Objective To evaluate the efficacy of preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision （TME） in treatment for locally advanced lower rectal cancer. Methods The clinical data of 31 patients with locally advanced lower rectal cancer received concurrent chemoradiotherapy from January 2009 to December 2011 in this hospital were analyzed retrospectively. Conventional fraction radiotherapy with total dose 50 Gy and chemotherapy with mFOLFOX6 or CapeOX regimen were taken. The efficacy was assessed by recording results of clinical and pathological examination. The function of sphincter was also recorded. Results All 31 patients underwent TME operation. The complication morbidity and mortality was 12.9% （4/31） and 3.2% （1/31），respectively. As a result of the preoperative management，the tumor was reduced by an average of 21.9%， down-regulation of T stage was observed in 48.4% （15/31） patients，the frequency of lymph node metastasis decreased from 83.9% （26/31） to 38.7% （12/31）. Pathological complete response was observed in 5 patients （16.1%） and the total response rate was 74.2% （23/31），grade 3/4 toxicity was occurred in 2 （6.5%） patients. 84.6% （22/26） of patients underwent sphincter preservation surgery reserved good function of sphincter. Conclusions Preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with TME in treatment for locally advanced lower rectal cancer is effective and safe，which can lead to pathological complete response，decrease the tumor stage and the rate of lymph node metastasis，and can also increase the efficacy of operation.
Objective To explore the safety of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy combined with sphincter-preserving operation in treatment of locally advanced low rectal cancer. Methods The clinical data of thirty-four patients admitted into our hospital between June 2007 and June 2009 with T3 and T4 low rectal cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and sphincter-preserving operation were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Routine fraction of radiation was given with total dose of 40 Gy, five times a week, 2 Gy per fraction. Patients received oxaliplatin （150 mg/d1）, plus folinic (100 mg/d1-3) and 5FU (750 mg/d1-3) for total 1 cycles started from the 4th week of irradiation. Operation was performed 4 weeks after neoadjuvant therapy. Results After neoadjuvant therapy, all patients underwent surgical resection with average tumor size decreased by 41.2%, tumor T stage decreased in 67.6% （23/34) patients, and lymph nodenegative change rate was 58.8% (10/17). One patient had liver metastasis and one had local recurrence, but without stomal leak. And 88.2% (30/34) patients showed good function of sphincter. Conclusions Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in advanced lower rectal cancer patients has shown its efficacy in down-staging, which is safe without increasing operation complications when combined with sphincterpreserving surgery.
Objective To discuss the important role of preoperative chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of mid-low rectal cancer. Methods From the surgical point of view, the evidences from clinic trials in literatures of recent years and also from the results of our single institution were analyzed. Results Preoperative radiotherapy with total dosage of 50 Gy had showed more and more advantages in the past two decades. Preoperative radiotherapy with concomitant chemotherapy had definite effects in downing stage and improving local control, while its role in sphincter preserving kept in controversy. However, this combined preoperative therapies had not improved long-term survival in rectal cancer. By now, there were no proper indicators to predict the effects of therapies. Conclusion Preoperative chemoradiotherapy is still the only way to improve the rate of R0 resection and decrease the rate of local currence after surgery for patients with mid-low advanced rectal cancer.
