Objective To investigate whether preoperative T1 slope (T1S) in MRI can predict the changes of cervical curvature after expansive open-door laminoplasty (EOLP) in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy, so as to make up for the shortcomings of difficult measurement in X-ray film. Methods The clinical data of 36 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy who underwent EOLP were retrospectively analysed. There were 21 males and 15 females with an average age of 55.8 years (range, 37-73 years) and an average follow-up time of 14.3 months (range, 12-24 months). The preoperative X-ray films at dynamic position, CT, and MRI of cervical spine before operation, and the anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films at last follow-up were taken out to measure the following sagittal parameters. The parameters included C2-C7 Cobb angle and C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (C2-C7 SVA) in all patients before operation and at last follow-up; preoperative T1S were measured in MRI, and the patients were divided into larger T1S group (T1S>19°, group A) and small T1S group (T1S≤19°, group B) according to the median of T1S, and the preoperative T1S, C2-C7 Cobb angle, C2-C7 SVA, and the C2-C7 Cobb angle and C2-C7 SVA at last follow-up, difference in axial distance (the difference of C2-C7 SVA before and after operation), postoperative curvature loss (the difference of C2-C7 Cobb angle before and after operation), the number of patients whose curvature loss was more than 5° after operation, and the number of patients whose kyphosis changed (C2-C7 Cobb angle was less than 0° after operation). Results The C2-C7 Cobb angle at last follow-up was significantly decreased when compared with preoperative value (t=8.000, P=0.000), but there was no significant difference in C2-C7 SVA between pre- and post-operation (t=–1.842, P=0.074). The preoperative T1S was (19.69±3.39)°; there were 17 cases in group A and 19 cases in group B with no significant difference in gender and age between 2 groups (P>0.05). The preoperative C2-C7 Cobb angle in group B was significantly lower than that in group A (t=–2.150, P=0.039), while there was no significant difference in preoperative C2-C7 SVA between 2 groups (t=0.206, P=0.838). At last follow-up, except for the curvature loss after operation in group B was significantly lower than that in group A (t=–2.723, P=0.010), there was no significant difference in the other indicators between 2 groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Preoperative larger T1S (T1S>19°) in MRI had a larger preoperative lordosis angle, but more postoperative physiological curvature was lost; preoperative T1S in MRI can not predict postoperative curvature loss, but preoperative larger T1S may be more prone to kyphosis.
ObjectiveTo compare differences in the maintenance of cervical curvature after anterior cervical surgery between zero-profile and self-locking intervertebral cage and plate-cage construct (PCC).MethodsA clinical data of 100 patients with single-segment cervical disc herniation who were treated with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion were retrospectively analyzed between January 2015 and January 2016. Among them, 50 patients were treated with the zero-profile and self-locking intervertebral cage (group A) and 50 patients with the PCC (group B). There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, gender, bone mineral density, disease duration, operative segment, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, C2-7 cervical curvature, segmental Cobb angle, and adjacent vertebral height (P>0.05). The operation time and intraoperative blood loss were recorded. The postoperative VAS and JOA scores were used to evaluate the clinical efficacy. The C2-7 cervical curvature, segmental Cobb angle, and adjacent vertebral height were measured on lateral X-ray films, and the interbody fusion was evaluated according to Pitzen’s criteria.ResultsThe operation time in group A was significantly shorter than that in group B (t=2.442, P=0.021), but there was no significant difference in the intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (t=0.812, P=0.403). All patients were followed up 24-36 months, with an average of 28.5 months. According to Pitzen’s criteria for cervical interbody fusion, bone fusion achieved in both groups. The VAS score, JOA score, C2-7 cervical curvature, segmental Cobb angle, and adjacent vertebral height of the two groups at 1 and 24 months after operation were significantly improved when compared with those before operation (P<0.05). The C2-7 cervical curvature, segmental Cobb angle, and adjacent vertebral height of group A at 24 months changed significantly compared with those at 1 month (P<0.05). The other indexes of the two groups showed no significant difference between the different time points after operation (P>0.05). There were significant differences in C2-7 cervical curvature, segmental Cobb angle, and adjacent vertebral height between the two groups at 24 months after operation (P<0.05); but there was no significant difference in the clinical indexes at 1 and 24 months and the imaging indexes at 1 month between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionCompared with the PCC, the zero-profile and self-locking intervertebral cage can significantly shorten the operation time and obtain the same clinical efficacy, but the intervertebral height loss and secondary cervical curvature change after operation is more serious.
ObjectiveTo investigate the relationship between O-EA angle and lower cervical curvature in patients with anterior atlantoaxial dislocation undergoing occipitocervical fusion, and to analyze the effect of O-EA angle on lower cervical curvature.MethodsThe clinical data of 61 patients with anterior atlantoaxial dislocation undergoing occipitocervical fusion who were admitted between April 2010 and July 2018 and met the selection criteria were retrospectively analyzed. There were 32 males and 29 females, with an age of 14-76 years (mean, 50.7 years). The fixed segment included 19 cases of C0-C2, 27 cases of C0-C3, 14 cases of C0-C4, and 1 case of C0-C5. The O-EA angle, C2-7 Cobb angle, and T1 tilt angle were measured before operation and at last follow-up. According to the O-EA angle measured at last follow-up, the patients were divided into <95° group (group A), 95°-105° group (group B), and >105° group (group C), and compared the differences of gender, age, fixed segment (short segment was at C3 and above, long segment was beyond C3), and C2-7 Cobb angle. Correlation analysis between the O-EA angle and C2-7 Cobb angle before operation and at last follow-up, as well as the changes of O-EA angle and C2-7 Cobb angle between before operation and at last follow-up were analyzed.ResultsAll 61 patients were followed up 12-24 months, with an average of 22.4 months. There was no significant difference in O-EA angle, C2-7 Cobb angle, and T1 tilt angle before operation and at last follow-up (P>0.05). According to the last follow-up O-EA angle grouping, there were 14 cases in group A, 29 cases in group B, and 18 cases in group C. There was no significant difference in age, gender composition, and fixed segment composition among the three groups (P>0.05); the differences in C2-7 Cobb angles among the three groups were significant (P<0.05), groups A, B, and C showed a gradually increasing trend. The O-EA angle was positively correlated with C2-7 Cobb angle before operation and at last follow-up (r=0.572, P=0.000; r=0.618, P=0.000); O-EA angle change at last follow-up was also positively correlated with C2-7 Cobb change (r=0.446, P=0.000).ConclusionThe O-EA angle of patients with anterior atlantoaxial dislocation is positively correlated with C2-7 Cobb angle. Too large O-EA angle should be avoided during occipitocervical fixation, otherwise it may accelerate the degeneration of the lower cervical spine.