The compressive strength of the original bone tissue was tested, based on the raw human thigh bone,bovine bone,pig bone and goat bone. The four different bone-like apatites were prepared by calcining the raw bones at 800℃ for 8 hours to remove organic components. The comparison of composition and structure of bone-like apatite from different bone sources was carried out with a composition and structure test. The results indicated that the compressive strength of goat bone was similar to that of human thigh bone, reached (135.00±7.84) MPa; Infrared spectrum (IR), X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis results showed that the bone-like apatite from goat bone was much closer to the structure and phase composition of bone-like apatite of human bones. Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) test results showed that the content of trace elements of bone-like apatite from goat bone was closer to that of apatite of human bone. Energy Dispersive Spectrometer (EDS) results showed that the Ca/P value of bone-like apatite from goat bone was also close to that of human bone, ranged to 1.73±0.033. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) patterns indicated that the macrographs of the apatite from human bone and that of goat bone were much similar to each other. Considering all the results above, it could be concluded that the goat bone-like apatite is much similar to that of human bone. It can be used as a potential natural bioceramic material in terms of material properties.
Three-dimensional (3D) bio-printing is a novel engineering technique by which the cells and support materials can be manufactured to a complex 3D structure. Compared with other 3D printing methods, 3D bio-printing should pay more attention to the biocompatible environment of the printing methods and the materials. Aimed at studying the feature of the 3D bio-printing, this paper mainly focuses on the current research state of 3D bio-printing, with the techniques and materials of the bio-printing especially emphasized. To introduce current printing methods, the inkjet method, extrusion method, stereolithography skill and laser-assisted technique are described. The printing precision, process, requirements and influence of all the techniques on cell status are compared. For introduction of the printing materials, the cross-link, biocompatibility and applications of common bio-printing materials are reviewed and compared. Most of the 3D bio-printing studies are being remained at the experimental stage up to now, so the review of 3D bio-printing could improve this technique for practical use, and it could also contribute to the further development of 3D bio-printing.
Marine-derived biopolymers are excellent raw materials for biomedical products due to their abundant resources, good biocompatibility, low cost and other unique functions. Marine-derived biomaterials become a major branch of biomedical industry and possess promising development prospects since the industry is in line with the trend of " green industry and low-carbon economy”. Chitosan and alginates are the most commonly commercialized marine-derived biomaterials and have exhibited great potential in biomedical applications such as wound dressing, dental materials, antibacterial treatment, drug delivery and tissue engineering. This review focuses on the properties and applications of chitosan and alginates in biomedicine.
ObjectiveTo explore the feasibility of three-dimensional (3D) bioprinted adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) combined with gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) to construct tissue engineered cartilage.MethodsAdipose tissue voluntarily donated by liposuction patients was collected to isolate and culture human ADSCs (hADSCs). The third generation cells were mixed with GelMA hydrogel and photoinitiator to make biological ink. The hADSCs-GelMA composite scaffold was prepared by 3D bioprinting technology, and it was observed in general, and observed by scanning electron microscope after cultured for 1 day and chondrogenic induction culture for 14 days. After cultured for 1, 4, and 7 days, the composite scaffolds were taken for live/dead cell staining to observe cell survival rate; and cell counting kit 8 (CCK-8) method was used to detect cell proliferation. The composite scaffold samples cultured in cartilage induction for 14 days were taken as the experimental group, and the composite scaffolds cultured in complete medium for 14 days were used as the control group. Real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed to detect cartilage formation. The relative expression levels of the mRNA of cartilage matrix gene [(aggrecan, ACAN)], chondrogenic regulatory factor (SOX9), cartilage-specific gene [collagen type Ⅱ A1 (COLⅡA1)], and cartilage hypertrophy marker gene [collagen type ⅩA1 (COLⅩA1)] were detected. The 3D bioprinted hADSCs-GelMA composite scaffold (experimental group) and the blank GelMA hydrogel scaffold without cells (control group) cultured for 14 days of chondrogenesis were implanted into the subcutaneous pockets of the back of nude mice respectively, and the materials were taken after 4 weeks, and gross observation, Safranin O staining, Alcian blue staining, and collagen type Ⅱ immunohistochemical staining were performed to observe the cartilage formation in the composite scaffold.ResultsMacroscope and scanning electron microscope observations showed that the hADSCs-GelMA composite scaffolds had a stable and regular structure. The cell viability could be maintained at 80%-90% at 1, 4, and 7 days after printing, and the differences between different time points were significant (P<0.05). The results of CCK-8 experiment showed that the cells in the scaffold showed continuous proliferation after printing. After 14 days of chondrogenic induction and culture on the composite scaffold, the expressions of ACAN, SOX9, and COLⅡA1 were significantly up-regulated (P<0.05), the expression of COLⅩA1 was significantly down-regulated (P<0.05). The scaffold was taken out at 4 weeks after implantation. The structure of the scaffold was complete and clear. Histological and immunohistochemical results showed that cartilage matrix and collagen type Ⅱ were deposited, and there was cartilage lacuna formation, which confirmed the formation of cartilage tissue.ConclusionThe 3D bioprinted hADSCs-GelMA composite scaffold has a stable 3D structure and high cell viability, and can be induced differentiation into cartilage tissue, which can be used to construct tissue engineered cartilage in vivo and in vitro.
With the continuous progress of materials science and biology, the significance of biomaterials with dual characteristics of materials science and biology is keeping on increasing. Nowadays, more and more biomaterials are being used in tissue engineering, pharmaceutical engineering and regenerative medicine. In repairing bone defects caused by trauma, tumor invasion, congenital malformation and other factors, a variety of biomaterials have emerged with different characteristics, such as surface charge, surface wettability, surface composition, immune regulation and so on, leading to significant differences in repair effects. This paper mainly discusses the influence of surface charge of biomaterials on bone formation and the methods of introducing surface charge, aiming to promote bone formation by changing the charge distribution on the surface of the biomaterials to serve the clinical treatment better.
The presence of thrombus on the surface of blood-contacting biomaterials in clinical practice can significantly impact both the longevity of the biomaterials and the overall survival prognosis of patients. The administration of anticoagulant and antiplatelet medications may heighten the risk of systemic bleeding. Developing biomaterials with anti-thrombogenetic properties and enabling localized anti-thrombosis may offer a solution to these challenges. The development strategies for anti-thrombogenetic biomaterials can be categorized into three main approaches based on the mechanisms of thrombus formation on biomaterial surfaces: altering physical and chemical properties, designing coatings containing or releasing active substances, and promoting endothelialization. However, due to the intricate and interconnected nature of these mechanisms, biomaterials constructed using a single approach may not effectively prevent thrombus formation. The collaborative intervention of various mechanisms can facilitate the development of biomaterials with enhanced blood compatibility.