ObjectiveTo investigate effect of carbon nanoparticles on number of lymph nodes harvested in radical operation of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. MethodsOne hundred and five patients diagnosed with low and middle rectal cancer and received radical operation after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from March 1, 2014 to October 31, 2015 were included. Thirtysix patients were injected with carbon nanoparticles by colonoscopy before surgery and were classified as study group, and the rest patients were classified as control group. According to the same principle of surgery and procedure of pathological specimen handling, the effect of carbon nanoparticles on lymph node harvested in resected specimens was analyzed. ResultsThe total lymph nodes harvested were 764 in the study group and 1 242 in the control group. Among them, the metastatic lymph nodes were 19 in the study group, 58 in the control group. Although the average lymph nodes harvested in each patient had no significant difference between the study group and the control group (21.22±7.13 versus 18.00±9.84, t=1.739, P=0.085), the proportion of patients with 12 or more than 12 lymph nodes harvested in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group [88.9% (32/36) versus 71.0% (49/69), χ2=4.287, P=0.038]. The ratio of patients with metastatic lymph nodes [27.8% (10/36) versus 33.3% (23/69), χ2=0.339, P=0.561] and the average metastatic lymph nodes harvested in each patient (1.90±1.29 versus 2.52±2.33, t=0.788, P=0.437) all had no significant differences between the study group and the control group. ConclusionThe injection of carbon nanoparticles by colonoscopy before surgery could increase detection rate of 12 or more than 12 lymph nodes in resected specimens of patients who were diagnosed with low and middle rectal cancer and received radical operation after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
Objective To investigate efficacy and toxicity of XELOX or FOLFOX4 regimen as neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy for stage Ⅱ/Ⅲ middle and low rectal cancer. Methods From June 2011 to March 2014, 120 patients with stage Ⅱ/Ⅲ middle and low rectal cancer who underwent the surgical treatment were enrolled in The Fifth People’s Hospital of Qinghai Province, then were randomly divided into radiotherapy+FOLFOX4 regimen group and radiotherapy+XELOX regimen group. The radiotherapy and chemotherapy were performed simultaneously before the radical resection of rectal cancer. Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy: 1.8–2.0 Gy/times, 5 times/week, a total of 25 times, the total dose was 45.0–50.0 Gy. At the same time, 2 cycles of chemotherapy were performed according to the FOLFOX4 program (oxaliplatin+leucovorin+5-fluorouracil) or XELOX regimen (capecitabine tablet+oxaliplatin). The radical surgery was performed on 4 to 8 weeks after the preoperative chemoradiotherapy, then 8 to 12 cycles of FOLFOX4 chemotherapy and 4 to 6 cycles of XELOX chemotherapy were completed in the radiotherapy+FOLFOX4 regimen group and the radiotherapy+XELOX regimen group respectively on 1 month after the radical surgery. The curative effect and the occurrence of acute toxicity were observed. Results ① There were no significant differences in thegeneral data such as the gender, age, cT stage, cN stage, TNM stage, histological type, differentiation degree, etc. between the two groups(P>0.05). ② The reduced staging rates of cT and cN in the radiotherapy+XELOX regimen group was 63.3% (38/60) and 86.7% (52/60), respectively, which was significantly higher than that in the radiotherapy+FOLFOX4 regimen group〔38.3% (23/60) and 53.3% (32/60), respectively〕 , the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). ③ The complete response rate and the effective rate (complete response rate+partial response rate) in the radiotherapy+XELOX regimen group were significantly higher than those in the radiotherapy+FOLFOX4 regimen group (P<0.05). ④ The overall 3-year survival rate in the radiotherapy+XELOX regimen group was significantly higher than that in the radiotherapy+FOLFOX4 regimen group (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the 3-year disease-free survival rate, distant metastasis rate, and local recurrence rate between the two groups (P>0.05). ⑤ All the patients suffered from 3 to 4 degrees toxicities, however, the incidence rates of the overall toxicity and the diarrhea toxicity in the radiotherapy+XELOX regimen group were significantly lower than those in the radiotherapy+FOLFOX4 regimen group (P<0.05). Conclusion Preliminary results of limited cases in this study show that XELOX regimen is more effective and less acute toxicity than FOLFOX4 regimen for preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy for patients with stage Ⅱ/Ⅲ middle and low rectal cancer.
