This article briefly introduces the status and problems of research and application on medical professionalism in China; proposes the concept of translational medicine and the challenges of introduction of translational medicine to physician professionalism research and translation. Some measurements or approaches to promote research translation on medical professionalisms are proposed to shorten the distance from research outcomes to practical application, in order to carry out evidence-based construction of modern medical professionalism of Chinese characteristics and build a harmonious doctor-patient relationship.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the effectiveness, safety and ethics of Da Vinci Surigcal System (dVSS)in the field of cardiothoracic surgery, and provide evidence for its clinical application. MethodsWe searched VIP, CNKI, WanFang Database, CBM, official website of National Health and Family Planning Commission of People's Republic of China, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, WHO ICTRP search portal, ClinicalTrials.gov, Chinese Clinical Trial Registration Center, Australian-New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry and ISRCTN to collect clinical trials of dVSS for thoracic and cardiovascular diseases to evaluate its effectiveness, safety and ethics. The search time was from the establishment of each database to January 2014. The quality of included literatures was evaluated by Grades of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). ResultsA total of 31 studies were identified including 4 case control studies and 27 retrospective studies involving 1 037 patients. The quality of included literatures was all very low. dVSS had been widely used in cardiothoracic surgery including coronary artery bypass grafting, valvuloplasty or valve replacement, thoracic tumor resection, etc. Compared with conventional surgery and thoracoscopy, the safety and effectiveness of dVSS was good, while its economic burden was heavier for the patients. dVSS could benefit patients and improve clinical level of cardiothoracic surgery. The disciplines and qualification of dVSS application was legal, but the maturity of its clinical use needed improvement, and relevant measures were required. The ethics in the research, introduction and application of dVSS had some problems which deserved more attention. ConclusionsClinical use of dVSS in cardiothoracic surgery is relatively safe and effective, but research quality needs to be improved. More studies on the economics and ethics of dVSS are needed in the field of cardiothoracic surgery. Relevant measures of precaution, accountability and patient protection are required to further improve clinical application of dVSS in cardiothoracic surgery, and whole-process ethical supervision should be conducted with the help of existing clinical ethical review platform.