ObjectivesTo summarize the latest advances about definition, classification, and TNM stage of adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG).MethodThe available guidelines, consensuses, international conference proceedings, and clinical studies were reviewed and summarized.ResultsThe AEG trended to be an independent entity of malignant tumor at the special location. The previous misunderstanding of AEG definitions from the WHO needed to be corrected and unified in China. The Siewert classification was still a practical clinical approach to guiding treatment strategy, while the new draft of JGCA classification needed to be evaluated and verified in the clinical practice. By contrast, the 8th edition AJCC/UICC classification was relatively controversial in the guiding treatment strategies, mainly due to the staging system, surgical approach, and extent of lymphadenectomy of Siewert Ⅱ type AEG. Based on the available research results, the TNM staging system of the 8th edition of gastric cancer tended to be more reasonable for the Siewert Ⅱ and Ⅲ types AEG.ConclusionWith increasing incidence of AEG, more experimental and clinical studies on AEG are ongoing, and it is expected to have more optimized classification and exclusive staging system for AEG in future.
Transcranial electric stimulation (TES) is a non-invasive, economical, and well-tolerated neuromodulation technique. However, traditional TES is a whole-brain stimulation with a small current, which cannot satisfy the need for effectively focused stimulation of deep brain areas in clinical treatment. With the deepening of the clinical application of TES, researchers have constantly investigated new methods for deeper, more intense, and more focused stimulation, especially multi-electrode stimulation represented by high-precision TES and temporal interference stimulation. This paper reviews the stimulation optimization schemes of TES in recent years and further analyzes the characteristics and limitations of existing stimulation methods, aiming to provide a reference for related clinical applications and guide the following research on TES. In addition, this paper proposes the viewpoint of the development direction of TES, especially the direction of optimizing TES for deep brain stimulation, aiming to provide new ideas for subsequent research and application.
ObjectiveTo review the advancement made in the understanding of valgus impacted proximal humeral fracture (PHF). MethodsThe domestic and foreign literature about the valgus impacted PHF was extensively reviewed and the definition, classification, pathological features, and treatment of valgus impacted PHFs were summarized. Results PHF with a neck shaft angle ≥160° is recognized as a valgus impacted PHF characterized by the preservation of the medial epiphyseal region of the humeral head, which contributes to maintenance of the medial periosteum’s integrity after fracture and reduces the occurrence of avascular necrosis. Therefore, the valgus impacted PHF has a better prognosis when compared to other complex PHFs. The Neer classification designates it as a three- or four-part fracture, while the AO/Association for the Study of Internal Fixation (AO/ASIF) categorizes it as type C (C1.1). In the management of the valgus impacted PHF, the selection between conservative and surgical approaches is contingent upon the patient’s age and the extent of fracture displacement. While conservative treatment offers the advantage of being non-invasive, it is accompanied by limitations such as the inability to achieve anatomical reduction and the potential for multiple complications. Surgical treatment includes open reduction combined with steel wire or locking plate and/or non-absorbable suture, transosseous suture technology, and shoulder replacement. Surgeons must adopt personalized treatment strategies for each patient with a valgus impacted PHF. Minimally invasive surgery helps to preserve blood supply to the humeral head, mitigate the likelihood of avascular necrosis, and reduce postoperative complications of bone and soft tissue. For elderly patients with severe comminuted and displaced fractures, osteoporosis, and unsuitable internal fixation, shoulder joint replacement is the best treatment option. ConclusionCurrently, there has been some advancement in the classification, vascular supply, and management of valgus impacted PHF. Nevertheless, further research is imperative to assess the clinical safety, biomechanical stability, and indication of minimally invasive technology.
ObjectiveTo summarize the terms and definitions related to neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) with a view to standardizing and unifying the existing terminology system. Methods To review the research literature related to NF1 at home and abroad, and to summarize the expressions of the disease and related terms. Results There are still some limitations in the current knowledge of NF1, especially in the expression of the terminology, and there are discrepancies in the description and naming of NF1-related features in different medical literatures and clinical guides. There are differences in the description and naming of NF1-related features in different medical literature and clinical guidelines. Through a systematic review of the literature, this paper provides a detailed compendium and summary of the terms and definitions of NF1-related clinical manifestations, pathological features, and genetic types, and further standardizes and unifies existing diagnostic criteria and terminology systems. ConclusionThe terms and definitions of NF1-related clinical manifestations are summarized to enhance the knowledge of clinicians and researchers related to NF1.