Objective To evaluate the effects of neoadjuvant long-course chemoradiotherapy (CRT), neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy (SCRT), and total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) on chemoradiotherapy related complications and perioperative safety in mid-low rectal cancer patients. Methods The clinical data of 63 rectal cancer patients who received neoadjuvant (chemo) radiotherapies and surgery treatment in West China Hospital from Jul. 2014 to Feb. 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the neoadjuvant regimen, the patients were divided into CRT group (n=15), SCRT group (n=30), and TNT group (n=18), and then the effects of these 3 kinds of neoadjuvant regimen on chemoradiotherapy related complications and perioperative safety were compared. Results ① Chemoradiotherapy related complications: among all the included 63 patients, 29 patients (46.0%) occurred chemoradiotherapy related complications, including radiation enteritis in 9 patients and bone marrow suppression in 25 patients. There were significant differences in the overall incidence of chemoradiotherapy related complications, incidence of radiation enteritis and bone marrow suppression (P≤0.001). The overall incidence of chemoradiotherapy related complications and incidence of bone marrow suppression of SCRT group were lower. ② Perioperative safety: no significant differences were found in the incidence of surgical complications, incidence of specific surgical complication, operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative flatus time (P<0.05), but there was significant difference in the postoperative hospital stay among 3 groups (P=0.033), the postoperative hospital stay of SCRT group was shorter. Conclusion CRT, SCRT, and TNT have similar effect on the safety in the mid-low rectal cancer patients, which suggests that SCRT is worthy of further research and promotion.
Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for locally advanced esophageal cancer. Methods We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 56 consecutive patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer treated by neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery in our hospital between January 2015 and December 2016. There were 51 males and 5 females. The patients were divided into 2 groups. Neoadjuvant therapy followed by open surgery esophagectomy group was as an OE group with 25 patients aged 61 (50-73) years. And neoadjuvant therapy followed by MIE was as a MIE group with 31 patients aged 60 (55-79) years. Results The pathologic complete response (pCR) rate of 28 patients with neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy was significantly higher than that of 28 patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (21.4% vs. 10.7%, P<0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, R2 rate and the number of lymph nodes dissection in the MIE group were obviously better than those of the OE group with statistical differences (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the number of resected lymph nodes along the bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerves and lymph node metastasis rate (P>0.05) between the two groups. The incidence of postoperative respiratory complications in the MIE group was lower than that of the OE group (P=0.041). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of other complications, re-operation, re-entry to ICU, median length of stay or perioperative deaths (P>0.05). There was only one patient with neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the OE group died due to gastric fluid asphyxia caused by trachea-esophageal fistula. Conclusion Neoadjuvant therapy followed by MIE for locally advanced esophageal cancer is safe and feasible. The oncological outcomes seem comparable regardless of OE.
Objective To compare efficacy of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery in treatment of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Methods The relevant literatures were retrieved from databases including CNKI, CBM, Wanfang, VIP, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase from 2007 to 2017, all the relevant randomized controlled trial (RCT) or non-randomized controlled trial (NRCT) of laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery in patients with rectal cancer were collected according to the inclusion and exclusion criterial. Two reviewers independently screened the literatures, extracted the data, and assessed the bias risk of the included studies. Then, the meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Results A total of 11 RCTs and 9 NRCTs involving 2 036 patients with rectal cancer were included, of these, including 1 021 cases of laparoscopic surgery and 1 015 cases of open surgery. