细菌耐药是一个全球性的难题，而滥用抗生素是导致细菌耐药的重要原因。合理使用抗生素的核心包括以下三点：①选择合适的抗生素（有效、经济、毒副作用小和使用方便）；②采取合适的给药方法（给药剂量、间期和途径）；③采取合适的疗程。其中抗生素的疗程究竟多长最合适是目前研究最薄弱的环节，同时也是当前和今后抗感染领域研究的热点[1]。
Objective To study and prepare a new kind of bone graft, which has osteogenesis, local anti-infective function and low immunogenicity. Methods Gentamicin-impregnated bone was prepared bymeans of ultrasonic and vacuum, the release of gentamicin in vivo was measured by inhibition bacteria. Ten healthy male adult sheep were made animal infection models of thigh bone or humerus defect of 6 mm×6 mm×20 mm at size, and the defect was inoculated into 1 ml 5×1010CFU/ml Staphylococcus aureus. The animals were randomly divided into the experimental group (n=5, the bone graft with gentamicin was implanted) and the control group (n=5, the bone graft without gentamincin). Macroscopic, WBC count, radiological, and histological investigations were carried out to evaluate the antiinfective and osteosis capability. Results The concentrations of gentamicin were 46.1 μg/ml in bone allograft and 17.3 μg/ml in muscles after 1 day. The concentrations of gentamicin exceeding the minimum inhibitory concentration lastedfor 14 days in vivo. WBC in the control group was higher than that in the experimental group. In the control group, 1 case died owing to septemia 3 weeks afteroperation. The implanted bones were wrapped in pus 4 and 6 weeks, and the defects were filled with fibre tissue 8 and 10 weeks after operation. In the experimental group, 1 case was infected, the others had a good concrescence. The bone allografts began to integrate with adjacent bone after 4-8 weeks and integrate well after 12 weeks. The X-ray and histological observation showed that new bone formed and took the place of bone allograft. Conclusion The gentamicinimpregnated bone allograft was of a good sustained release feature in vivo, local antiinfection and osteogenesis. It might be an ideal bone grafting material for bone defects with infection.
Objective To systematically assess the efficacy and clinical significance of antibiotic prophylaxis in severe acute pancreatitis (SAP), so as to provide references for its rational clinical application. Methods For collecting the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about antibiotic prophylaxis in SAP, a search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMbase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CBM and CNKI from the date of their establishment to August, 2010. After the clinical studies meeting the inclusive criteria were extracted and their quality was assessed. Meta-analysis was conduced by using RevMan 5.0 software. Results Twelve RCTs were included with a total of 777 patients. The results of Meta-analysis showed compared with the control group, the antibiotic prophylaxis group was not associated with a statistically significant reduction in mortality (RR=0.75, 95%CI 0.50 to 1.12), in the incidence of infected pancreatic necrosis (RR 0.82, 95%CI 0.63 to 1.09), in surgical interventions (RR=0.97, 95%CI 0.74 to 1.26), and in the incidence of nonpancreatic infections (RR=0.73, 95%CI 0.48 to 1.10). Conclusion Antibiotic prophylaxis for SAP does not reduce mortality, infected necrosis, or surgical intervention.
摘要:目的: 金黄色葡萄球菌(金葡菌)的感染近年来已成为医院内的主要致病菌,而其耐药性也呈逐渐升高的趋势,为了解该菌在我院的感染和耐药情况,为临床合理使用抗生素提供科学依据。 方法 : 用经典生理生化鉴定方法,对各种临床标本主要来源于痰液和各种伤口脓液标本分离到的102株金葡菌进行生物学特性及药敏试验。 结果 : 从我们医院2007年5月至2009年8月所分离出来的102株金葡菌中青霉素耐药性8923%,氨苄青霉素耐药率为9385%,没有发现万古霉素耐药菌。 结论 : 除万古霉素外,耐药率较低的依次是利福平、苯唑青霉素、环丙沙星、呋喃妥因、阿米卡星、磺胺甲基异恶唑、红霉素,而青霉素G、氨苄青霉素、四环素耐药性情况非常严重,并且多重耐药,耐药性强,应引起临床的高度重视。Abstract: Objective: To analyze the bionomics and antimicrobial susceptibility of staphylococcus aureus, which was the main pathogenic bacterium with high drug tolerance in our hospital, in order to provide the rational use of antibiotics. Methods : Samples of one hundred and two staphylococcus aureus cases from sputamentum and pus were evaluated by classic physiology and biochemistry methods to test the bionomics and antimicrobial susceptibility. Results : The drug resistance rate to penicillin, penbritin and vancomycin was 8923%, 9385% and 0, separately. Conclusion : Besides vancomycin, the drug resistance rate of rifampicin, oxazocilline, ciprofloxacin, furadantin, amikacin, sulfamethoxazole and sulfamethoxazole increased one by one. The resistance to penicillin G, penbritin and tetracycline was serious, including multidrug resistant, which should be paid highly attention.
ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy of macrolide antibiotics on patients with lower respiratory tract infection. MethodsA total of 146 patients with lower respiratory tract infections were selected from January 2011 to January 2014 in the Department of Respiratory Medicine of our hospital and divided into low risk and high risk group. Based on the clinical characteristics of the patients, low risk treatment plan was erythromycin capsule 0.25 g once, 3 times/day plus compound liquorice mixture, followed by clarithromycin 0.25 g once, 2-3 times/day plus compound liquorice mixture or clarithromycin 0.25 g once, 2-3 times/day plus compound liquorice mixture; high risk group treatment was macrolide antibiotics (erythromycin, clarithromycin) 0.25 g once, 3 times/day and second generation cephalosporins (cefaclor or cefuroxime) 0.25 g once, 3 times/day plus compound liquorice decoction. ResultsThe clinical seven-day curing rate was 54.1%, and the total effective rate was 93.1%. For low risk treatment regimen, the sevenday curing rate was 63.6%, and the total effective rate was 94.9%; for high risk treatment regimen, the seven-day curing rate was 34.0%, and the total effective rate was 89.4%. Acute bronchitis had high curing rate which was 70.1%. ConclusionMacrolide antibiotics (erythromycin, clarithromycin) oral administration in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infection is reliable and effective, which is worth promoting in clinical application.
ObjectiveTo understand the clinical distribution and drug resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae in Yibin during 2011 to 2014 so as to provide evidence for clinical rational use of antimicrobial drugs. MethodsKlebsiella pneumoniae isolated from all types of clinical specimens were collected from the First People's Hospital and the Second People's Hospital of Yibin during 2011 to 2014. VITEK2 Compact and its supporting identification card GP and drug sensitivity test card AST-GP67 were used for detection, and the results were analyzed and summarized. ResultsMost Klebsiella pneumoniae were detected from the Department of Respiratory Medicine, the proportion for each year was 48.15%, 46.24%, 45.44%, and 44.97% during 2011 to 2014. Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated were mainly from sputum samples, the proportion for each year was 81.01%, 89.18%, 87.80%, and 83.52% between 2011 and 2014. Imipenem and piperacillin/tazobactam resistance rates were lower, but the overall trend was rising. Ampicillin/sulbactam, and sulfamethoxazole resistance rates were higher. Levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin increased year by year. Aztreonam, cefepime, and amikacin rate declined. ConclusionKlebsiella pneumoniae is one of the main infection pathogen in the Department of Respiratory Medicine. Klebsiella pneumoniae resistance rates are higher. Klebsiella pneumoniae were sensitive to enzyme inhibitors β-lactam antimicrobial agents and carbapenem antibiotics.
Objective To evaluate the effects and safety of procalcitonin(PCT)-guided algorithms of antibiotic therapy in critically ill patients in intensive care unit (ICU). Methods Literatures in English and Chinese concerning randomized controlled trials(RCTs) on PCT-guided algorithms of antibiotic therapy in critically ill patients was retrieved by electronic and manual search. All related data were extracted. Meta-analysis was conducted using the statistical software RevMan 5.3 on the basis of strict quality evaluation. Results Eight RCTs involving 2708 ICU patients were included, with 1360 patients in the PCT-guided group and 1348 patients in the control group. Compared with the control group, PCT-guided algorithms were associated with a significant reduction in the duration of antibiotic therapy (MD -2.44 days, 95%CI -3.25 to -1.62, P < 0.00001), and the occurrence of adverse reaction of antibiotics was also lower (RR=0.74, 95%CI 0.56 to 0.97, P=0.03), however the mortality exhibited no difference between the PCT-guided group and the control group (RR=1.00, 95%CI 0.89 to 1.13, P=0.99). Conclusion PCT-guided algorithms can shorten the duration of antibiotic therapy and reduce the occurrence of adverse reaction in critically ill patients without significant effect on mortality.
