Objective To investigate the closing method of wound after removalof the traditional pedicled abdominal flap. Methods Accordingto the design,the pedicled abdominal flaps were cut and lifted, and then the incision were extended from both sides on base of the flap to anterior superior iliac spine, respectively. After separating on superficial fascia, two flaps were obtained. The wound of donor site was closed completely by these two pedicled flaps. Twelvepatients with skin defects on hands or forearms were treated using the reformedmethod of traditional pedicled abdominal flap. Results All of the 12 reformed pedicled abdominal flaps survived, and only one had local necrosis on the distalpart of the abdominal flap, about 1.5 cm ×2.0 cm. Conclusion This new designcould provide a good method to close the abdominal wound after removal of pedicled abdominal flap.
In order to resolve the shortcomings of traditional pedicled abdominal skin flap, the pedicled abdominal subcorium vascular-net flap was reformed and applied clinically. Twenty-eight cases with scar on hand or wrist were treated, including 20 males and 8 females. The age was ranged from 18 to 35 years old. The key point in the design was rotating 45 degrees of the flap from the primary site toward the pedicle. The ratio of the length to width of the flap was 1-1.8 : 1, and the wound of the donor site was covered by direct suture. Five to seven days later, all the flaps were divided and survived. The advantages of this flap were as follows: skin-grafting on the donor site was not necessary; the time needed for cutting the pedicle was shortened, and the flap is thinner than the traditional flap.
ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness between toe transfer combined with an abdominal flap and bag-shaped abdominal flap for treatment of totally degloved hand. MethodsBetween January 2005 and January 2012,18 patients with totally degloved hand were treated by two kinds of techniques.Those patients were divided into 2 groups according to the technique.The bag-shaped abdominal flap was used in 8 cases (group A),and toe transfer with a dorsalis pedis skin flap combined with abdominal S-shaped tile-joint subdermal vascular network flaps was performed in 10 cases (group B).There was no significant difference in gender,age,injury cause,injury degree,and interval between injury and operation between 2 groups (P>0.05).The static two-point discrimination (s2PD),grip power of the reconstructed hand,time of returning to work,and active total range of motion (ROM) of the operated finger were compared between 2 groups to assess the effectiveness. ResultsAll flaps and skin grafts survived in 2 groups.One flap suffered vascular crisis at 2 days after operation and survived after surgical exploration in group B.All patients were followed up 12-24 months (mean,16 months).At last follow-up,group B showed a better recovery of s2PD of the thumb and ROM,and shorter time of returning to work than group A (P<0.05),but no significant difference was found in grip power of the reconstructed hand and s2PD of the other fingers between 2 groups (P>0.05). ConclusionThe technique of toe transfer combined with an abdominal flap is better than traditional bag-shaped abdominal flap with the advantages of easy dissection,less time of operation,and satisfactory functional recovery.
ObjectiveTo explore the effectiveness of dual-pedicle abdominal flap for unilateral breast reconstruction.MethodsBetween March 2014 and March 2018, a clinical data of 19 female patients underwent dual-pedicle abdominal flap reconstruction because of unilateral mastectomy defect was reviewed retrospectively. The median age was 45 years (range, 32-51 years), including 3 immediate breast reconstruction and 16 delayed breast reconstruction, and left side in 7 cases and right side in 12 cases. Unilateral breast reconstruction were performed for 8 patients with unilateral pedicle transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap and contralateral free TRAM flap, for 3 patients with pedicle TRAM flap and contralateral deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap, for 7 patients with bilateral DIEP flaps, for 1 patient with free muscle-sparing TRAM flap and contralateral DIEP flap. The size of abdominal flap ranged from 24 cm×7 cm to 43 cm×13 cm. The donor sites were closed directly.ResultsVascular crisis ocuurred in 1 flap and relieved after surgical exploration. The other flaps survived. Poor wound healing in abdominal incision occurred in 1 patient and was successfully treated with debridement. The other donor sites healed without any other complication. The patients were followed up with a median period of 12 months (range, 4-42 months). Four patients received reparative operation of their reconstructive breast, and 2 patients received mamopexy of the contralateral breast due to mastoptosis. The abdominal BREAST-Q score was 84.1±11.7, chest score was 86.5±8.9, and breast score was 67.6±16.4 at last follow-up.ConclusionThe dual-pedicle abdominal flap for unilateral breast reconstruction provides adequate soft tissue volume and good blood supply. It is a reliable and effective breast reconstructive method for patients who need large tissue volume to make symmetric with the contralateral breast, or slim patients with few tissue in the donor site, or patients with scars in the donor site, especially vertical abdominal scars.