ObjectiveTo review the present clinical evaluation of treatment for chronic low back pain. MethodsThe literature on the effectiveness evaluation method of chronic low back pain was reviewed and summarized. ResultsMany scoring systems are used to assess the treatment for chronic low back pain through the evaluation of pain and functional disability. The function evaluations are divided into general and disease-specific evaluations. Currently the most widely used evaluation systems are as follows: short-form 36 health survey scale (SF-36), Oswestry disability index (ODI), Roland-Morris disability questionnaire (RDQ), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) low back pain scoring system, Quebec back pain disability scale (QBPDS), and Macnab criteria. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and numerical rating scale (NRS) are usually used to evaluate the pain degree. ConclusionThere are many effectiveness evaluation methods of chronic low back pain, but there is still a lack of more comprehensive, concise, and practical evaluation method. Further studies are required to develop it.
ObjectiveTo compare the effect of intravenous 20% mannitol or dexamethasone (DM) on low back and leg pain after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF). MethodsBetween October 2012 and September 2013, 100 patients with degenerative lumbar diseases underwent MI-TLIF and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. All patients were randomly divided into 3 groups:34 patients received intravenous 20% mannitol after operation (mannitol group); 32 patients received intravenous DM after operation (DM group); and 34 patients received neither dehydrating agent nor steroid after operation (control group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, clinical symptoms, lesion types, and lesion segments between groups (P>0.05). The serum levels of inflammatory factors[tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), interleukin 1β (IL-1β), and IL-6] were measured by ELISA at pre-operation and 3, 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours after operation. Low back and leg pain was determined by using visual analogue scale (VAS) score after operation. ResultsAll procedures were smoothly performed without major complications of nerve root injury, hematoma, or infection. There was no significant difference in operation time and intraoperative blood loss between groups (P>0.05). The VAS score of low back pain showed no significant difference between groups at all time points after operation (P>0.05); the VAS score of leg pain in the DM group was significantly lower than that in the control group at all time points (P<0.05), and than those in the mannitol group at 3, 24, 48, and 96 hours after operation (P<0.05). The serum level of TNF-α in the DM group was significantly lower than that in the control group at all time points (P<0.05), and than that in the mannitol group at 3, 48, 72, and 96 hours after operation (P<0.05). The serum level of IL-1β in the DM group was significantly lower than that in the control group at 3, 24, 48, and 72 hours after operation (P<0.05), and than that in the mannitol group at all time points after operation (P<0.05). The serum level of IL-6 in the DM group was significantly lower than that in the control group at 3 and 24 hours after operation (P<0.05), and than that in the mannitol group at 3, 24, and 48 hours after operation (P<0.05). ConclusionIntravenous 20% mannitol may has no effect on postoperative low back and leg pain, while DM can markedly relieve leg pain after MI-TLIF.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness and safety of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for upper lumbar disc herniation. MethodsRetrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 26 patients with upper lumbar disc herniation, who were in line with the selection criteria and underwent MIS-TLIF in 14 patients (MIS-TLIF group) and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (OTLIF) in 12 patients (OTLIF group) between December 2007 and May 2012. There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, level of disc herniation, side of disc herniation between 2 groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, and complications were compared between 2 groups. The clinical outcome was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores. The fusion rate was determined by using CT three-dimensional reconstruction and dynamic lumbar radiography at last follow-up. ResultsPrimary healing of incisions was obtained in both groups. No difference was found in operation time between 2 groups (t=0.858, P=0.399), but MIS-TLIF group had less intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage volume than OTLIF group (P<0.05). The average follow-up duration was 34.1 months with a range of 12-50 months. No complication of dural tear, infection, spinal nerve trauma, and implant failure occurred. The VAS scores of lower back pain and radicular pain and ODI scores at preoperation showed no significant difference between 2 groups (P>0.05). The VAS score of lower back pain and ODI score at 1 day after operation in MIS-TLIF group were significantly lower than those in the OTLIF group (P<0.05), but no difference was found in VAS scores of radicular pain between 2 groups (P>0.05). Difference in all scores was not significant at last follow-up between 2 groups (P>0.05). The fusion rate was 92.8% (13/14) in MIS-TLIF group, and was 100% (12/12) in OTLIF group at last follow-up. ConclusionMIS-TLIF is a safe and effective procedure for upper lumbar disc herniation as an alternative to other techniques.
ObjectiveTo analyze the effectiveness of direct screw repair for lumbar spondylolysis by using intraoperative O-arm based navigation and microendoscopic techniques. MethodsBetween February 2012 and May 2014, 11 consecutive patients with lumbar spondylolysis were treated with Buck's procedure by the aid of intraoperative O-arm based navigation and minimally invasive approach. The debridement and autograft of pars interarticularis defects was performed under microendoscopy. There were 7 males and 4 females, with an average age of 28.4 years (range, 19-47 years) and an average disease duration of 10.5 months (range, 8-23 months); no nerve symptoms or signs of lower limb was observed. The radiological examinations showed single level bilateral lumbar spondylolysis without obvious disc degeneration, lumbar instability, or spondylolisthesis. Isthmic injury located at L4 in 2 cases and at L5 in 9 cases. Of 11 patients, 7 were rated as grade 2 disc degeneration, and 4 as grade 3 disc degeneration according to the modified Pfirrmann classification system. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and complications were recorded. The fluoroscopic examinations were performed to assess defect repair and screw position. Visual analogue scale (VAS) score was used to evaluate the improvement of low back pain. ResultsThe average operation time was 147.6 minutes (range, 126-183 minutes). The average blood loss was 54.9 mL (range, 40-85 mL). Primary healing of incision was obtained. There was no complication of nerve root injury, dural tear, or infection. Three patients had pain at donor site postoperatively, and pain disappeared within 3 weeks. The average follow-up duration was 15.7 months (range, 10-23 months). VAS score of low back pain was significantly decreased from preoperative 7.1±2.3 to 1.8±0.4 at last follow-up (t=13.42, P=0.01). Of 22 isthmic bone grafting, bilateral isthmic bony fusion was achieved in 7 patients and unilateral isthmic bony fusion in 3 patients at 6-10 months (mean, 7.9 months). One patient failed bilateral isthmic bony fusion, and had bony resorption. ConclusionDebridement, autograft, and percutaneous intralaminar screw fixation by microendoscopy and O-arm based navigation may provide safe and effective treatment for spondylolysis. Minimally invasive direct repair can obtain satisfactory effectiveness.