Objective To investigate the perioperative outcome of robot-assisted pulmonary lobectomy in treating pathological stage Ⅰ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 333 consecutive p-T1 NSCLC patients who underwent robotic-assisted pulmonary lobectomy in our hospital between May 2013 and April 2016. There were 231 females (69.4%) and 102 males (30.6%) aged from 20–76 (55.01±10.46) years. Cancer was located in the left upper lobectomy in 37 (11.1%) patients, left lower lobectomy in 71 (21.3%) patients, right upper lobectomy in 105 (31.5%) patients, right middle lobectomy in 32 (9.6%) patients, right lower lobectomy in 88 (26.4%) patients. Adenocarcinoma was confirmed in 330 (99.1%) patients and squamous cell cancer was confirmed in 3 (0.9%) patients. Results Total operative time was 46–300 (91.51±30.80) min. Estimated intraoperative blood loss was 0–100 ml in 319 patients (95.8%), 101–400 ml in 12 patients (3.6%), >400 ml in 2 patients (0.6%). Four patients were converted to thoracotomy, including 2 patients due to pulmonary artery branch bleeding and 2 due to pleural adhesion.No patient died within 30 days after surgery. And no perioperative blood transfusion occurred. Postoperative day 1 drain was 0–960 (231.39±141.87) ml. Chest drain time was 2–12 (3.96±1.52) d.And no patient was discharged with chest tube. Length of hospital stay after surgery was 2–12 (4.96±1.51) d. Persistent air leak was in 12 patients over 7 days. No readmission happened within 30 days. All patients underwent lymph node sampling or dissection with 2–9 (5.69±1.46) groups and 3–21 (9.80±3.43) lymph nodes harvested. Total intraoperative cost was 60 389.66–134 401.65 (93 809.23±13 371.26) yuan. Conclusion Robot-assisted pulmonary lobectomy is safe and effective in treating p-Stage Ⅰ NSCLC, and could be an important supplement to conventional VATS. Regarding to cost, it is relatively more expensive compared with conventional VATS. RATS will be widely used and make a great change in pulmonary surgery with the progressive development of surgical robot.
Objective To summarize the clinical experience of da Vinci surgical system in treatment for senile patients with severe obstructive jaundice．Methods From January 2009 to May 2011, 209 patients with hepatopancreatobiliary （HPB） diseases underwent robotic surgeries by using da Vinci surgical system. Forty-seven senile patients with severe obstructive jaundice were selected for robotic surgery （robot group） and 44 for open surgery（open group）.The distribution of disease, pro-, intra-, and post-operative data in the two groups were analyzed. Results Baseline of two groups was same. A total of 46 patients had underwent total robotic surgeries （97.87%，46/47） and 1 patient converted to hand-assisted procedure （2.13%，1/47）. Surgeries included all HPB difficult surgical procedures, also including 1 case of hilar cholangiocarcinoma patient who had high level serum bilirubin （375μmol/L）and underwent emergency resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma and portal-jejunal Roux-en-Y anastomosis． Postoperative complications occurred in 7 cases （14.89%, 7/47） and 1 case died （2.13%, 1/47） . Three-month survival rate was 78.15%. Fifteen-day and 3-month after surgery, physical strength score was 42.87±18.61 and 58.51±23.86, respectively. The total length of abdominal incision was （6.30±1.70） cm. All the patients in the open group completed surgery, including emergency operation in 4 cases. Postoperative complications occurred in 13 cases （29.55%, 13/44） and 2 cases died （4.55%, 2/44）.Three-month survival rate was 72.36%. Fifteen-day and 3-month after surgery, physical strength score was 37.15±13.64 and 45.27±18.96, respectively. The total length of abdominal incision was （26.73±3.07） cm. There were significant differences of postoperative complications, postoperative 15-day and 3-month physical strength score, and incision length between two groups（P＜0.05）. Conclusions da Vinci surgical system is safe and effective in treatment for senile patients with severe obstructive jaundice.
