ObjectiveTo observe the effect of health education on hand, foot and mouth disease knowledge of the parents and their psychological status, in order to provide a reference for regulating clinical intervention measures. MethodsBetween October 2011 and February 2013, self-made questionnaire was used to survey the parents of 286 children with hand, foot and mouth disease for their knowledge about the disease. We promoted health education including distributing pamphlets, holding lectures, and carrying out psychological counseling. Then, parents' knowledge and their psychological status were compared before and after the implementation of health education. ResultsAfter health education, parents' suspicion, anxiety, fear, indulgence in children and other negative psychological scores were significantly lower than those before intervention (P<0.05). Their knowledge on the disease was also significantly enhanced (P<0.05). Gender, age and educational background were the main influence factors for health education. ConclusionMulti-form comprehensive health education can enhance parents' knowledge on hand, foot and mouth disease effectively and alleviate various negative psychological situations, which assists them to participate in the treatment work actively, thus greatly promotes early rehabilitation of the child patients.
ObjectTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) for children with severe hand, foot and mouth disease in China. MethodDatabases including CNKI, CBM, WanFang Data, PubMed and The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2015) were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about IVIG combined with conventional therapy versus conventional therapy alone for severe hand, foot and mouth disease from inception to March 2015. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 and Stata 9.0 software. ResultA total of 23 RCTs involving 2271 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with the conventional therapy group, the IVIG group had higher total effective rate (RR=1.18, 95%CI 1.11 to 1.26, P<0.00001), shorter fever relieving time (MD=-1.47, 95%CI -1.80 to -1.15, P<0.00001), shorter rash regression time (MD=-1.61, 95%CI -2.51 to -0.71, P=0.0005), shorter remission time of nervous symptoms (MD=-2.14, 95%CI -3.02 to -1.25, P<0.00001), shorter mouth ulcer regression time (MD=-1.36, 95%CI -2.27 to -0.4, P=0.004), and shorter average length of hospital stay (MD=-2.46, 95%CI-3.29 to -1.63, P<0.00001). ConclusionCompared with conventional therapy alone, IVIG combined with conventional therapy can improve the effect for severe hand, foot and mouth disease. Due to the limited quality of the include studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.