Objective To formulate an optimal treatment for patients with acute organophosphorus pesticide poisoning through the evidence-based approach. Methods Based on the clinical questions raised from a real-life patient of acute organophosphorus pesticide poisoning (OP poisoning) in Emergency ICU (EICU), we searched ACP journal club (1991-April, 2006), The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2006), MEDLINE (1966-May 2006) and Chinese Biological Medical Database(1978-May 2006) for systematic reviews , clinical randomized controlled trials, cohort and case-control studies using the keywords of “organophosphorus compounds, poisoning, insecticides, oximes, cholinesterase reactivators, and intermediate syndrome”. The quality of the included studies was assessed. Results One Cochrane systematic review and one meta-analysis were included. These two studies concluded that there was no clear evidence on the benefits of oximes for acute organophosphorus pesticide poisoning. Based on the current evidence, integrated with clinical expertise and the patients’ values, the oximes were not used for this patient, only low-dose atropine was administered with other supportive therapies. After one week of treatment, the patient was discharged since her vital signs were stable and clinical symptoms were relieved. Conclusions The appropriate management for acute organophosphorus pesticide poisoning has been formulated with the approach of evidence-based medicine. Large-scale, methodologically-sound trials are required.
Objectives To conduct a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of thymosin-α1 for HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Science Citation Index, Current Content Connect, Cochrane Controlled Trial Register and Chinese Biomedical Database (CBMdisc) to September 15, 2005, and screened the references of eligible trials by hand-searching. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing thymosin-α1 with non-antiviral interventions (placebo, no treatment and standard care) in patients with HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B were eligible for inclusion. We conducted quality assessment and data extraction by two independent investigators with disagreement resolved by discussion. We used chi-square test and Galbraith plot to detect the heterogeneity, and used fixed (Mantel-Haenzel) and random effect model (DerSimonian-Laird) to pool the trials. When the results in two models differed, the results of random effect were reported. Subgroup analysis was performed to detect whether the duration affected the efficacy of thymosin. Results Four RCTs were included. It was found that the rate of loss of HBeAg was 38.8% in thymosin, significantly higher than that of 12.4% in control groups (RR 2.22, 95%CI 1.55 to 3.21, P=0.000). Loss of HBV-DNA was 36.9% in thymosin-α1, significantly higher than that of 13.8% in control groups (RR 2.18, 95%CI 1.50 to 3.17, P=0.000). Both short-duration (8-13 weeks) and regular duration (26-52 weeks) of thymosin-α1 achieved higher loss of HBeAg and HBV-DNA. The complete response rate was 32.3% in thymosin-α1, significantly higher than the control, 11.3% (RR 2.91, 95%CI 1.71 to 4.94, P=0.000). No statistical significance was found for HBeAg seroconversion and ALT normalization. No significant adverse drug reactions were found. Conclusions Thymosin-α1 might be efficacious in loss of HBeAg and HBV-DNA, and complete response for patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. Little evidence was available on HBeAg seroconversion, normalization of ALT, loss of HBsAg, and histological response. Further high-quality RCTs were needed for confirmation.
Objective To provide evidence for the establishment and improvement of public health system in China by comparing national public health emergency system of some representative countries.Methods The principle and method of evidence-based science were applied to search and evaluate data from the official websites of China, United States, United Kingdom, Australia and Singapore. The performance of each country’s public health emergency response system in SARS prevention and control, as well as their organization structure and mechanism were compared. The existing problems and corresponding countermeasures were then put forward. Results Public health system showed the best performance was in US, UK and Australia. The responding mechanism of Singapore was highly admired by WHO. The organization structure of China was similar to that of developed countries, but its performance was far lagged behind because of insufficient financial support, poor management and inefficient operational mechanism. Conclusions The public health emergency response system in China needs to be reformed by giving priority to mechanism reinforcement. Different models should be taken into account regarding different regional situations in China.