Objective To assess the effectivness of different bone graft fusion ways in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Methods Between June 2000 and June 2009, 126 cases of thoracolumbar burst fractures were treated by onestageposterior short segment internal fixation combined with bone graft fusion. All patients had acute spine and spinal injuryat the levels of T11-L2, who were with different degrees of neural function injury (below Frankel grade D). The patients were randomly divided into 3 groups and were treated respectively by centrum combined with interbody bone graft fusion (group A), posterolateral bone graft fusion (group B), and ring bone graft fusion (group C) combined with posterior short segment pedicle instrumentation. The changes of the Cobb angle, correction loss of Cobb angle, bone fusion rate, internal fixation failure rate, Oswestry Disabil ity Index (ODI), and Frankel grade of the fracture vertebral were observed after operation to evaluate the effectiveness of different bone graft fusion ways. Results All 126 cases were followed up 24-32 months (mean, 28 months). The operation time and bleeding volume in group C were significantly larger than those in groups A and B (P lt; 0.05), but no significant difference was found between groups A and B (P gt; 0.05). At 2 years after operation and last follow-up, the Cobb angle and correction loss in group B were significantly larger than those in groups A and C (P lt; 0.05), but there was no significant difference between groups A and C (P gt; 0.05). At last follow-up, the bone fusion rate and internal fixation failure rate were 100% and 0 in group A, 78.6% and 21.4% in group B, and 97.5% and 0 in group C; there were significant differences between group B and groups A, C (P lt; 0.05), but no significant difference was found between groups A and C (P gt; 0.05). ODI and Frankel grade were obviously improved after operation, showing significant differences between preoperation and last follow-up (P lt; 0.05) in 3 groups, between group B and groups A, C (P lt; 0.05), but no significant difference was found between groups A and C (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion The centrum combined with interbody bone graft fusion is best in 3 bone graft fusion ways because of its optimum bone fusion and according with human body biomechanics mechanism. Back outboard bone graft fusion may not a appropriate bone fusion way because of its high internal fixation failure rate and not according with human body biomechanics mechanism. The ring bone graft fusion may not be an indispensable bone fusion way because of its common bone fusion ratio and lower cost-performance ratio.
Objective To review the progress of surgical treatment for the thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis. Methods The related literature of surgical treatment for the thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis was reviewed and analyzed from the aspects such as surgical approach, fixed segments, fusion ranges, bone graft, and bone graft material research progress. Results Most scholars prefer anterior or combined posterior approach for surgical treatment of thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis because it possessed advantage of precise effectiveness. In recent years, a simple posterior surgery achieved satisfactory effectiveness. The fixation segments are mainly composed of short segments or intervertebral fixation. The interbody fusion is better for the bone graft fusion range and manner, and the bone graft materials is most satisfied with autologous iliac Cage or titanium Cage filled with autologous cancellous bone. Conclusion The perfect strategy for treating the thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis has not yet been developed, and the personalized therapy for different patients warrants further study.
ObjectiveTo explore the efficacy of percutaneous pedicle screw internal fixation and minimally invasive lateral small incisions lesion debridement and bone graft fusion via dilated channels in the treatment of lumbar tuberculosis.MethodsThe clinical data of 22 cases of lumbar tuberculosis treated with percutaneous pedicle screw internal fixation combined with dilated channels with minimally invasive lateral small incision lesion debridement and bone graft fusion between January 2016 and June 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 12 males and 10 females, with an average age of 47.5 years (range, 22-75 years). The affected segments were L2, 3 in 5 cases, L3, 4 in 8 cases, and L4, 5 in 9 cases, with an average disease duration of 8.6 months (range, 4-14 months). Preoperative neurological function was classified according to the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA), with 3 cases of grade C, 9 cases of grade D, and 10 cases of grade E. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications were recorded. At preoperation, 3 months after operation, and last follow-up, the C reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimen- tation rate (ESR) were tested to evaluate tuberculosis control; the pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score was used to evaluate the recovery of pain, and the Oswestry disability index (ODI) was used to evaluate the function recovery of the patient’s lower back; the kyphosis Cobb angle was measured, and the loss of Cobb angle (the difference between the Cobb angle at last follow-up and 3 months after operation) was calculated. At last follow-up, the ASIA classification was used to evaluate the recovery of neurological function, and the effectiveness was evaluated according to the modified MacNab standard.ResultsThe operation time was 110-148 minutes (mean, 132.8 minutes) and the intraoperative blood loss was 70-110 mL (mean, 89.9 mL). Two patients experienced fat liquefaction of the incision and delayed healing; the incisions of the remaining patients healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 18-24 months, with an average of 21.3 months. All bone grafts achieved osseous fusion, the pedicle screws were fixed in reliable positions, without loosening, displacement, or broken rods. There was no recurrence of tuberculosis. The ESR, CRP, VAS scores, ODI scores, and kyphosis Cobb angle of the affected segment at 3 months after operation and last follow-up were significantly improved (P<0.05); there were no significant differences between at last follow-up and 3 months after operation (P>0.05), and the loss of Cobb angle was (0.6±0.5)°. The patient’s neurological function recovered significantly. At last follow-up, the ASIA grades were classified into 1 case with grade C, 1 case with grade D, and 20 cases with grade E, which were significantly improved when compared with preoperative grading (Z=−3.066, P=0.002). According to the modified MacNab standard, 16 cases were excellent, 3 cases were good, 2 cases were fair, and 1 case was poor. The excellent and good rate was 86.4%.ConclusionPercutaneous pedicle screw internal fixation combined with dilated channels with minimally invasive lateral small incisions lesion debridement and bone graft fusion has the advantages of less bleeding, less trauma, and faster recovery, which is safe and effective in the treatment of lumbar tuberculosis.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of three-dimensional (3D) printing artificial vertebral body and interbody fusion Cage in anterior cervical disectomy and fusion (ACCF) combined with anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACDF).MethodsThe clinical data of 29 patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy who underwent ACCF combined with ACDF between May 2018 and December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 13 patients were treated with 3D printing artificial vertebral body and 3D printing Cage as 3D printing group and 16 patients with ordinary titanium mesh Cage (TMC) and Cage as TMC group. There was no significant difference in gender, age, surgical segment, Nurick grade, disease duration, and preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and Cobb angle of fusion segment between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization stay, complications, and implant fusion at last follow-up were recorded and compared between the two groups; JOA score was used to evaluate neurological function before operation, immediately after operation, at 6 months after operation, and at last follow-up; VAS score was used to evaluate upper limb and neck pain. Cobb angle of fusion segment was measured and the difference between the last follow-up and the immediate after operation was calculated. The height of the anterior border (HAB) and the height of the posterior border (HPB) were measured immediately after operation, at 6 months after operation, and at last follow-up, and the subsidence of implant was calculated.ResultsThe operation time of 3D printing group was significantly less than that of TMC group (t=3.336, P=0.002); there was no significant difference in hospitalization stay and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (P>0.05). All patients were followed up 12-19 months (mean, 16 months). There was no obvious complication in both groups. There were significant differences in JOA score, VAS score, and Cobb angle at each time point between the two groups (P<0.05). There was an interaction between time and group in the JOA score (F=3.705, P=0.025). With time, the increase in JOA score was different between the 3D printing group and the TMC group, and the increase in the 3D printing group was greater. There was no interaction between time and group in the VAS score (F=3.038, P=0.065), and there was no significant difference in the score at each time point between the two groups (F=0.173, P=0.681). The time of the Cobb angle interacted with the group (F=15.581, P=0.000). With time, the Cobb angle of the 3D printing group and the TMC group changed differently. Among them, the 3D printing group increased more and the TMC group decreased more. At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in the improvement rate of JOA score between the two groups (t=0.681, P=0.502), but the Cobb angle difference of the 3D printing group was significantly smaller than that of the TMC group (t=5.754, P=0.000). At last follow-up, the implant fusion rate of the 3D printing group and TMC group were 92.3% (12/13) and 87.5% (14/16), respectively, and the difference was not significant (P=1.000). The incidence of implant settlement in the 3D printing group and TMC group at 6 months after operation was 15.4% (2/13) and 18.8% (3/16), respectively, and at last follow-up were 30.8% (4/13) and 56.3% (9/16), respectively, the differences were not significant (P=1.000; P=0.264). The difference of HAB and the difference of HPB in the 3D printing group at 6 months after operation and last follow-up were significantly lower than those in the TMC group (P<0.05).ConclusionFor patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing ACCF combined with ACDF, compared with TMC and Cage, 3D printing artificial vertebrae body and 3D printing Cage have the advantages of shorter operation time, better reduction of height loss of fusion vertebral body, and maintenance of cervical physiological curvature, the early effectiveness is better.