ObjectiveTo summarize the clinical experience of 180 general surgeries under da Vinci surgical system. MethodsFrom January 2009 to October 2010, 180 patients with hepatopancreaticobiliary and gastrointestinal disease underwent robotic surgeries by using da Vinci surgical system. The case distribution, intra-and post-operative data were analyzed. ResultsA total of 171 patients had underwent total robotic surgeries and nine patients converted to hand-assisted procedure (5.0%, 9/180). The surgery for hepatic portal was performed in 63 cases of patients, including surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma in 36 cases, gallbladder carcinoma in 10 cases, complex calculus of intrahepatic duct in 12 cases, and iatrogenic biliary duct injury in 5 cases. The pancreatic surgery was performed in 44 cases of patients, including pancreatoduodenectomy in 16 cases, distal pancreatectomy in 6 cases, medial pancreatectomy in 1 case, pancreatic cyst-jejunum anastomosis in 1 case, and palliative surgery in 20 cases. Hepatic surgery was in 19 cases and gastrointestinal surgery in 12 cases of patients. Other procedures were in 42 cases of patients, including common bile duct exploration and removing the stone, retroperitoneal lymph nodes dissection, and splenectomy, etc. All of ten cases of patients with obstructive suppurative cholangitis received emergency surgery by the robot and postoperative infection symptoms were controlled, and shock was corrected quickly. No death occurred during the perioperative period. Postoperative complications occurred in 12 cases (6.7%, 12/180) and 2 cases died (1.1%, 2/180). Conclusionsda Vinci surgical system can carry out all kinds of general surgery, especially complicated and difficult hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery, which improves the development of minimally invasive surgery.
ObjectiveTo summarize the clinical experience of 58 operations for biliary malignant tumor with da Vinci surgical system. MethodsFrom January 2009 to October 2010, 180 patients with hepatopancreaticobiliary and gastrointestinal disease underwent robotic surgeries by using da Vinci surgical system, including 58 patients with biliary malignant tumor. The case distribution, intra and postoperative data were analyzed. ResultsOf 58 patients, 3 patients with intrahepatic bile duct cystadenocarcinoma received wedge resections of liver. In 36 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma, anatomical left hemihepatectomies were performed in 3 cases, resection of extrahepatic duct and gallbladder bridge type biliary revascularization in 3 cases, resection of extrahepatic duct and biliary-enteric Roux-en-Y anastomosis in 14 cases, tumor resection and revascularization of hepatic portal bile duct in 1 case, palliative external drainage of intrahepatic bile duct in 5 cases, and Y-internal drainage of hepatic portal in 10 cases. In 10 patients with gallbladder carcinoma, resection of extrahepatic duct and gallbladder and biliaryenteric Roux-en-Y anastomosis in 2 cases, cholecystectmy in 3 cases, cholecystectmy and external drainage of intrahepatic bile duct in 1 case, cholecystectmy and Y-internal drainage by suspension of hepatic portal in 4 cases. A patient with middle bile duct cancer received radical resection of cholangiocarcinoma and biliary-enteric Roux-en-Y anastomosis. Of 8 patients with distal bile duct cancer, Whipple procedure were performed. Of 58 patients, 2 cases converted to hand-assistant procedure (3.4%). For all patients, operation time was (6.18±1.71) h, blood loss was (116.66±56.06) ml, blood transfusion was (85.55±38.28) ml, ambulation time was (9.10±2.91) h, feeding time was (14.95±4.35) h, and hospital stay was (12.81±4.29) d. Postoperative complications occurred in 8 cases (13.8%), including bile leakage (3 cases), wound bleeding (1 case), pancreatoenteric anastomotic leakage (2 cases), pulmonary infection (1 case), and renal failure (1 case). Of these 8 cases, 6 cases recovered smoothly and 2 cases die of severe pulmonary infection and renal failure after conservative treatment (3 or 4 weeks), therefore, the mortality of patients was 3.4%. In 36 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma, 19 cases died (on 2 monthes 4 cases, on 6 monthes 5 cases, on 10 monthes 8 cases, and on 12 monthes 2 cases after operation), 11 cases survival well (gt;26 monthes 4 cases, gt;22 monthes 3 cases, and gt;19 monthes 4 cases), and 6 cases required hospitalization. Of 10 patients with gallbladder carcinoma, 7 cases died (on 3 monthes 1 case, on 5 monthes 1 case, on 8 monthes 1 case, on 11 monthes 3 cases, and on 12 monthes 1 case after operation) and 3 cases survival (gt;17 monthes 2 cases, gt;13 monthes 1 case). In 8 cases undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy, 5 cases died (on 4 monthes 2 cases, on 6 monthes 2 cases, and 10 monthes 1 case after operation) and 3 cases survived well over 2 years. Three patients with intrahepatic bile duct cystadenocarcinoma survived over 1 year. Conclusionsda Vinci surgical system can carry out all kinds of surgery for biliary malignant tumor, especially prominent in the complicated surgeries for hepatic portal, which breaks through the restricted area of laparoscope in hepatobiliary malignant tumor.
