ObjectiveTo review the research progress of complications associated with open elbow arthrolysis so as to provide clinical reference for complication prevention and treatment. MethodsThe recent publications on open elbow arthrolysis and complications associated with it were extensively reviewed and analyzed. ResultsComplications associated with open elbow arthrolysis include ulnar nerve symptom and neuropathy, elbow instability, heterotopic ossification, and hematoma. Although some progress has been made in the complication prevention and treatment recently, there are still some challenges in the control of surgical trauma, intervention of heterotopic ossification and elbow instability after surgery, as well as postoperative analgesia due to the limitation of surgical techniques and the uncertain mechanism of these complications. ConclusionOpen elbow arthrolysis is safe and effective for elbow stiffness. However, more research on the mechanism of complications should be carried out, to further improve the overall effect of the surgery.
ObjectiveTo explore the effectiveness and safety of open arthrolysis combined with internal fixator removal for post-traumatic elbow stiffness. MethodsA retrospective analysis was made on the data of 80 cases treated by open arthrolysis for elbow stiffness between January 2010 and December 2011. The patients were divided into 2 groups:no internal fixation group (group A, n=39) and internal fixation group (group B, n=41) according to whether they underwent internal fixator removal at the same time. No significant difference was found in age, gender, affected side, injury time, elbow rigidity grade, and severity of heterotopic ossification (HO) between 2 groups (P>0.05) except for original injury type (P<0.05). The effectiveness was evaluated by the occurrence of complications including ulnar nerve symptoms, HO recurrence and re-fracture, the elbow range of motion (ROM) and the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS). ResultsThe mean follow-up duration was 15.7 months (range, 12-18 months) in group A and 16.1 months (range, 12-20 months) in group B. Ulnar nerve symptoms in 5 cases (12.8%) and HO reccurrence in 1 case (2.6%) occurred in group A, while ulnar nerve symptoms in 4 cases (9.8%), HO recurrence 1 case (2.4%), and refracture in 1 case (2.4%) occurred in group B. The incidence of each complication showed no significant difference between 2 groups (P>0.05). Both the ROM and the MEPS at last follow-up increased significantly when compared with preoperative ones in 2 groups (P<0.05). Besides, MEPS of group A was significantly higher than that of group B (t=2.36, P=0.02), but no significant difference was found in the ROM between 2 groups at last follow-up (t=0.40, P=0.69). Based on MEPS, the results were excellent in 16 cases, good in 16 cases, fair in 6 cases, and poor in 1 case in group A with an excellent and good rate of 82.1%;the results were excellent in 10 cases, good in 25 cases, fair in 4 cases, and poor in 2 cases in group B with an excellent and good rate of 85.4%. There was no significant difference in excellent and good rate between 2 groups (χ2=0.16, P=0.69). ConclusionOpen elbow arthrolysis combined with internal fixator removal for post-traumatic elbow stiffness is safe and effective. However, measures for prevention of re-fracture should always be taken into consideration.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of open arthrolysis in treatment of the patient with stiff knee in late stage after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).MethodsBetween January 2014 and October 2017, 7 female patients (7 knees) with stiff knee in late stage after primary TKA were admitted. The patients were 57-71 years old (mean, 63 years). There were 2 left knees and 5 right knees. All patients underwent TKA because of knee osteoarthritis. The interval between TKA and open arthrolysis was 8-30 months (mean, 13.6 months). There were 4 patients with 10-20° of extension deficit before arthrolysis. The range of motion of knee was (54.3±12.1)°. The clinical score, functional score, and total score of Knee Society Score (KSS) before arthrolysis were 76.3±7.6, 67.9±11.1, and 144.1±16.1, respectively. During the arthrolysis, periarticular soft tissue scar was removed, the range of motion of knee was restored, the gap balance and well patellar tracking were maintained. Intensive rehabilitation after operation was supplemented.ResultsAll wounds healed by first intention, without early stage complications. All patients were followed up 12-32 months with an average of 20.1 months. No abnormality of prosthesis was found by post-operative X-ray films. The knee movement improved significantly when compared with that before arthrolysis. The range of motion was less than 90° in 1 patient and 10° of extension deficit remained in 1 patient after operation. The range of motion was (92.9±4.9)° at last follow-up. The clinical score, functional score, and total score of KSS were 81.9±5.1, 74.3±9.8, and 156.1±13.7, respectively at last follow-up. The above indexes were superior to those before operation (P<0.05).ConclusionOpen arthrolysis combined with intensive rehabilitation is a significant way to improve knee function for the patient with stiff knee in late stage after primary TKA.
Objective To explore the effect of intravenous tranexamic acid on postoperative drainage and elbow joint function after traumatic elbow stiffness release. Methods The clinical data of 44 patients with elbow joint stiffness who were treated with release surgery between March 2022 and December 2023 and met the selection criteria were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 20 patients were given intravenous infusion of 100 mL (1 g/100 mL, once a day) of tranexamic acid solution for 3 consecutive days after surgery (group A), and 24 patients were not treated with tranexamic acid after surgery (group B). There was no significant difference in baseline data such as gender, age, side, body mass index, initial injury, and preoperative hemoglobin, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and Mayo elbow function score (MEPS), elbow flexion and extension activity between the two groups (P>0.05). The drainage volume at 1 day and 3 days after operation, total drainage volume, drainage tube indwelling time, postoperative hospital stay, VAS score before operation and at 1, 2, and 3 days after operation, MEPS score before operation, at 3 months after operation, and at last follow-up, and elbow flexion and extension activity before operation and at last follow-up were recorded and compared between the two groups. Results Both groups of patients successfully completed the operation, and there was no significant difference in operation time (P>0.05). The drainage volume at 1 day and 3 days after operation, total drainage volume, drainage tube indwelling time, and postoperative hospital stay in group A were significantly less than those in group B (P<0.05). Both groups of patients were followed up 6-12 months, with an average of 8.6 months. No complications such as wound infection, elbow joint varus and varus instability or dislocation, and pulmonary embolism or other thromboembolic events occurred in either group. The VAS scores of both groups were significantly higher at 1 day and 2 days after operation than before operation (P<0.05); the VAS score of group A was significantly lower than that of group B (P<0.05). The VAS scores of both groups decreased to the preoperative level at 3 months after operation, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). At 3 months after operation and at last follow-up, the MEPS scores of both groups significantly improved when compared with those before operation (P<0.05); there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). At last follow-up, the postoperative elbow flexion and extension activity of the two groups significantly increased when compared with that before operation (P<0.05); there was no significant difference in change of elbow flexion and extension activity between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionIntravenous tranexamic acid for 3 consecutive days after release of traumatic elbow stiffness can significantly reduce postoperative drainage volume, shorten drainage tube indwelling time and hospital stay, and relieve early postoperative pain, but it has no effect on the risk of thrombotic and embolic events and postoperative elbow function.