Objective To explore the correlation between overweight, obesity and incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods Databases including PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2012), CNKI, VIP, CBM and WanFang Data were searched from inception to May, 2012 to collect the cohort studies on the correlation between overweight, obesity and incidence of T2DM. The studies were screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria by two researchers independently, the quality was evaluated, the data were extracted, and then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1 and Stata 11.0 software. Results A total of 8 studies involving 101 864 participants were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with the normal weight population, the onset risk of T2DM was obviously higher in the overweight (RR=2.59, 95%CI 2.11 to 3.19, Plt;0.000 01), and obese (RR=6.28, 95%CI 4.99 to 7.91, Plt;0.000 01) populations. In the subgroup analysis, the onset risk of T2DM was higher in the western obese population (RR=6.91, 95%CI 5.59 to 8.56) than the eastern obese population (RR=4.19, 95%CI 2.93 to 5.99). Based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE), the quality of the included studies on T2DM developed by overweight and obesity was low and medium respectively. Conclusion Overweight and obesity can increase the onset risk of T2DM which is higher in the female and western obese populations than the male and eastern obese populations respectively.
Objective To evaluate the effects of saxagliptin on β cell function of type 2 diabetic patients. Methods The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, CBM, VIP, and CNKI were searched from their establishment to November, 2011, for relevant randomized controlled trials on the effects of saxagliptin on β cell function in type 2 diabetic patients. Language was limited to Chinese and English only. Two reviewers independently screened the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted the data, and evaluated and cross-checked the methodological quality. Then meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.0 software. Results Five RCTs were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: HOMA-B was significantly increased in the saxagliptin (or saxagliptin plus routine treatment) 2.5 mg, 5 mg, and 10 mg groups (MD=8.03, 95%CI 4.57 to 11.48, Plt;0.000 01; MD=7.50, 95%CI 4.27 to 10.73, Plt;0.000 01; MD=17.45, 95%CI 13.93 to 20.97, Plt;0.000 01); HOMA-IR was similar between saxagliptin 2.5 or 10 mg group, and control group (MD= –0.05, 95%CI –0.18 to 0.08, P=0.47; MD= –0.18, 95%CI –0.60 to 0.24, P=0.4). Conclusion Current evidence shows that saxagliptin is effective in improving β cell function and insulin resistance. Due to short follow-up and small sample size, this conclusion has to be further proved by more high-quality RCTs.
Objective To systematically evaluate the effectiveness of frequently-used bariatric surgery versus conventional medical therapy for obese patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods Such databases as The Cochrane Library (Issue 12, 2012), PubMed, CNKI, CBM, VIP and WanFang Data were searched to collect the randomized controlled trails (RCTs) about frequently-used bariatric surgery vs. conventional therapy for obese patients with type 2 diabetes. The retrieval time was from inception to May, 2012. Two reviewers independently screened the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted the data, and evaluated the quality. Then the meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1.2 software. Results A total of three RCTs involving 340 patients were included finally. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with conventional medical therapy, bariatric surgery could improve the diabetes remission, decrease both glycated hemoglobin level and patient’s weight. At the same time, the postoperative complications were fairly mild. Conclusion Frequently-used bariatric surgery is superior to conventional medical therapy when treating obese patients with type 2 diabetes, and it deserves to be recommended in clinic. However more studies are required to further confirm this conclusion because of the quality and quantity limitation of the included studies.
