ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of tension suture on healing quality of incision after abdominal surgery, and to provide a theoretical basis for reducing post-operative wound complications. MethodLiteratures on the tension suture in the application of abdominal incision were searched from January 2005 to January 2015, and then a Meta-analysis was carried out based on the data obtained from CBM, CNKI, and WanFang database. ResultsEight articles involving 2 001 patients with abdominal surgery, including 1 044 cases in tension suture group, and 957 cases in the conventional suture group, were incorporated. The Meta analysis results showed that, the technique of tension suture could reduce the incidence of post-operative wound infection (OR=0.40, 95% CI: 0.28-0.57, P<0.05), fat liquefaction (OR=0.51, 95% CI: 0.37-0.69, P<0.05), incisional hernia (OR=0.11, 95% CI: 0.04-0.34, P<0.05), wound dehiscence (OR=0.13, 95% CI: 0.07-0.25, P<0.05), and second stage surgery (OR=0.16, 95% CI: 0.09-0.30, P<0.05). But, it would also augment the risk of post-operative skin incision necrosis (OR=15.14, 95% CI: 2.79-82.08, P<0.05). On the other hand, the method of tension suture had no effect on the subcutaneous hemorrhage in the incision area (OR=0.58, 95% CI: 0.30-1.13, P>0.05). ConclusionsCompared with conventional suture, tension suture can reduce the hazard of wound infection, fat liquefaction, incisional hernia, wound dehiscence, and reoperation after abdominal surgery. In contrast, it can also increase the risk of post-operative skin incision necrosis.
ObjectiveTo research the effect of different surgical sutures on abdominal surgical incision healing quality, and provide a novel theory basis for promoting the healing of incision of abdominal wall. MethodsTotally 341 patients who underwent laparotomy were collected from general surgery of Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, and they were randomly divided into three groups: the including polydioxanoneⅡ(PDSⅡ) suture group, abdominal wall incision except the skin was successively sutured with PDSⅡsuture; the Vicryl group, abdominal wall incision except the skin was successively suture with antibacterial Vicryl; and the common silk thread group, abdominal wall incision was performed layering intermittent silk suture. ResultsIn terms of suture time, the PDSⅡsuture group [(11.23±1.62) min〕was significantly lower than the Vicryl group [(14.04±1.20) min〕, P < 0.05, and also both were significantly lower than the ordinary silk thread group [(21.95±1.95) min〕, P < 0.05. In respect of rejection reaction, incision infection and incision split, the PDSⅡsuture group and the Vicryl group were significantly lower than the ordinary silk thread group (P < 0.05), but compared the PDSⅡsuture group with the Vicryl group, the differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Regarding post operation hospitalization duration, fat liquefaction and effusion, compared the differences between the three groups were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). ConclusionFull fascia is successively suture with PDSⅡsutures and antibacterial Vicryl suture that can significantly shorten the suture time, reduce the incidence of rejection incision, wound infection and wound dehiscence and promote the postoperative recovery of the patients.