Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of prosthetic revision using custom-made long stem prosthesis and allograft-prosthesis composite (APC) for aseptic loosening after bone tumor resection. Methods Between January 2002 and June 2008, 14 patients with aseptic loosening after bone tumor resection were treated. There were 8 males and 6 females,aged 21-70 years (mean, 43.9 years). The locations were distal femur (8 cases), proximal femur (2 cases), and proximal tibia (4 cases). Pain of the affected l imb occurred after 6-31 years of prosthesis replacement and worsened when bearing and walking; 6 patients had shortened l imb. The functional results were assessed quantitatively according to the functional rating system of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS). The MSTS score was 16.36 ± 1.50 before revision. The X-ray films showed obvious prosthetic loosening and subsidence. The average time of symptom was 4.5 years (range, 3-9 years). In 7 patients having severe bone loss (the decrease of the thickness of cortical bone was more than 50%) and the prosthetic subsidence was more than 2 cm, the revision operation with the APC was performed; in 7 patients having less bone loss (the decrease of the thickness of cortical bone was less than 50%), the custom-made long stem prosthesis was performed. Results All wound healed by first intention. Two patients had temporary peroneal nerve paralysis and recovered after 3 months. All the patients were followed up 3.6 years on average (range, 2 years and 2 months-7 years) after revision. After revision, pain was rel ieved and the range of joint was improved. The MSTS score was 23.43 ± 2.56 at 12 months after revision showing significant difference when compared with the preoperative score (t=8.910, P=0.024). The X-ray films showed that lucency space l ine around stem cement in 2 patients at 12 months, and no prosthesis loosening and infection occurred. Conclusion The prosthetic revision after l imb salvage surgery with prosthesis for bone tumors was acceptable. The good functional results can be achieved by the revision with the APC or the custom-made long stem prosthesis according to the bone loss.
Objective To evaluate the cl inical outcomes of the wide resection and the functional reconstruction for treating mal ignant tumors of the proximal femur. Methods The cl inical data were analysed from 62 patients with mal ignant tumors of the proximal femur treated between January 1987 and December 2007. There were 29 males and 33 females with a median age of 35 years (range, 14-73 years). In 41 patients with primary mal ignant tumors having a disease course of 0.5-14.0 months, there were 16 cases of osteosarcoma, 7 cases of fibrosaroma, 6 cases of chondrosarcoma, 6 cases of mal ignant fibrous histiocytoma, 4 cases of mesenchymal sarcoma,1 case of Ewing sarcoma, and 1 case of angiosarcoma, including 3 cases of type IB, 2 cases of type IIA, 35 cases of type IIB, and 1 case of type III according to Enneking stage. In 21 patients with metastatic tumors, 16 had a mal ignant tumor history; the disease course was 0.1-28.0 months (3.4 months on average). Radical resection was performed in 9 cases, extensive resection in 39 cases, and marginal resection in 14 cases. After resection, 39 cases underwent reconstruction with prostheses (prostheses group) and 14 cases underwent reconstruction with allograft-prosthetic composites (APC, APC group). Results All incision healed by first intention. Twenty-six cases died of tumor metastasis,their postoperative survive time was 16-56 months (28 months on average). The average follow-up time was 64 months (range, 28-221 months) in 36 survival patients. The local recurrence rate of primary mal ignant tumors was 4.88% (2/41). In prostheses group, dislocation of femoral head occurred in 2 cases, fracture of prosthetic stem in 1 case, hip pain in 3 cases, acetabular wear in 3 cases, and stem loosening in 5 cases. In APC group, nonunion of APC occurred in 3 cases and acetabular wear in 1 case. At last follow-up, the average Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) functional scores were 77.69% ± 6.50% in prostheses groupand 85.71% ± 7.45% in APC group, showing significant difference (P lt; 0.001). Conclusion When the wide resection isperformed for mal ignant tumors of the proximal femur, better local control could be achieved. Compared with econstruction of the prosthesis, the APC reconstruction can provide better function.