Objective To investigate the current situation of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in Sichuan province, and to analyze the influencing factors of SMBG, so as to provide evidence for improving the level of SMBG. Methods By the convenience sampling method, 410 patients with T2DM for more than 1 year were selected from 17 hospitals and community health service centers in 7 cities across Sichuan province, and their SMBG was investigated with a questionnaire. Results Among 410 eligible patients, the average frequency of SMBG was 7.3 times per month. There were 268 patients (65.4%) performed SMBG less than 4 times per month, 94 (22.9%) performed 4-15 times per month, 29 (7.1%) performed 6-29 times per month, and 19 (4.6%) performed over 30 times per month. Just 234 patients (57.1%) monitored the HbA1c in the past 6 months. FPG, 2-hour PPG and HbA1c were negatively correlated with the frequency of SMBG. The influencing factors of SMBG were insulin treatment and education. Conlusion The SMBG status in D2TM patients is relatively poor in Sichuan province, and the compliance of SMBG is expected to be improved by enhancing diabetic education.
Objective To assess the effects and safety of sitagliptin combined with metformin in treating type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP and CBM were searched to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on sitagliptin combined with metformin in treating Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) from inception to November, 2012. References of included studies were also retrieved. Two reviewers independently screened studies according to exclusion and inclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1 software. Results 7 RCTs involving 2 917 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with metformin alone, sitagliptin combined with metformin effectively improved HbA1c levels (WMD= –0.62%, 95%CI –0.76 to –0.47, Plt;0.000 1) and fasting plasma glucose levels (WMD= –0.7 mmol/L, 95%CI –1.03 to –0.37, Plt;0.000 01), and increased insulin sensitivity and β-cell function. But there was no significant difference between the two groups in the incidences of gastrointestinal reactions and hypoglycemia. Conclusion Compared with using metformin alone, sitagliptin combined with metformin can improve glycemic control, enhance insulin sensitivity and better β-cell function more effectively and both have a similar effect on weight lose, but there is no significant difference he incidences of gastrointestinal reactions and hypoglycemia. The above conclusion should be verified by more large-scale high-quality studies in future due to the limitations of the methodological quality and sample size of the included studies.
Objective To systematically review the effectiveness of empowerment education in patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods Databases including The Cochrane Library (Issue 12, 2012), PubMed, Ovid, EMbase, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, CBM, digital journals of the Chinese Medical Association and Google Scholar were electronically searched for the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on empowerment education in patients with type 2 diabetes from inception to January 2013. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software. Results A total of seven RCTs involving 749 Type 2 diabetic patients were finally included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with the control group, the empowerment education group was better in decreasing HbA1c levels, with a significant difference (MD= –0.27, 95%CI –0.51 to –0.03, P=0.03), but no significant difference was found between the two groups in improving body mass index (BMI) (MD= 0.25, 95%CI –1.07 to 1.57, P=0.71). Conclusion The program of empowerment education could improve HbA1c levels of diabetic patients, patients’ knowledge and illness attitudes on diabetes mellitus, but its influence on patients’ BMI, LDL and self-efficacy is still unclear.
Objective To assess the effectiveness of intensive versus routine education on diabetes mellitus for preventing diabetic foot ulcer. Methods We electronically searched CENTRAL (Issue 1, 2013), PubMed (1978-2013), EMbase (1978-2013), VIP (1989-2013) and WanFang Data (1980-2013), hand-searched correlated proceedings and retrieved the references of included studies, for the randomized controlled trials on intensive versus routine education on diabetes mellitus for preventing diabetic foot ulcer all over the world. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software. Results Twelve trials involving 1 841 patients were finally included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: a) the incidence of diabetic foot ulcer in the intensive education group was lower than the routine group, with a significant difference (RR=0.51, 95%CI 0.30 to 0.84, P=0.008); b) two groups were alike in the amputation rate, with no significant difference (OR=0.54, 95%CI 0.17 to 1.67, P=0.28); and c) the score of knowledge on diabetes mellitus was higher in the intensive education group than in the routine education group, with a significant difference (MD=7.32, 95%CI 3.57 to 11.06, P=0.000 1). Conclusion Current evidence shows that: compared with routine education, intensive education could reduce the incidence of diabetic foot ulcer effectively. However, the above conclusion should be verified by conducting more high quality studies.