ObjectiveTo discuss the feasibility, safety, and superiority of da Vinci surgery system (DVSS) in liver tumor resection. MethodThe clinical data of 21 patients who underwent DVSS in the liver tumor resection were analyzed retrospectively. ResultsThere were 12 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), 1 patient with cholang-iocellular carcinoma, 1 patient with hepatic cirrhosis regenerative nodule, 2 patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma, 2 patients with leiomyosarcoma, and 3 patients with cavernous hemangioma.The operative time was (156.67±92.19) min (60-480 min), the intraoperative blood loss was (585.71±1 076.12) mL (50-5 000 mL), the time of diet recovery was (3.23±1.26) d (2-6 d), and the hospital stay was (10.10±9.02) d (5-47 d).The hospital mortality and morbidity rates were 0(0/21) and 9.52%(2/21) respectively including 1 patient with biliary leakage and 1 patient with abdominal infection. ConclusionThis study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of DVSS in the liver tumor resection and the system has a wide range of application for patients who are suffering from liver tumor.
ObjectiveTo summarize our initial experience in robot-assisted left upper lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer. MethodsFour patients with non-small cell lung cancer underwent robot-assisted left upper lobectomy with da Vinci S surgical system (Intuitive Surgical, California) in General Hospital of Shenyang Military Area Command between March and August 2013. There were 3 male and 1 female patients, and their age was 58.8 years (range:49-67 years). We used general anesthesia with double lumens trachea cannula. The patients set in right lateral decubitus position with jackknife. We used 3 arms of the robot system. A single direction lobectomy procedure or an anatomic lobectomy procedure was used according to the differentiation of fissure. Systemic lymph node dissection was performed for all patients. ResultsFour patients with left upper lobectomy were completed with total robotic procedure without conversion. Postoperative pathological examination showed all the patients were of all adenocarcinoma with 2 patients inⅠA stage and 2 patients inⅢA stage. The range of operating time was 100-150 min, intraoperative blood loss was 30-80 ml and no blood transfusion was needed for the patients. The drainage time was 6-20 days. All of the 4 patients were discharged smoothly. The patients were followed up for 10-15 months without recurrence or metastasis. ConclusionRobot-assisted left upper lobectomy is safe and feasible for non-small cell lung cancer.
ObjectiveTo review the current status of da Vinci surgical system in vascular surgery. MethodsRecent literatures published in Chinese or English about the application of da Vinci surgical system in vascular surgery were reviewed and analyzed. Resultsda Vinci surgical system was mainly applied in diseases such as aortoiliac occlusive disease, aneurysm, typeⅡ endoleak after endovascular aortic repair, celiac artery compression syndrome, and so on. It was used to expose arteries, or assist to ligate and dissect arteries. da Vinci surgical system showed apparent advantages in shorting the time of aortic clamping, however, the high cost, the loss of tactile feedback, and the long learning curve may be its shortcomings. Conclusionda Vinci surgical system is safe and effective in vascular surgery, while much more experience is required to evaluate its long-term effect and complication.
