Objective To summarize the clinical experiences of various types of the second dorsal metacarpal artery (SDMA) flap for hand reconstruction. Methods From 1988 to 2003, 139 SDMA flaps were transferred for hand injuries. The flaps were used in 5 types according to vascularization and technique in transplantation:orthograde pedicled island SDMA flaps in 37 cases (cutaneous in 24and teno-cutaneous in 13), retrograde pedicled island SDMA flaps in 25 cases(cutaneous in 19 and teno-cutaneous in 6),double pivot SDMA flaps in 36 cases(cutaneous in 28 and teno-cutaneous in 8), distal perforator branch pedicledflaps in 19cases (cutaneous in 16 and composite in 3), free SDMA flaps in 22 cases (cutaneous in 15 and composite in 7). The skin islands were 3.0 cm×1.5 cm to 6.3 cm×5.0 cm in size. Results Of the 139 flaps, 135 flaps survived completely, 3 survived partially, and1 failed in the operation because of intractable vascular spasm. Follow-up wasdone in 116 cases for 12 to 57 months. The flap had good texture and color match. The twopoint discrimination was 5 to 9 mm in 78 sensate flaps, while it was 10 to 15 mm in 38 nonsensate flaps. In 21 tenocutaneous flaps, the TAM score of range of motion was 60% to 70% of the healthy side. Conclusion The SDMA flap has a constant and reliable vessel and a thin, pliable, and good-quality skin. It is versatile in creatingcomposite flaps. It is a good flap resource for hand and finger reconstruction.
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of the second dorsal metacarpal artery fascial vascular pedicle retrograde island flap relaying the dorsal island flap of the index finger in repairing skin and soft tissue defects of the thumb. Methods The clinical data of 8 patients with skin and soft tissue defects of thumb between October 2019 and January 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 3 males and 5 females with an average age of 35 years (range, 18-52 years). The causes of injury included machine injury in 2 cases, crush injury in 3 cases, and cutting injury in 3 cases. There were 2 cases of dorsal defect of the proximal part, 1 dorsal defect of the distal part, and 5 instances of the distal part defect. The skin and soft tissue defects ranged from 1.7 cm×1.4 cm to 3.0 cm×2.5 cm. The time from injury to flap repair was 7-21 days, with an average of 14 days. Firstly, the dorsal island flap of the index finger (dorsal side of the proximal part of the index finger) was used to repair the defect of the thumb. Then the second dorsal metacarpal artery fascia vascular pedicle retrograde island flap (near the radial side of the back of the hand) was used to repair the dorsal defect of the index finger; the donor site was sutured directly. ResultsVascular crisis of the flap occurred in 1 case within 48 hours after operation, and the flap was bloated and bruised in 1 case due to excessive suture tension, and all the flaps survived after symptomatic treatment; partial skin margin of the flap was necrotic in 1 case after operation, and the incision healed after dressing change; the other 5 flaps survived, and all the wounds in the donor and recipient sites healed by first intention. All the 8 patients were followed up 3-10 months, with an average of 6 months. One patient had mild scar; the other patients had no significant difference in the color of the flap and the surrounding skin, no adhesion of tendons, and little interference of index finger function, and there was no obvious pain and dysfunction in the donor and recipient sites of the flap. At last follow-up, the extension-flexion range of motion of the metacarpophalangeal joint of the thumb was 0°-55°, and that of the interphalangeal joint was 0°-75°; the extension-flexion range of motion of the metacarpophalangeal joint of the index finger was 0°-82°, that of the proximal interphalangeal joints was 0°-90°, and that of the distal interphalangeral joints was 0°-65°. Conclusion The application of the second dorsal metacarpal artery fascial vascular pedicle retrograde island flap relaying the dorsal island flap of the index finger to repair skin and soft tissue defect wounds of thumb is a feasible treatment with reliable blood supply, less postoperative complications, no need for skin grafting, less interference to the function of the index finger, and satisfactory wound repair effect.
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of the perforator-based propeller flaps (PPFs) based on digital artery (DA) and dorsal metacarpal artery (DMA) in repairing hand wounds. Methods The clinical data of 45 patients with hand wounds between January 2018 and March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 27 males and 18 females with an average age of 41.2 years (range, 14-72 years). The causes of injury included twist injury in 15 cases, crush injury in 19 cases, and cut injury in 11 cases. The injured parts included 32 cases of digits, 10 cases of dorsal hand, and 3 cases of palmar hand, all of which had tendon, joint, and bone exposure. The time from injury to operation ranged from 2 to 8 hours (mean, 4.3 hours). The wound sizes after debridement ranged from 1.8 cm×1.0 cm to 5.0 cm×3.5 cm. Twenty-eight cases were repaired by the PPFs based on DA and 17 cases were repaired by the PPFs based on DMA. The flap size ranged from 2.5 cm×1.1 cm to 8.5 cm×4.0 cm. The defects of the donor sites in 14 patients were closed directly and the defects in the left 31 patients were resurfaced with free full-thickness skin graft from the proximal medial forearm.Results All the flaps survived after operation. Two cases of the PPF based on DA and 1 case of the PPF based on DMA underwent partially blisters at the distal end and healed after dressing change. The incisions in the donor site healed by first intention and the skin grafts survived. All patients were followed up 10-33 months, with a mean of 15.4 months. At last follow-up, the static two-point discrimination of the PPFs based on DA and DMA were 4-14 mm and 8-20 mm with the averages of 8.1 mm and 13.3 mm, respectively. According to the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire, 20 patients were very satisfied with the appearance of the PPF based on DA and 8 patients were satisfied; 8 patients were very satisfied with the appearance of the PPF based on DMA and 9 patients were satisfied. Based on the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), the appearance scores of the donor site of the PPFs based on DA and DMA were 2-7 and 4-9, with the averages of 4.2 and 6.1, respectively. ConclusionThe two kinds of PPFs are reliable in blood supply and easy to harvest, which provide a good method for emergency repair of small and medium area wounds in the hand.