Abstract： Objective To evaluate the clinical safety and neurological outcomes of right axillary artery cannulation with a side graft compared with a direct approachin aortic arch replacement for patients with acute Stanford type A aortic dissection. Methods Between July 2008 and July 2010， 280 consecutive patients with acute Stanford type A aortic dissection underwent right axillary artery cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass （CPB） in total arch replacement and stented “elephant trunk” implantation in our hospital.These 280 patients were divided into two groups according to the method of axillary artery cannulation in operation:direct arterial cannulation was used in 215 patients（direct arterial cannulationgroup， DG group， mean age of 43.1±9.5 years）， while cannulation with a side graft was used in 65 patients（ indirect cannulation group， IG group， mean age of 44.7±8.3 years）. Clinical characteristics of both groups were similar except their axillary artery cannulation method. Patient outcomes were compared as to the prevalence of clinical complications， especially neurological deficits and postoperative morbidity. Results The overall hospital mortality was 3.6% （10/280）， 3.3% （7/215） in DG group and 4.6% （3/65） in IG group respectively.Right axillary artery cannulation was successfully performed in all cases without any occurrence of malperfusion. Postoperatively， 25 patients（8.9%）developed temporaryneurological deficits， 19 cases in DG group（8.8%）， and 6 cases in IG group （9.2%）， and all these patients were cured after treatment. The incidence of postoperative complications directly related to axillary artery cannulation was significantly lower in IG group than that in DG group（1 case vs. 19 cases， P=0.045）. There were no statistical differences in arterial perfusion peak flow， peak pressure，antegrade cerebral perfusion time， deep hypothermic circulatory arrest time， and CPB time between the two groups（P ＞ 0.05）. Conclusion Right axillary artery cannulation with a side graftcan significantly reduce the postoperative complications of axillary artery cannulation. It is a safe and effective method for patients undergoing surgery for acute Stanford type A aortic dissection.
ObjectiveTo achieve a better early clinical result by modifying the total arch replacement and optimi-zing the procedure of operation. MethodWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 38 patients patients with stanford a aortic dissection underwent the modifed total arch replacement in our hospital from September to December 2014. There were 26 males and 12 females with a mean age of 52.5 years ranging from 21-76 years. Three artery conduits were adopted during the surgical procedure. Right axillary artery and femoral artery cannulation were performed for cardiopulmonary bypass. The artificial graft and the left common carotid artery was anastomosed to provide simultaneous perfusion. Low rate bilateral brain perfusion began when circulation arrested at 26℃. Reperfusion restoration was obtained after the four-branch vascular graft anastomosed to the stent and aortic wall and completed the implantation of the elephant trunk. Then the aortic root and the vascular graft anastomosis were performed to reconstruct the ascending aorta. At last, the left subclavian artery and innominate artery were anastomosed to the branch of the vascular graft under the beating heart. ResultAll 38 operations were successful. The mean hypothermic circulatory time of the whole group was 18.8±4.2 min, the time of ascending aorta blocking was 86.1±14.2 min, the time of cardiopulmonary bypass was 178.4±71.4 min, the time of postoperative awakening was 4.7±2.0 h, the time of assisted mechanical ventilator was 38.7±19.9 h. One patient died because of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), 3 patients accepted the hemodialysis, 6 patients suffered from transient neurological dysfunction, 1 patient suffered from paraparesis. There was no further complication during the follow-up of 1-3 months. ConclusionThe modified total aortic arch replacement can shorten the circulatory arrest time, cardiac arrest time and cardiopulmonary time, provide effective organ perfusion, and reduce the neurological complication and visceral damage.
ObjectiveTo investigate the application of ascending aorta cannulation and brachiocephalic trunk cannulation in acute type A aortic dissection.MethodsWe screened 183 patients with acute type A aortic dissection from January 2017 to January 2020 in our hospital. They were divided into 2 groups according to the cannulation strategy: ascending aorta cannulation and brachiocephalic trunk cannulation (a DAC group, n=42, 33 males and 9 females with a median age of 50 years) and the single axillary artery cannulation (an AAC group, n=141, 116 males and 25 females with a median age of 51 years). The general clinical data, intraoperative data and early postoperative results of the two groups before and after matching with propensity scores were compared.ResultsBefore propensity-score matching, the operation time, cardiopulmonary bypass time, aortic occlusion time and ICU stay in the DAC group were all shorter than those in the AAC group (P<0.05). The early postoperative mortality, and rates of brain complications, renal failure and pulmonary complications in the DAC group were significantly lower than those in the AAC group. After propensity-score matching, the operation time in the DAC group was significantly shorter than that in the AAC group (P<0.05). The early postoperative mortality, and rates of brain complications and pulmonary complications in the DAC group were significantly lower than those in the AAC group.ConclusionAscending aorta cannulation and brachiocephalic trunk cannulation can provide a safe, fast and effective method of establishing cardiopulmonary bypass for some acute type A aortic dissection patients, and significantly shorten the operation time without increasing surgical complications.