Objective To investigate the effectiveness and adverse effect of the absorbable fixation system on cranial bone flap reposition and fixation after craniotomy. Methods Between July 2010 and December 2011, 67 cases underwent cranial bone flap reposition and fixation with absorbable fixation system after craniotomy and resection of intracranial lesions. There were 38 males and 29 females with a median age of 32 years (range, 5 months to 73 years). The disease duration ranged from 3 months to 6 years (median, 25 months). Forty-one lesions were located at supratentorial and 26 at subtentorial, including at the frontotemporal site in 13 cases, at the frontoparietal site in 12 cases, at the temporal oprietal site in 8 cases, at the temporooccipital site in 5 cases, at the occipitoparietal site in 4 cases, and at the posterior cranial fossa in 25 cases. The diagnosis results were glioma in 15 cases, cerebral vascular diseases (aneurysm, arteriovenous malformation, and cavemous angioma) in 8 cases, meningioma in 7 cases, arachnoid cyst in 7 cases, acoustic neurinoma in 5 cases, cholesteatoma in 3 cases, primary trigeminal neuralgia in 5 cases, cerebral abscess in 3 cases, hypophysoma in 2 cases, craniopharyngioma in 2 cases, metastatic tumor in 2 cases, radiation encephalopathy in 2 cases, medulloblastoma in 1 case, ependymocytoma in 1 case, germinoma in 1 case, atypical teratoma/rhabdoid tumor in 1 case, facial spasm in 1 case, and subdural hematoma in 1 case. Intracranial lesion size ranged from 3 cm × 2 cm to 7 cm × 5 cm. The changes of local incision and general condition were observed. Results Subcutaneous effusion occurred in 2 supratentorial lesions and 3 subtentorial lesions, which was cured at 2 weeks after puncture and aspiration. All incisions healed primarily and no redness or swelling occurred. CT scans showed good reposition of the cranial bone flap and smooth inner and outer surfaces of the skull at 2 weeks after operation. All 67 patients were followed up 3-20 months (mean, 10.3 months). During follow-up, the skull had satisfactory appearance without discomfort, local depression, or effusion. Moreover, regular CT and MRI scans showed no subside, or displacement of the cranial bone flap or artifacts. Conclusion Absorbable fixation system for reposition and fixation of the cranial bone flap not only is simple, safe, and reliable, but also can eliminate the postoperative CT or MRI artifact caused by metals fixation system.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of large trauma craniotomy on severe traumatic brain injury. MethodsA total of 132 cases of severe traumatic brain injury adopted large trauma craniotomy between July 2008 and August 2013, and the clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. ResultsAccording to the results of GOS assessment at discharge, 67 patients (50.75%) were satisfied, 26 (19.70%) were mildly disable, 10 (7.58%) were severely disable, 12 (9.09%) were in vegetative state, and 17 (12.88%) were dead. ConclusionCorrect use of large trauma craniotomy on severe brain injury cases will help to improve the treatment outcome, reduce complications and improve quality of survival.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy between key hole approach versus large trauma craniotomy for patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage. MethodsSuch databases as The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2013), PubMed, EMbase, WangFang Data, CNKI and VIP was searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on key hole approach versus large trauma craniotomy for patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage from January 2005 to June 2013. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2. ResultsA total of 13 studies involving 1 324 patients was included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, key hole approach was superior to large trauma craniotomy with significant differences in the fatality rate (OR=0.29, 95%CI 0.19 to 0.45, P < 0.000 01), incidence of postoperative complications (OR=0.35, 95%CI 0.21 to 0.57, P < 0.000 1), recovery time of consciousness (MD=-4.52, 95%CI-5.84 to-3.20, P < 0.000 01), neurologic impairment score after 1-month treatment (MD=-12.63, 95%CI-16.36 to-8.90, P < 0.000 01), total effectiveness (OR=3.79, 95%CI 2.54 to 5.66, P < 0.000 01), and postoperative living ability (ADL Grade I, Ⅱ). ConclusionKey hole approach is better than large trauma craniotomy for patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, the abovementioned conclusion still needs to be verified by conducting more high quality studies, especially conducting multicenter blinding RCTs with large sample-size.
