Objective To explore the influencing factors of lymph node metastasis of Siewert Ⅱ/Ⅲ gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (AEG) and its influence on prognosis of this kind of patients. Methods The clinical and pathological data of 49 patients with Siewert Ⅱ/Ⅲ AEG who admitted to Shiyan Hospital of Traditional Chinese from January 2010 to January 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses of factors affecting lymph node metastasis of AEG were performed by using a chi-square test and an unconditional logistic regression model; the effect of lymph node metastasis on the prognosis of patients with Siewert Ⅱ/Ⅲ AEG was performed by log-rank test. Results Multivariate unconditional logistic regression analysis showed that, tumor diameter (P=0.008), depth of invasion (P=0.019), vascular tumor thrombus (P=0.020), and degree of differentiation (P=0.017) were all influencing factors of lymph node metastasis. Patients with Siewert Ⅱ/Ⅲ AGE without lymph node metastasis had better survival than those with lymph node metastasis (P=0.005). Conclusion Tumor diameter, depth of invasion, degree of differentiation, and vascular tumor thrombus are independent risk factors for lymph node metastasis in patients with Siewert Ⅱ/Ⅲ AEG, and lymph node metastasis is associated with poor prognosis.
ObjectiveTo analyze rate of intraperitoneal lymph node metastasis (LNM) in Siewert type Ⅱ/Ⅲ adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG) so as to determine optimal extent of lymph node dissection. MethodsA systematic and comprehensive search of PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane Library databases for study reports on LNM in patients with Siewert type Ⅱ/Ⅲ AEG was performed. The retrieval time ranged from database establishment to October 1, 2021. The pooled LNM rate was analyzed for each lymph node group. In addition, the influencing factors of LNM in AEG were analyzed. ResultsAfter screening, a total of 22 relevant studies were included, with a total of 3 934 cases. For the patients with Siewert type Ⅱ/Ⅲ AEG, the LNM rates of No.1, 2, 1&2, 3, 7 lymph nodes were ≥20%, LNM rates of No.4, 9, 11 (11p+11d), 11p, 16 lymph nodes were 10%–20%, LNM rates of No.4sa, 8a, 10, 11d lymph nodes were 5%–10%, the rest were <5%. For the patients with Siewert type Ⅱ AEG, the LNM rates of No.1, 2, 1&2, 3, 7 lymph nodes were ≥20%, LNM rates of No.4, 9, 11 (11p+11d), 11p lymph nodes were 10%–20%, LNM rates of No.8a, 10 lymph nodes were 5%–10%, and the rest were <5%. For the patients with Siewert type Ⅲ AEG, the LNM rates of No.1, 2, 1&2, 3, 4, 7 lymph nodes were ≥20%, LNM rate of No.11p lymph nodes was 10%–20%, LNM rates of No.4sa, 4sb, 4d, 8a, 9, 10, 11(11p+11d), 11d lymph nodes were 5%–10%, and the rest were <5%. No matter Siewert Ⅱ and (or) Ⅲ AEG patients, the rates of LNM in No.5, 6, and 12a lymph nodes were <5%. The tumor diameter ≥2 cm and higher T stage (T2–T4) increased the probability of LNM in AEG (P<0.05). ConclusionsThe results of this meta-analysis combined with the literature suggest that in clinical practice, No.10 lymph node dissection is not necessary for Siewert Ⅱ and Siewert Ⅲ AEG patients with tumor length diameter <2 cm and T1 of tumor invasion. No matter Siewert Ⅱ or Ⅲ AEG, as long as the tumor length diameter <2 cm and T1 of tumor invasion, the distal perigastric lymph nodes (No.4d, 5, 6) may not be dissected; Siewert type Ⅱ or Ⅲ AEG patients don’t need to clean No.12a lymph nodes.