Objective To systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of berberine in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Methods The databases including The Cochrane Library, PubMed (1966 to October 2011), Excerpta Medica Database (EMbase, 1974 to October 2011), Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases (CNKI, 1994 to October 2011), the Chinese Scientific and Technical Journals database (VIP, 1989 to October 2011), and China Doctor Dissertation Full-text Database (CDFD, 1979 to 2011) and China Master Dissertation Full-text Database (CMFD, 1979 to 2011) were searched. The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on berberine in the treatment of type 2 diabetes were screened according to the inclusive and exclusive criteria. The data were extracted, the quality was assessed, and the systematic review was conducted by using Revman 5.0 software. Results Ten RCTs involving 647 Chinese patients with DM 2 were included, and the quality of each study was generally low. The interventions in the treatment groups were berberine or combined with metformin or glipizide. The control groups included placebo, lifestyle intervention, pioglitazone, rosiglitazone or metformin. Because the experiment and control groups in each included trials were different in drug type and dose, disease duration, and treatment regimens, only the results of all trials were reported rather than performing Meta-analysis. The berberine group was superior to the placebo and lifestyle intervention groups in lowering fasting blood glucose (FBG), but it was not so obviously effective in lowering the postprandial blood glucose (PBG), hemoglobin A1c and BMI and regulating lipid metabolism compared with the placebo, lifestyle intervention, and western hypoglycemic agents. In addition, the berberine treatment had no side effects of hypoglycemia although a few patients complained of gastrointestinal adverse reaction, and there was no significant difference when compared with the placebo and lifestyle intervention groups. Conclusion Berberine is effective in lowering FBG, but not better than metformin, glipizide and rosiglitazone. It is undefined in decreasing PBG, HbA1c, BMI and regulating lipid metabolism, and it will not lead to hypoglycemia except for a few and mild gastrointestinal adverse effects. The current clinical studies on berberine for DM 2 are low in methodology and reporting quality, which has to be further proved by more high-quality clinical trails.
Due to the complexity of etiology and a lot of complication of diabetes mllitus, the reliable conclusion of studies of etiology and treatment of diabtets mellitus should rely on randomized controlled trial and systematic review. Alongside the development of meta-analysis, systematic reviewes have provided many beneficial information, including gene mutation and diabetes mellitus, evaluation of risk factors, diagnostic test and treatment of diabets mellitus.
Objective To demonstrate the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of domestic Acarbose tablet compared with Glucobay (Acarbose tablet produced by Bayer company) in patients with type 2 diabetic patients. Method A multicenter randomized controlled parallel-group comparison study was conducted. 177 Chinese type 2 diabetic patients were recruited from 4 clinical centers. The patients were divided randomly into domestic Acarbose tablet (A group) or Glucoby (B group) treatment group. The trial consisted of a 2-4 weeks equilibrated period followed by an 8 week course of treatment. Results 165 patients have finished the trial (81 in A group and 84 in B group). After 4 weeks of treatment, the mean of fasting blood glucose (FBG) in A and B group were reduced 1.61 and 2.08 mmol/L respectively, and mean of postprandial blood glucose (PBG) lowered 5.06 and 5.09mmol/L respectively. After 8 weeks of treatment, the mean of FBG were reduced 1.95 and 2.62mmol/L respectively, and mean of PBG lowered 4.88 and 5.98 mmol/L, respectively, and mean of HbA1c were lowered 1.13% and 1.20% respectively in A and B group. The differences in reduction of FBG, PBG, and HbA1c between A and B group were no statistic significance. The serum triglyceride levels and BMI were decreased significantly in both A, B groups. 3 patients who drinking wine during trial on A group had asymptomatic elevations in serum transaminases that normalized in 2 weeks after stopped drinking and Acarbose withdrawal. Flatulence was the most common side effect. Conclusions In this multicenter study, domestic Acarbose tablet 50 mg t.i.d. was an effective, safe, and generally well-tolerated therapy as similar as Glucobay in type 2 diabetic patients.