Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for more than 80% of lung cancer. Nowadays, gemcitabine and cisplatin in combination have been adopted as the first-line chemotherapy for patients with NSCLC. This study aimed to monitor early response to combined chemotherapy of gemcitabine plus cisplatin in a mouse model of NSCLC by using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose and 18F-fluorothymidine small animal positron emission tomography (PET). Lewis lung carcinoma-bearing C57BL/6 mice were treated with gemcitabine-cisplatin or saline. Small animal PET with 18F-FDG and 18F-FLT was performed before (baseline) and after treatment (on Day 3), respectively. Imaging results were confirmed by histopathological studies (hematoxylin and eosin staining, Ki67 staining). Compared to the results in the control group, gemcitabine-cisplatin in the treated group significantly inhibited tumor growth (P<0.05). In the treated group, the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of 18F-FLT decreased significantly from 0.59±0.05 (baseline) to 0.28±0.05 (Day 3) (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between baseline (4.35±0.46) and that on Day 3 (4.02±0.47) on 18F-FDG SUVmax (P>0.05). The proliferation of tumor assessed by Ki67 staining decreased significantly after treatment of one dose of gemicitabine-cisplatin (P<0.05). The staining of HE showed an increase in necrotic and inflam- matory cells after the treatment. This study demonstrated that the uptake of 18F-FLT reduced more rapidly and signi-ficantly than that of 18F-FDG and was less disturbed by the increase of inflammatory cells after chemotherapy.
Objective To evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety of nedaplatin combined with gemcitabine compared with cisplatin combined with gemcitabine in the treatment of advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma. Methods The Cochrane Library, EMbase, PubMed, Web of Science, Wanfang, VIP, CNKI and China General Library of Biomedical Literature were searched. Literatures related to the efficacy and safety of nedaplatin combined with gemcitabine (nedaplatin group) versus cisplatin combined with gemcitabine (cisplatin group) in the treatment of advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma published from the inception to October 2021 were searched. The quality of included studies was assessed by Cochrane bias assessing tool and the meta-analysis was conducted by using RevMan 5.4. Results A total of 10 articles were included covering 914 patients. Meta-analysis showed that the objective remission rate (OR=1.51, 95%CI 1.13-2.01, P=0.005), disease control rate (OR=1.54, 95%CI 1.10-2.15, P=0.01) and 1-year survival rate (OR=2.29, 95%CI 1.25-4.18, P=0.007) of the nedaplatin group were better than those of the cisplatin group. In terms of side effects, the incidence of white blood cell and hemoglobin decline, nausea and vomiting, and diarrhea in the nedaplatin group was lower than that in the cisplatin group (P≤0.05). The differences in the platelet decline and liver and kidney damage between the two groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusion For patients with advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma, the short-term efficacy of nedaplatin combined with gemcitabine may be better than cisplatin combined with gemcitabine, and the incidence of adverse reactions is lower.