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the operation time was increased ［WMD=14.21, 95% CI (1.92, 26.51)］, the intraoperative blood loss ［WMD=–38.96, 95% CI (–60.29, –7.63)］, first postoperative exhaust time ［WMD=–0.86, 95% CI (–1.14, –0.57)］, first postoperative intake food time ［WMD=–0.89, 95% CI (–1.15, –0.62)］, and postoperative hospitalization time ［WMD=–2.38, 95% CI (–3.44, –1.32)］ were reduced in the laparoscopic surgery as compared with the open surgery; the rate of the sphincter-saving was increased ［OR=2.35, 95% CI (1.67, 3.30)］, the rates of the local recurrence ［OR=0.25, 95% CI (0.13, 0.47)］, postoperative overall complications ［OR=0.34, 95% CI (0.26, 0.43)］, infection of incision ［OR=0.39, 95% CI (0.25, 0.62)］, intestinal obstruction ［OR=0.30, 95% CI (0.17, 0.53)］, lung infection ［OR=0.32, 95% CI (0.18, 0.57)］, and anastomotic fistula ［OR=0.40, 95% CI (0.22, 0.73)］ were decreased in the laparoscopic surgery as compared with the open surgery; the intraoperative lymph node resection ［WMD=–0.99, 95% CI (–2.11, 0.12)］, the rates of the 3-year disease-free survival ［OR=0.91, 95% CI (0.54, 1.54)］, pelvic infection ［OR=0.64, 95% CI (0.17, 2.45)］, anastomotic bleeding ［OR=0.54, 95% CI (0.22, 1.34)］, urinary retention ［OR=0.71, 95% CI (0.34, 1.48)］, and urinary tract infection ［OR=1.22, 95% CI (0.45, 3.30)］ had no significant differences between these two surgeries. Conclusion Laparoscopy surgery is still safer, more effective, and more reliable than conventional open surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer, but it needs more clinical RCTs to further provide accurate and reliable results.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of the interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and surgery on the clinical outcome of esophageal cancer.MethodsPubMed and EMbase databases from inception to March 2018 were retrieved by computer. A random-effect model was used for all meta-analyses irrespective of heterogeneity. The meta-analysis was performed by RevMan5.3 software. The primary outcomes were operative mortality, incidence of anastomotic leakage, and overall survival; secondary outcomes were pathologic complete remission rate, R0 resection rate, and positive resection margin rate.ResultsA total of 17 studies with 18 173 patients were included. Among them, 13 were original studies with 2 950 patients, and 4 were database-based studies with a total of 15 223 patients. The results showed a significant positive correlation between the interval and operative mortality (Spearman coefficient=0.360, P=0.027). Dose-response meta-analysis revealed that there was a relatively better time window for surgery after nCRT. Further analysis for primary outcomes at different time cut-offs found the following results: (1) when the time cut-off point within 30-70 days, the shorter interval was associated with a reduced operative mortality (7-8 weeks: RR=0.67, 95% CI 0.55-0.81, P<0.05; 30-46 days: RR=0.63, 95%CI 0.47-0.85, P<0.05; 60-70 days: RR=0.64, 95%CI 0.48-0.85, P<0.05); (2) when the time cut-off point within 30-46 days, the shorter interval correlated with a reduced incidence of anastomotic leakage (RR=0.39, 95%CI 0.21-0.72, P<0.05); when the time cut-off point within 7-8 weeks, the shorter interval could achieve a critical-level effect of reducing the incidence of anastomotic leakage (RR=0.73, 95%CI 0.52-1.03, P>0.05); (3) when the time cut-off point within 7-8 weeks, increased interval significantly was associated with the poor overall survival (HR=1.17, 95% CI 1.00-1.36, P<0.05). Secondary outcomes found that the shorter interval could significantly reduce the positive resection margin rate (RR=0.53, 95% CI 0.38-0.75, P<0.05) when time cut-off point within 56-60 days.ConclusionShortening the interval between nCRT and surgery can reduce the operative mortality, the incidence of anastomotic leakage, long-term mortality risk, and positive resection margin rate. It is recommended that surgery should be performed as soon as possible after the patient's physical recovery, preferably no more than 7-8 weeks, which supports the current study recommendation (within 3-8 weeks after nCRT).
ObjectiveTo make a comprehensive review of the value of radiomics for prediction of therapeutic responses to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).MethodRelevant literatures about the therapeutic response evaluation of LARC by using radiomics were collected to make an review.ResultRadiomics had good predictive value in terms of complete pathologic response (pCR) and treatment effectiveness of NCRT in patients with LARC.ConclusionRadiomics, a new imaging diagnostic technique, plays an important role in the prediction of the efficacy of NCRT in LARC.