Objective To analyze the clinical efficacy and mid-term outcomes of reimplantation of anomalous origin of left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery (ALCAPA), and to evaluate whether concomitant management of mitral regurgitation (MR) during ALCAPA repair is needed. Methods Between March 2005 and March 2015, 52 consecutive patients (20 males and 32 females with a median age of 10 months ranging 2-193 months) underwent reimplantation of ALCAPA at Department of Cardiac Surgery, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute. There were 14 males and 21 females with a mean age of 35.4±42.8 months not receiving mitral valvuloplasty (a Non-MVP group), and 6 males and 11 females with a mean age of 13.5±11.0 months receiving mitral valvuloplasty (a MVP group). In order to facilitate the analysis, degree of MR was graded by number: 0.0=none, 1.0=trivial, 2.0=mild, 2.5=mild-moderate, 3.0=moderate, 3.5=moderate-severe and 4.0=severe. Results The left ventricular fractional shortening (LVFS) and left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD) demonstrated significant improvement between preoperation and discharge (28.6%±9.6% vs. 32.1%±10.1%, P=0.023; 38.4±5.6 mm vs. 30.5±5.7 mm, P<0.001), and there was also significant improvement in the mean MR grade between preoperation and discharge (2.9±1.2,vs. 2.4±1.2, P=0.001). There were 4 in-hospital deaths (7.7%). The median follow-up was 21.0 months (ranging 1.5-111.0 months). Three patients (5.8%) were lost to follow-up, 1 patient required reoperation for mitral valve replacement and there was no death during follow-up. Significant improvement was seen in LVFS between discharge and final follow-up (32.1%±10.1% vs. 38.0%±6.0%, P=0.001); however, there was no significant difference in the degree of MR between discharge and final follow-up (2.4±1.2 vs. 2.3±1.2, P=0.541). There was no significant difference in cardiopulmonary bypass time, aortic cross-clamping time, mechanical ventilation time or hospital stay between the two groups. Conclusion Creation of a dual coronary system with reimplantation of the left coronary artery results in complete recovery of left ventricular function. However, concomitant management of MR during ALCAPA repair remains controversial. Concomitant mitral valve repair for ALCAPA patients with moderate-severe and severe MR is helpful to early function recovery of mitral valve.
ObjectiveTo analyze the early outcomes of anomalous origin of the left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery (ALCAPA) patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction after surgical repair, and to explore the predictors for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support for these patients.MethodsThe clinical data of ALCAPA patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction<40%) who underwent coronary artery reimplantation in the pediatric center of our hospital from 2013 to 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into an ECMO group and a non-ECMO group. Clinical data of the two groups were compared and analyzed.ResultsA total of 64 ALCAPA patients were included. There were 7 patients in the ECMO group, including 4 males and 3 females aged 6.58±1.84 months. There were 57 pateints in the non-ECMO group, including 30 males and 27 females aged 4.34±2.56 months. The mortality of the patients was 6.25% (4/64), including 2 patients in the ECMO group, and 2 in the non-ECMO group. The postoperative complications rate was significantly higher in the ECMO group than that in the non-ECMO group (P=0.041). There were statistical differences in the cardiopulmonary bypass time [254 (153, 417) min vs. 106 (51, 192) min, P=0.013], aortic cross-clamping (ACC) time (89.57±13.66 min vs. 61.58±19.57 min, P=0.039), and preoperative left ventricular end-diastolic diameter/body surface area (132.32±14.71 mm/m2 vs. 108.00±29.64 mm/m2, P=0.040) between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that ACC time was an independent risk factor for postoperative ECMO support (P=0.005). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that the area under the ROC curve was 0.757, the sensitivity was 85.70%, specificity was 66.70%, with the cut-off value of 66 min.ConclusionACC time is an independent risk factor for postoperative ECMO support. Patients with an ACC time>66 min have a significantly higher risk for ECMO support after the surgery.