Objective To explore the effect of standardized use of antibiotics on clinical indicators after thoracic surgery, such as pulmonary infection rate, incision infection rate, average length of hospital stay and total hospitalization cost. Methods We selected 468 patients (an observation group) who were hospitalized and received thoracic surgery from August to October 2011, 3 months after the implementation of the preventive antibiotics use protocol for thoracic surgery in West China Hospital, Sichuan University, and selected 343 patients (a control group) in the same period of the previous year (from August to October 2010). There were 326 males and 142 females with a mean age of 52.0±15.5 years in the observation group, and 251 males and 92 females with a mean age of 51.4±15.9 years in the control group. The level of antibiotic use, medication time, antibiotics cost, postoperative incision infection, incidence of pulmonary infection, postoperative hospital stay and total hospitalization cost were compared between the two groups. Results Compared with the control group, the time for preventive use of antibiotics was significantly shorter in the observation group (3.6±2.4 d vs. 6.1±3.1 d, P=0.020) and the total cost of antibiotic use significantly reduced (1 230.0±2 151.0 yuan vs.2 252.0±1 764.0 yuan, P<0.001). There was no significant difference between the two groups in hospitalization cost(36 345.0±13 320.0 yuanvs. 35 821.0±11 991.0 yuan, P=0.566), postoperative hospital stay (10.6±8.4 d vs. 10.7±5.3 d, P=0.390), the incidence of postoperative wound infection or postoperative pulmonary infection (1.5% vs. 2.3%, P=0.430; 19.2% vs. 22.2%, P=0.330). Conclusion The standardized use of antibiotics in thoracic surgery does not cause postoperative pulmonary infection and incision infection, and has no negative impact on clinical indicators. Significantly reducing the level of antibiotics use may have a positive effect on reducing medication time, in-hospital infection and the incidence of drug-resistant strains.
Objective To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of prophylactic use of antibiotics in preventing severe acute pancreatitis. Methods Randomized control trials (RCTs) of prophylactic use of antibiotics were identified from PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wangfang Database, and handly searched related literatures. The retrieval time was from inception to Dec. 2017. All the data would be analysis with the software RevMan 5.3. Results Eventually 16 RCTs of 999 participants were involved, the patients were divided into two groups: the intervention group (prophylactic use of antibiotics, n=501) and the control group (n=498). The result of meta-analysis showed that, the incidence rate of pancreatitis infectious disease and the incidence rate of peripancreatitis infectious were significant lower in the intervention group than the control group, whose OR were amount to 0.68 ［95% CI was (0.50, 0.93), P=0.02］ and 0.63 ［95% CI was (0.45, 0.88), P=0.007］ respectively. Meanwhile, concerning the rate of surgery intervention ［OR=0.79, 95% CI was (0.57, 1.08), P=0.14］ and in mortality rate ［OR=0.81, 95% CI was (0.56, 1.15), P=0.24］, there was no statistically significant. Conclusion Prophylactic antibiotic treatment can do benefit to reduce the incidence rate of pancreatitis infectious and the rate of peripancreatitis infectious disease, but can not reduce mortality in patients with severe acute pancreatitis and had no significant protective effect in patients in reducing the rate of surgery intervention and mortality rate.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of aerosolized aminoglycoside antibiotics in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) by meta-analysis.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP and Wanfang Data for the Chinese and English literature on aerosolized aminoglycoside antibiotics for VAP until May, 2018. After data extraction and quality evaluation, RevMan 5.2 software was performed for meta-analysis.ResultsA total of 9 randomized controlled trials and a total of 543 patients were included in this study. Compared with patients treated with non-atomized inhaled aminoglycoside antibiotics, meta-analysis showed that aerosol inhalation of amikacin significantly improved the clinical cure rate of patients with VAP ［odds ratio (OR)=2.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.50, 3.75), P=0.000 2］, nebulized tobramycin ［OR=2.30, 95%CI (0.92, 5.78), P=0.08］ and two or more antibiotics ［OR=2.00, 95%CI (0.62, 6.46), P=0.25］ had no significant effect on the clinical cure rate of patients with VAP; aerosolized aminoglycoside antibiotics had no significant effect on mortality of patients ［OR=1.17, 95%CI (0.66, 2.07), P=0.59］ and tracheal spasm rate ［OR=2.39, 95%CI (0.94, 6.11), P=0.07］ and renal dysfunction rate ［OR=0.62, 95%CI (0.32, 1.21), P=0.16］ in patients with VAP.ConclusionInhalation of amikacin can significantly improve the clinical cure rate of patients with VAP, but it can not reduce the mortality rate of patients; the safety of aerosolized aminoglycoside antibiotics is good, and the risk of tracheal spasm and renal function damage in patients with VAP is not increased.