ObjectivesTo explore the efficacy and prognostic factors of neuroendoscopic intracerebral hematoma evacuation in the treatment of hypertension-related intracerebral hemorrhage.MethodsA total of 122 patients with hypertension-related intracerebral hemorrhage treated in our hospital from October 2015 to May 2019 were categorized into experimental group (n=62) and control group (n=60). The experimental group was treated with endoscopic intracerebral hematoma removal, while the control group was treated with traditional craniotomy. The operative indexes, postoperative recovery, serum endothelin, IL-6, CRP levels and the incidence of postoperative complications were observed and compared between the two groups, and the relevant factors affecting the prognosis of patients undergoing neuroendoscopic intracerebral hematoma evacuation were analyzed.ResultsThe operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hematoma clearance rate, ICU treatment time, the volume of brain edema 7 days after operation, the postoperative intracranial pressure, NIHSS score and ADL score in experimental group were significantly superior to those in control group. The levels of serum endothelin, IL-6 and CRP in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group after operation. The incidence of complications in the experimental group was lower than that in control group. Univariate analysis showed that the prognosis of patients undergoing neuroendoscopic evacuation of intracerebral hematoma was significantly correlated with the history of hypertension, preoperative GCS score, the amount of bleeding and whether been broken into the ventricle (P<0.05), but not with age, sex and location of hemorrhage (P>0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the history of hypertension above 10 years, blood loss above 50 mL, intraventricular rupture and preoperative GCS score were the risk factors affecting the prognosis of patients undergoing neuroendoscopic intracerebral hematoma evacuation.ConclusionsCompared with traditional craniotomy, neuroendoscopic evacuation of intracerebral hematoma has the advantages of better curative effect and lower incidence of postoperative complications in the treatment of hypertension-related intracerebral hemorrhage. The history of hypertension above 10 years, bleeding volume above 50 mL, breaking into the ventricle and preoperative GCS score are the risk factors affecting the prognosis of patients undergoing neuroendoscopic intracerebral hematoma evacuation.
Objective To investigate the accuracy of preoperative three-dimensional reconstruction of tumor in craniotomy for supratentorial convex brain tumors, and to provide an accurate and safe auxiliary method for craniotomy. Methods Patients with supratentorial convexity brain tumors who were admitted to the Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Yibin Hospital, Sichuan University between April 2018 and November 2020 were prospectively enrolled and randomly divided into reconstruction group and control group. In the reconstruction group, preoperative three-dimensional reconstruction of the tumor was used for craniotomy positioning, while in the control group, traditional two-dimensional tomographic imaging was used. The basic conditions, intraoperative localization and tumor exposure satisfaction rate, maximum diameter of bone window, operation time, cerebral draining vein injury, and postoperative subcutaneous effusion or intracranial infection were compared between the two groups. Results A total of 43 patients were included, 22 in the reconstruction group and 21 in the control group. There was no significant differences in age, gender composition, incidence of midline shift, tumor growth site and tumor size between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of cerebral drainage vein injury and postoperative subcutaneous effusion or intracranial infection between the two groups (P>0.05). The satisfaction rate of intraoperative positioning and tumor exposure in the reconstruction group (95.5% vs. 66.7%) was higher than that in the control group, the maximum diameter of the bone window [(6.26±1.32) vs. (7.31±1.13) cm] and the operation time [(194.00±22.76) vs. (214.57±26.53) min] were lower than the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusions Preoperative three-dimensional reconstruction helps to locate the tumor more accurately, improves the satisfaction rate of tumor exposure, reduces the diameter of the craniotomy window, and shortens the operation time. Compared with traditional two-dimensional tomographic positioning, it has more advantages.
Objective To explore the application methods and values of using health failure mode and effect analysis (HFMEA) to prevent surgical site infection (SSI) in patients undergoing bone fracture and craniotomy surgery with class Ⅰ incision. Methods Patients undergoing bone fracture and craniotomy surgery with class Ⅰ incision at the Chengdu Pidu District People’s Hospital between January 2020 to December 2021 were selected. Based on whether receiving HFMEA-based risk management or not, the patients were divided into conventional group and intervention group. The compliance rates with infection control measures, changes in risk priority numbers (RPN) at various stages (1 month and 10 months after intervention) of HFMEA implementation, and the incidence of SSI between the conventional group and the intervention group were compared. Results A total of 884 surgeries were included. Among them, there were 399 cases in the conventional group and 485 cases in the intervention group; 16 cases SSI occurred. A total of 7 SSI prevention and control measures had been formulated. Except for proper surgical attire (P＞0.05), there were statistically significant differences in the compliance rate of the other prevention and control measures between the two groups of patients (P＜0.05). In the intervention group, the RPN values of pre-operative, intra-operative, and post-operative risk factors at the 10th month after intervention were all lower than those at the 1st month after intervention (P<0.05). Except for the incidence of SSI during craniotomy surgery (6.1% vs. 1.8%, P=0.375), there were statistically significant differences in the total SSI incidence (3.3% vs. 0.6%) and bone fracture surgery SSI incidence (2.7% vs. 0.5%) between the conventional group and the intervention group (P>0.05). Conclusion Applying HFMEA-based risk management techniques to prospectively identify, assess, analyze, manage and track the risk of SSI in bone fracture and craniotomy surgery with class Ⅰ incision can effectively enhance the adherence of preventive measures and reduce the incidence rate of SSI.