摘要:目的：探讨急性冠脉综合征患者血清IL-10/IL-6平及NFκB活性变化。方法：采用ELISA法检测45例急性冠脉综合征（ACS）患者,20例稳定性心绞痛（SAP）患者,20例非冠心病为对照者血清IL-10、IL-6水平；同时细胞免疫组化测定各组外周血单个核细胞NF-κB活性。结果: ACS组血清IL-6/IL-10 比值及NF-κB活性均高于SAP组及对照组(ACS: 1.69 ±0.53,0.32± 0.12;SAP: 1.06 ± 0.38,0.13 ±0.07;对照组: 0.92 ± 0.41,0.11±0.09, 均P＜0.05)。结论：炎症介质及抗炎症介质分泌失衡在急性冠脉综合征中发挥了重要作用。Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the clinical value of Theratio IL6/IL10Interleukin10(IL10)/ interleukin6(IL6) and Nuclear factorκappa B activation in acute coronary syndrome. Methods: Serum level of IL10, IL6 were measured for 45 cases patients of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), 20 cases patients of stable angina pectoris (SAP) and 20 cases patients without Coronary heart diseas（CHD）as control group by means of Enzyme linked immune absorption assay, while NFκB Activation measured by cell immunohistochemical method In Peripheral blood monouclear cell. Results： The ratio IL6/IL10 and Nuclear factorκappa B activation were significantly higher in patients with ACS (169±053,032±012) than in those of SAP (106±038,013±007) and Control (092±041,011±009)(Plt;005). Conclusion：there was Inflammatory imbalance between IL10 and IL6 in ACS, Inflammatory effects is important to devope to acute coronary syndrome
Objective To evaluate the early diagnostic value of ischemia modified albumin (IMA) for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS). Methods The study group consisted of 177 patients with suspected NSTEACS whose blood was collected within six hours after the onset of chest pain to determine cardiac troponin I (cTnI), and IMA was determined through the albumin cobalt binding (ACB) test. After standardized diagnosis and treatment and GRACE risk score, the patients then were divided into three groups according to the final diagnosis: the NSTEMI (non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction) group (n=34), the UA (unstable angina pectoris) group (n=56) and the NICP (non-ischemia chest pain) group (n=87). Meanwhile, 58 people taking the routine examination in the same hospital at that time were randomly selected as the control group. With the results of IMA, ROC curve analysis was used to determine the optimal cutoff of this assay for identifying patients with NSTEACS from those with NICP. Results of IMA, ECG and cTnI were correlated with final diagnosis, and their diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were evaluated for NSTEACS. Results The IMA concentration in the serum showed no significant difference between the NSTEMI group and the UA group, whereas there were significant differences between the former two groups and the NICP group. The sensitivity and specificity at a cutoff point 67.49 U/mL were 91.1% and 86.2%, respectively when the ROC curve area was 0.950. The correlation between the IMA concentration and GRACE risk score was negative. Conclusion IMA is an early sensitive indicator for NSTEACS and a useful predictor of prognosis.
Objective To determine the benefits of an invasive compared to a conservative strategy for treating unstable anguba (UA)/ non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Methods We searched The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2009), MEDLINE (1996 to September 2009), EMbase (1974 to September 2009), CBM (1989 to 2009), CNKI (1997 to 2009), and VIP (1989 to 2009). The quality of the included studies was critically evaluated. Data analyses were performed using the Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 5.0 software. Results Seven randomized controlled trials involving 11 394 patients met the inclusion criteria. The results meta-analyses showed the incidence of all-cause mortality at six months follow-up was lower in the early invasive group compared with the conservative group (RR=0.75, 95%CI 0.61 to 0.92, P=0.007); the relative risk of myocardial infarction was significantly decreased in the early invasive group (RR=0.74, 95%CI 0.63 to 0.87); there was a reduction in rehospitalization for unstable angina in the invasive group (RR=0.66, 95%CI 0.61 to 0.73, Plt;0.000 01); the invasive strategy was associated with a two-fold increase in the relative risk of PCI-related myocardial infarction (as variably defined). There was not a significant increase in bleeding by an invasive strategy at six months follow-up, but, a routine invasive strategy was associated with a significantly higher bleeding rate at 1-year follow-up (RR=2.22, 95%CI 1.55 to 3.17, Plt;0.000 1). Patients with elevated cardiac biomarker levels at baseline benefited more from routine intervention, with no significant benefit observed in patients with negative baseline marker levels. Conclusion An early invasive strategy is preferable to a conservative strategy in the treatment of UA/NSTEMI, especially higher-risk patients with elevated cardiac biomarker benefit more from invasive strategy. In addition, complications such as procedure-MI and bleeding must be paid great attention to.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the effectiveness and safety of domestic tirofiban for Chinese population with non ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) in non-interventional therapy. MethodsWe searched databases including The Cochrane Library (Issue 11, 2013), PubMed, EMbase, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data from 1994 to 2014 to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about domestic tirofiban for NSTE-ACS patients in non-interventional therapy. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality of included studies. Meta-analysis was then conducted using RevMan 5.2 software. ResultsA total of 23 RCTs were enrolled involving 2 425 patients. The results of meta-analysis showed that:a) the effectiveness of tirofiban in the trial group was significantly better than that in the control group (OR=3.62, 95%CI 2.33 to 5.63, P<0.000 01); b) ST segment down improvement in the trial group was better than that in the control group (WMD=0.39, 95%CI 0.30 to 0.49, P<0.000 01); c) improvement of platelet aggregation in the trial group was better than that in the control group (WMD=27.89, 95%CI 25.45 to 30.34, P<0.000 01); d) the incidences of cardiovascular events of composite endpoints in the trial group were lower than that in the control group (during 36 h:OR=0.20, 95%CI 0.12 to 0.31, P<0.000 01; and after 30 days:OR=0.31, 95%CI 0.23 to 0.42, P<0.000 01); and e) the incidence rate of bleeding in the trial group was higher than that in the control group (OR=1.53, 95%CI 1.09 to 2.15, P=0.02). ConclusionCompared with routine drugs used alone, tirofiban has better therapeutic effects in non-interventional therapy for Chinese population with NSTE-ACS, but the incidence of bleeding is relatively high.
Objective To investigate the efficacy of LDL-C lowering treatment on NSTE-ACS, and to analyze the target LDL-C level for clinical treatment. Methods PubMed, EMbase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science databases were searched up to January 2016 for randomized controlled trials assessing the effects of LDL-C lowering therapy on major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients with NSTE-ACS. Two reviewers independently screened litertures, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, and then meta-analysis was performed by using Stata12.0 and RevMan 5.3 software. Result A total of 12 RCT including 4 702 individuals with NATE-ACS were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with the control group, the statin group could significantly reduced the risk of MACE (RR=0.68, 95% CI 0.549 to 0.834,P=0.000). With 18.68 months of follow-up, patients in target LDL-C level from over 70 mg/dL to less than 100 mg/dL group had lower risk of MACE than other LDL-C level group. When LDL-C lower 20% to 40% than baseline with 28.99 months follow-up, patients in target of LDL-C level from over 70 mg/dL to less than 100 mg/dL group had lowest risk of MACE (RR=20.143, 95% CI 6.946 to 58.414,P=0.000). Conclusion LDL-C lower treatment can lower the risk of MACE in patients with NSTE-ACS. Patients in target LDL-C level from over 70 mg/dL to less than 100 mg/dL group have relatively low risk of MACE, in which patients who lower 20% to 40% LDL-C than baseline will get more benefits from LDL-C lowering therapy.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of rehabilitation exercise on exercise tolerance and cardiovascular risk factors in patients with non-acute coronary syndrome (non-ACS) after interventional therapy.MethodsA total of 102 patients with coronary heart disease and non-ACS in our hospital from December 2018 to June 2019 were selected and randomly divided into a control group (n=51, 30 males and 21 females with an average age of 56.1±4.8 years) and a trial group (n=51, 34 males and 17 females with an average age of 55.1±4.9 years). The control group received routine treatment, while the trial group received regular supervised rehabilitation exercise on the basis of routine treatment. Patients were followed up for 6 months to compare the differences in cardiovascular risk factors (blood pressure, blood lipid, fasting blood glucose), 6-minute walking distance (6MWD), adverse lifestyle changes and treatment compliance between the two groups after treatment.ResultsThe difference of 6MWD between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). In the trial group, 6MWD increased after intervention compared with that before intervention, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Comparison of total cholesterol (TC), high density liptein cholesterol (HDL-C), low density liptein cholesterol (LDL-C) and fasting blood glucose in the trial group before and after intervention showed statistically significant differences (P<0.05). The differences in TC, HDL-C and LDL-C in the control group before and after intervention were statistically significant (P<0.05). It was statistically significant in dietary compliance rate, smoking cessation rate and alcohol cessation rate between the two groups (P<0.05); the differences in the dietary compliance and drug compliance of the trial group before and after intervention were statistically significant (P<0.05).ConclusionRegular supervised rehabilitation exercise can significantly improve the exercise tolerance and cardiovascular risk factors of non-ACS patients after coronary intervention treatment, so as to improve the quality of life and long-term prognosis of non-ACS patients, which is worthy of clinical application.