group, and the difference was significant (P<0.05). The interdialytic mean systolic blood pressure (SBP), SBP-SD and SBP-CV in the diabetes group were all significantly higher than those in the non-diabetes group (P<0.05), and the mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP), DBP-SD and DBP-CV were also significantly different between the two groups (P<0.05). The intradialytic mean SBP, SBP-SD and SBP-CV in the diabetes group were significantly higher than those in the non-diabetes group (P<0.05), but there were no significant differences in intradialytic mean DBP, DBP-SD and DBP-CV between the two groups. In patients with reverse dipper or non-dipper blood pressure, the interventricular septal thickness, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter and ejection fraction were significantly different between the diabetes group and the non-diabetes group. However, in patients with dipper blood pressure, the cardiac function parameters were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion MHD patients with diabetes have higher ratio of reverse dipper or non-dipper blood pressure, more significant blood pressure variability and more severe cardiac function damage.