west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "fibular fracture" 3 results
  • APPLICATION OF ONE STAGE VACUUM SEALING DRAINAGE COMBINED WITH BI-PEDICLE SLIDING FLAP TRANSPLANTATION FOR OPEN TIBIOFIBULAR FRACTURE AND SOFT TISSUE DEFECTS OF THE LOWER LEG

    ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of one stage vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) combined with bi-pedicle sliding flap transplantation in repairing open tibiofibular fracture and soft tissue defects of the lower leg. MethodsTwenty-five patients with open tibiofibular fracture and soft tissue defects of the lower leg were treated by VSD combined with bi-pedicle sliding flap transplantation between January 2012 and July 2014. There were 18 males and 7 females, aged 12-65 years (mean, 35.2 years). The injury causes included traffic accident injury (20 cases), falling injury from height (3 cases), and heavy pound injury (2 cases). The left side was involved in 14 cases, the right side in 8 cases, and both sides in 3 cases. According to Gustilo classification, injury was rated as type II (6 lower extremities), type III a (19 lower extremities), and type III b (3 lower extremities). The anterior tibial defect area after debridement ranged from 6 cm×3 cm to 12 cm×5 cm. The course of injury and admission was 1-18 hours (mean, 4.5 hours). An anterior tibial bi-pedicle sliding flap of 24 cm×6 cm to 48 cm×8 cm was designed to cover the wound and tibia fracture was fixed with minimally invasive internal fixation. After suturing the anterior tibial wound without tension, the flap was transferred forward. The exposed fibula was fixed with reconstruction plate. The remained wound was covered by VSD. Continuously antibiotic saline irrigation was applied postoperatively. After 15 days, the VSD dressing was removed and free skin graft was used to cover the remained wound. ResultsAfter the VSD dressing was removed, the wounds and tension-reduced wound of 18 lower extremities completely healed. Unhealing wounds were covered by skin graft in 9 lower extremities. Infection occurred in 1 lower extremity and was cured after treated with antibiotics. All the wounds healed and flaps survived. The patients were followed up 6-24 months (mean, 18 months). The fractures union was confirmed by X-ray and the average union time was 3.2 months (range, 2.5-5 months). ConclusionThe application of one stage VSD combined with bi-pedicle sliding flap transposition is a simple and safe treatment regimen for Gustilo type II-IIIa open tibiofibular fracture and soft tissue defects of the lower leg. It has the advantages of few complications and low costs, short hospitalization, and good effectiveness.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Application of Taylor spatial frame combined with computer-assisted closed reduction in the treatment of tibiofibular fractures

    ObjectiveTo explore the effectiveness of Taylor spatial frame (TSF) in the treatment of tibiofibular fractures and computer-assisted closed reduction.MethodsThe clinical data of 30 cases of tibiofibular fractures with soft tissue injury treated with TSF between January 2015 and September 2017 was retrospectively analyzed. According to different reduction methods, the patients were divided into control group (15 cases, open reduction in TSF external fixation) and trial group (15 cases, closed reduction in 1-3 days after TSF external fixation). There was no significant difference in the general data such as gender, age, affected side, cause of injury, AO classification of fracture, time from injury to operation between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing time, and removal time of external fixator were recorded and compared between the two groups. At 3 months after removal of external fixator, the limb function was evaluated according to Johner-Wruhs criteria for evaluating the final effect of tibial shaft fracture treatment.ResultsBoth groups were followed up 9-16 months, with an average of 14 months. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing time, and removal time of external fixator in the trial group were significantly shorter than those in the control group (P<0.05). There were 2 cases of superficial infection of the external fixation (1 case in each group), 1 case of incision infection (control group), 1 case of delayed fracture healing (control group), 2 cases of traumatic arthritis (1 case in each group); no significant difference was found in the incidence of complications between the two groups (χ2=0.370, P=0.543). The wounds of soft tissue defect healed by the first intension in both groups. At 3 months after removal of the external fixator, the limb function results in the trial group were excellent in 3 cases, good in 9 cases, fair in 2 cases, and poor in 1 case, and the excellent and good rate was 80.0%; in the control group, the results were excellent in 3 cases, good in 8 cases, fair in 3 cases, and poor in 1 case, and the excellent and good rate was 73.3%. There was no significant difference in incidence of complication between the two groups (χ2=0.917, P=0.821).ConclusionCompared with intraoperative open reduction, postoperative computer-aided closed reduction can shorten the operation time, reduce the intraoperative blood loss, reduce the risk of long-term operation, avoid to destroy the blood supply of fracture end, shorten the healing time of fracture and the wearing time of stent, and alleviate the pain of patients after TSF treatment of tibiofibular fracture.

    Release date:2019-01-25 09:40 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Progress in diagnosis and treatment of fibular fracture in ankle fracture

    Objective To summarize the diagnosis and treatment of fibular fracture in ankle fracture. MethodsRelevant literature at home and abroad in recent years was widely consulted, and various types of fractures were discussed and summarized according to Danis-Weber classification. ResultsConservative treatment is not an ideal treatment for type A avulsion fracture. The operation method should be determined according to the position and size of bone mass. For simple type B fracture, both conservative treatment and surgical treatment can achieve good results. When the position of type C fracture is high and does not affect the stability of ankle joint, it can be treated conservatively, while when the position is low and affects the stability of ankle joint, it needs surgical treatment. ConclusionFirst of all, whether the fibular fracture in the ankle fracture is stable or not should be determined. Whether it is treated surgically or not, the purpose is to restore the tibiofibular syndesmosis and restore the motor function of the ankle.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content