Objective To systematically review the benefits and risks of more intensive versus less intensive blood pressure control in Asian elderly patients over 60 years old. Methods The PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP and CBM databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of intensive versus less blood pressure control from inception to August 2022. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data and evaluated the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Results A total of 6 RCTs involving 20 701 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that intensive blood pressure control could reduce the incidence of cardiovascular death, stroke, and heart failure. However, it could not reduce the incidence of all-cause death and myocardial infarction. Subgroup analysis showed that systolic blood pressure greater than 140 mmHg could not reduce the incidence of cardiovascular death. The safety evaluation found no increase in adverse events or renal injury in intensive blood pressure control group. Conclusion The current evidence shows that intensive blood pressure control can reduce the incidence of cardiovascular death, stroke and heart failure events in elderly Asian patients over 60 years old, but it has no effect on all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction events. It has good safety. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
Objective To systematically review the intervention effects and safety of cardiovascular polypill for the relevant risk factors of coronary heart disease. Methods The randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on polypill in intervening coronary heart disease were searched in PubMed, CENTRAL, ICTRP, CBM, CNKI, WanFang and VIP from their inception to September 2012. Two reviewers independently screened the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted the data, and assessed the methodological quality. Then the analysis was conducted. Results A total of 5 RCTs from overseas were included. The descriptive analysis showed that: a) as for blood pressure, polypill was obviously superior to placebo in reducing SBP and DBP with a significant difference, but it didn’t reveal difference compared to the hypotensive drugs used alone; b) as for serum lipid, polypill was obviously superior to placebo in reducing TC, TG and LDL-C with a significant difference, but there was no difference between polypill and standard drug treatment; c) as for glucose, polypill was obviously superior to placebo in reducing glucose with a significant difference; d) as for adverse reaction, such adverse events as cough, bleeding tendency or gastritis, liver and kidney dysfunction were reported in the included studies; e) as for drug compliance, polypill showed no differences compared with either standard treatment or placebo. Conclusion Polypill has intervention effects on the relevant factors of coronary heart disease, such as hypertension and serum lipid, etc. Due to quantity limitation of the included trials, the above conclusion still needs to be further proved by performing more large scale and high quality studies. For lack of adequate evidence, this review does not recommend polypill as a primary care for cardiovascular disease.