摘要:目的: 探讨传染病医院工作人员对甲型H1N1流感医院感染控制知识的认知程度。 方法 :选择救治甲型H1N1流感期间传染病医院不同岗位工作人员进行无记名自填式调查问卷。 结果 :全院对甲型H1N1流感医院感染控制认知总体情况良好,认知的薄弱环节是对防护措施,尤其是一级防护和三级防护的认知;不同工作岗位的工作人员对甲型H1N1流感医院感染控制认知程度不同,与甲型H1N1流感有接触的工作人员认知度高于其他工作人员,中高级职称、高年龄段(35岁以上)的医务人员认知度高于初级职称及低年龄段(35岁以下)的医务人员。 结论 :针对薄弱环节,进一步加强全员医院感染控制知识、技能的培训考核。Abstract: Objective: To explore the knowledge about the Influenza A (H1N1) of Chengdu Hospital for Infectious Diseases ‘s staff. Methods : Different medical staff of the infectious Disease Hospital during the influenza A (H1N1) treatment in Chinese mainland was selected to fill in anonymous questionnaire. Results : The awareness of the hospital is well about the hospital infection control to Influenza A (H1N1). Preventive measure is weak, especially about the primary barriers and the third barriers. The different position awareness is different. The staff who is in touch with Influenza A (H1N1) is more awareness than the others, the senior and intermediate title is more awareness than the Junior Title, the high ages group(over 35 ages) is more awareness than the low ages group (under 35 ages). Conclusion : For the weak link, further strengthens the entire hospital infection control knowledge, skills training and examination.
ObjectiveTo develop the questionnaire and test its reliability for investigating route, prevention, and control of SARS-CoV-2 infection in medical staffs.MethodsThis questionnaire was development based on the COVID-19 relevant guidelines, official documents issued by the National Health Committee of the People's Republic of China, and published studies. The development group performed repeated discussions and drafted the first questionnaire, then performed expert consultation and revised the draft according to their suggestions. Eventually, some frontline medical staffs were invited to carry out pre-test investigation of the questionnaire and test its reliability.ResultsThe first draft included 48 items; 18 experts were invited in the first round questionnaire and 10 experts in the second round questionnaire. The positive coefficient of experts in these two rounds was both greater than 75%, and the authority coefficient of experts' opinions was greater than 0.70. The variation coefficient of these items was between 0.00 and 0.35, the coordination coefficient of experts was 0.193 (P<0.05). The experts of above two rounds put forward 14 suggestions for text modification or adjustment options of some items; after the development group held repeatedly discussions, a total of 8 items were performed secondary consultation and finally reached consensus. The final questionnaire included two domains of questionnaire before and after confirmed diagnosis. The domain "before confirmed diagnosis" covered 4 sections and 29 items involving infectious cause, plan and knowledge of prevention and control, and psychological symptoms. The domain "after confirmed diagnosis" covered 5 sections and 21 items, included symptoms, treatment, and psychological status after diagnosis; impact on the surrounding environment and people, and awareness of protection after infection. The pre-test results showed that the total items were considerably numerous, some items were difficult to understand, some laboratory results and treatment conditions were ambiguous, etc. After modification and re-testing, the test-re-test reliability of each domain was between 0.74 and 0.93, and the overall re-test reliability of the questionnaire content was 0.82.ConclusionsThis research has developed a questionnaire for investigating infection process, prevention and control of SARS-CoV-2 infection in medical staff, and the items considered two domains prior to and after confirmed diagnosis. The reliability and practicability of the questionnaire are acceptable.
Since the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), health authorities at all levels have issued many prevention and control schemes, guidelines, and notices, and medical institutions have also formulated hospital-level COVID-19 prevention and control measures accordingly. However, the epidemic prevention and control work can only be done well when the prevention and control measures are effectively implemented. West China Hospital of Sichuan University has adopted the two-level (hospital-level and department-level) supervision. By clarifying the content and frequency of two-level supervision and adopting multiple forms of supervision, a complete supervision system covering the whole hospital has been formed. Through supervision, risk points in prevention and control were identified and continuous improvement was carried out to promote the implementation of prevention and control measures. This paper introduces the application of two-level supervision in COVID-19 prevention and control in West China Hospital of Sichuan University, providing a reference for peers.
Since the establishment in 2016, especially after the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic, the Hospital Infection Management Quality Control Center of Shuangliu District has carried out quality management and technical ability training for full-time and part-time infection prevention and control personnel through various methods, and used grid management to organize examinations and assessments, inspections and supervision, as well as consultation and assistance. As a result, the culture of infection prevention and control has been deeply rooted in the hearts of the people, the health administrative departments have increased investment in infrastructure and equipment, the funds for infection prevention and control have continued to increase, and the prevention and control quality of COVID-19 and daily works in the region has been continuously improved. The center plays a leading role in the promotion of the standardization, homogenization, and quality improvement of the prevention and control of hospital infection in the district.
Currently, there is a lack of guidelines and consensuses on hospital infection prevention and control for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) at home and aboard. Given that in-hospital infection control for CRRT differs from that for intermittent hemodialysis, the Nephrology Brunch of Sichuan International Medical Exchange & Promotion Association, in collaboration with West China Hospital of Sichuan University, has established an expert consensus group for CRRT hospital infection prevention and control. The group conducted systematic retrieval, data analysis, and expert consultation on the thematic content, and developed five topics: occupational protection for CRRT healthcare personnel, CRRT catheter-related infections, collection of CRRT blood/waste specimens, disinfection of CRRT machines, and utilization and disposal of CRRT consumables and waste. The aim is to standardize clinical practices, prevent nosocomial infections, and enhance awareness among healthcare personnel regarding infection prevention and control in CRRT settings.
Objective To study the effect of training methods for hospital infection management that through the whole process of diagnosis and treatment. Methods We selected part-time hospital infection personnel from Panyu Central Hospital of Guangzhou to form a teaching staff between January 1 and October 31, 2022. The teaching staff was randomly divided into a control group and an experimental group using a random number table method. The control group received training using traditional theoretical training models, while the experimental group received training using a simulated hospital infection training teaching model that runs through the entire diagnosis and treatment process. The training effects of the two groups through theoretical knowledge assessment, operational skills assessment, and teacher satisfaction evaluation were compared. Results A total of 196 teachers were included, with 98 students in each group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of gender, age, education level, major category, professional title, and years of work experience (P>0.05). The total score of theoretical knowledge examination in the experimental group [(88.49±8.33) vs. (80.35±13.57) points, t=5.062, P<0.001] was higher than the control group. Among them, the scores of hand hygiene standards for medical personnel, principles of aseptic operation, occupational exposure disposal, classification and disposal of medical waste were significantly higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). The total score of the operational skills assessment in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group [(86.37±5.25) vs. (76.75±7.07) points, t=10.811, P<0.001], among which the scores during operation, after operation, and overall impression were significantly higher than the control group (P<0.05). The overall satisfaction in the experimental group was higher than that of the control group (94.90% vs. 72.45%, χ2=18.076, P<0.001), among which the satisfaction with training methods, textbook value, course attractiveness, and clinical applicability were higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusions Through the whole process of diagnosis and treatment training method for hospital infection management can significantly improve the training effectiveness of teachers. It is worth promoting in the teaching of hospital infection management for various levels and types of personnel.