ObjectiveTo explore the efficacy of da Vinci robotic surgical system-assisted radical resection of rectal cancer. MethodsThe clinical data of 456 patients who received radical resection of rectal cancer by the da Vinci robotic surgical system at the Southwest Hospital from March 2010 to March 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Operative time, operative blood loss, number of harvested lymph nodes, hospital stay, and morbidity were evaluated. Resultsda Vinci robotic surgical system-assisted radical resection of rectal cancer were successfully carried out in 445 patients, and other 11 patients were converted to open surgery (2.4%). Of 456 patients, 322 patients underwent anterior resection of rectum procedure (70.6%), 126 patients underwent abdominoperineal excision procedure (27.6%), 8 patients underwent Hartmann procedure (1.8%). The mean operative time was (192±60) min, the mean operative blood loss was (110±93) mL, the mean number of harvested lymph nodes were 19±6, the mean length between distal resection margin and tumor were (3.5±1.8) cm, the mean time for patients taking normal activity was (2.9±1.5) d, the mean time of passage of the first flatus was (2.7±1.7) d, the mean hospital stay was (7.1±1.6) d. Surgical complications occurred in 40 patients (8.8%), and all the patients were recovery before leaving hospital. The mean follow-up time was 29.1-month (3-75 months). There were 70 patients suffered from occurrence or metastasis (16.2%), and 60 patients died (13.9%). Conclusionda Vinci robotic surgical system-assisted radical resection for rectal cancer is a feasible and safe surgical procedure with the minimal trauma, fast recovery, and satisfactory clinical efficacy.
Objective To investigate the learning curve for da Vinci robot-assisted mediastinal tumor resection (DRMTR). Methods A total of 50 consecutive patients received DRMTR between March 2011 and September 2012 in our hospital. Clinical data of the 50 patients were collected and analyzed. There were 23 males, 27 females aged 46.9(17–80) years. The learning curve was evaluated by using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis. Results The mean operation time was 124.6 min. The CUSUM learning curve was best modeled as a third-order polynomial curve with the equation: CUSUM=0.046×case-number3–4.681×case-number2+127.508×case-number–237.940, which had a highR2 value of 0.868. The fitting curve reached the top after the 19th case, which suggested that the surgeons master the technique after they finished 19 cases. As a cut-off point, the 19th case divided the learning curve into two phases, in which there was statistical diffference in operation time (P<0.01), intraoperative blood loss (P<0.01), the postoperative duration of chest tube drainage (P<0.01 ) and the rate of postoperative complications (P<0.05 ). Conclusion The DRMTR identified by CUSUM analysis represents two characteristic stages of DRMTR: the learning stage and the mastery stage. It is suggested from our data that the surgeons need finish about 19 cases to master DRMTR.
ObjectiveTo summarize the surgical learning curve and evaluate the effectiveness, safety and feasibility of the robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) by comparing with the conventional vedio-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS).MethodsThe clinical data of 40 patients receiving robotic assisted thoracoscopic anatomic lung resection from March to June 2016 in our department were reviewed. There were 29 males and 11 females with the age of 54-78 (60.2±12.7) years in the RATS group, and 27 males and 10 females with the age of 52-76 (58.7±11.5) years in the VATS group. Lung space-occupying lesions were comfirmed by preoperative diagnosis. The operative time, blood loss, chest tube retention time, postoperative hospital stay and perioperative morbidity and mortality were analyzed. The safety and feasibility were evaluated, and the learning curve was summed up.ResultsOperative time, postoperative ventilation time, intraoperative blood loss, chest tube retention time, postoperative pain, average hospital stay, postoperative complication rate between two groups were not statistically significant. In the RATS group preoperative preparation time was longer than that of the VATS group (24.5 min vs. 15.6 min, P=0.003), and the rate of conversion to thoracotomy of the RATS group was lower than that of the VATS group (0 vs. 10.8%). There was no perioperative death in two groups.ConclusionRobotic-assisted thoracic surgery is safe and effective in the early learning process, and the learning curve can be entered into the standard stage from the learning stage after initial 10 operations.