Objective To use meta-analysis method to assess the efficacy of fluorine-18fluorode-oxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) (18F-FDG-PET/CT) scan and 99Tcm-methylene diphosphonate (99Tcm-MDP) bone scan (BS) on early diagnosis of bone metastases of cancer. Methods Computer-based retrieval was conducted on MEDLINE, PubMed, EMbase, Ovid, and The Cochrane Library (from their establishment to 2010) to search reports about diagnosing bone metastases of cancer with 18FDG-PET/CT and 99Tcm-MDP Bone Scan. Three reviewers independently selected the studies according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, collected the data, and evaluated the quality. MetaDisc software was adopted to conduct meta-analyses. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated, the summary receiving operating characteristic (SROC) curve was drawn, and the areas under the curve (AUC) and Q were measured. Results Five studies were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that the pooled sensitivity of 18FDG-PET/CT and 99Tcm-MDP BS in the diagnosis of bone metastases was 0.95 (95%CI 0.90 to 0.97) and 0.77 (95%CI 0.71 to 0.83), respectively; the pooled specificity was 0.98 (95%CI 0.97 to 0.99) and 0.90 (95%CI 0.88 to 0.92), respectively; the pooled DOR was 602.81 (95%CI 214.07 to 1697.51) and 41.37 (95%CI 8.15 to 210.05), respectively; the AUC was 0.984 2 and 0.901 7, respectively; and the Q index was 0.945 4 and 0.833 1, respectively. Conclusion The 18F-FDG PET/CT is more effective than the 99Tcm-MDP bone scan in the early diagnosis of bone metastases in cancer.
ObjectiveUtilizing PDCA circulation to enhance the quality of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in whole body bone scan (WBS). MethodsBased on a retrospective analysis of the quality of WBS in the first half of year 2012, advices and measurements to improve the quality were implemented by the technologists. In the following half year of 2012, monthly evaluation of the WBS quality were carried out to further improve the quality by focusing on fine details of the patient positioning, radiopharmaceuticals injection and image processing, etc. ResultsBy utilization of PDCA circulation, WBS quality in the latter half year of 2012 constantly improved. Further more, effective and improved technical procedures were extracted from scattered individual experience, which was expected to improve the WBS quality effectively in the long run. ConclusionApplication of PDCA circulation in SPECT in whole body bone scan improves the image quality, because it not only brings better communication and understanding between patients and physicians/technologists, but also enables better patient preparations and individualized procedures based on standard protocols.
According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, we searched for relevant original articles in some big Chinese and English databases.The qualities of the studies were evaluated with QUADAS quality assessment tool. A software program, Meta-disc, was used to obtain the pooled estimates and heterogeneity test for sensitivity, specificity, SROC curve, and so on. Finally the 17 article were included. On a per-patient basis, the pooled sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR-), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), Q*, SROC area under curve for 99mTc-MDP bone scan and computed tomography (CT) were 0.87 and 0.99, 0.81 and 0.98, 3.88 and 13.86, 0.2 and 0.03, 27.73 and 612.17, 0.8418 and 0.9732, 0.9097 and 0.9952, respectively. On a per-focus basis, the pooled SEN, SPE, LR+, LR-, DOR, Q*, SROC area under curve for 99mTc-MDP bone scan was 0.86, 0.97, 13.32, 0.16, 102.4, 0.8944, 0.9528, respectively. For CT, only 1 article were included. This paper demonstrate: whether 99mTc-MDP or CT both have high diagnostic efficiency for bone metastase of breast cancer.
This paper is aimed to assess the diagnostic value of MRI versus 99Tcm-methylene diphosphonate (99Tcm-MDP) bone scan (BS) for osseous metastases in patients with prostate cancer. The computer-based retrieval was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, EBSCO, Web of Knowledge, the Cochrane Library and Ovid data bases to search for trials about diagnosing osseous metastases of prostate cancer with MRI and 99Tcm-MDP BS. Selected with time acceptance and time exclusion criteria, the data quality were evaluated with QUADAS quality assessment tool and collected. We used the Meta-Disc software to conduct meta-analysis, and then calculated the pooled sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), drew the summary receiving operating characteristic (SROC) curve, and measured the area under curve (AUC) and Q* value. Then five studies were included, involving 353 patients. The pooled sensitivity of MRI and BS was 0.95 (95% CI 0.90~0.98) and 0.67 (95% CI 0.58~0.75), respectively. The pooled specificity was 0.97 (95% CI 0.94~0.99) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.83~0.91), respectively. The pooled DOR was 402.99 (95% CI 119.05~1 364.15) and 23.85 (95% CI 1.32~431.48), respectively. The AUC was 0.990 1 and 0.624 1, respectively. The Q* was 0.958 7 and 0.593 8. It can well be concluded that MRI is more effective than 99Tcm-MDP BS in the diagnosis of osseous metastases in patients with prostate cancer.