Objective To review the King-types Ⅲ and Ⅳ patients treated by the CD hybrid technique and evaluate clinical results on the shorter fusion levels. Methods Fifty-eight patients with idiopathic scoliosis were treated by the CD hybrid method from March 2000 to January 2003, among whom 40 were grouped as Kingtype Ⅲ and 18 as Kingtype Ⅳ; 41 were female and 17 were male. The Cobb angle of the thoracic curve was averaged 64°(range 50-83°), and the curve flexibility was 62%. The compensative lumbarcurve was averaged 37°（range 16-48°）, and the curve flexibility was 105%. With the neutral rotational vertebrae as a basis to select the low instrumentation vertebrae, the neutral rotational vertebrae or the vertebrae at 1 or 2 levelsproximal to the neutral rotational vertebrae were selected as the low instrumentation vertebrae in all the patients. Standing AP and lateral radiographs were taken respectively at the discharge, during the follow-up after discharge, and at the final follow-up. Results The patients were followed up for an average of 2.4 years (range 1.8-3.2). The corrected curves lost an average of 3.1°（range -1-5°）and the correction rate of the thoracic curve was 68% at the final follow-up.The plumbline from C7 was parallel to the sacral midline in 56 patients. The lumbar curves were corrected to an average of 8°（2-13°）automatically. The lumbosacral angle was corrected automatically by 53% and the low instrumentation vertebrae in 48 patients turned into stable vertebrae. The low instrumentation vertebrae lost 1.4 segments on average compared with the Harrington principle. No spinal imbalance was clinically observed in all the patients. Conclusion The choice of the low instrumentation vertebrae as the neutral rotational vertebrae can have a good result in the clinical practice. It can be applied in the CD hybrid technique in treatment of idiopathicthoracic curves.
Objective To compare the short and mid-term outcomes of open surgery and hybrid technique for the treatment of complex type B aortic dissection (AD). Methods A total of 45 patients (37 acute AD and 8 chronic AD) with complex type B AD were admitted to Nanjing First Hospital from January 2012 to June 2016, including 37 males and 8 females. All patients were confirmed by computed tomography angiography (CTA), and ultrasonic cardiogram (UCG) to rule out valvular diseases, aortic root and ascending aorta lesion, and pericardial effusion. According to different treatments, patients were divided into two groups: the open surgery group (OS group) with a total of 25 patients (20 males, 5 females, a mean age of 50.16±10.87 years); the hybrid technique group (HT group) with a total 20 patients (18 males, 2 females, mean age of 51.31±8.11 years). The short and mid-term outcomes of open surgery and hybrid technique for the treatment of complex type B AD were compared. Results All the patients were discharged successfully. There was no death, cognitive impairment, cerebral infarction, hemiplegia, paraplegia, coma and other neurological complications in both groups. In the OS group, one patient suffered acute kidney injury and received renal replacement therapy (RRT), whose renal function was returned to normal prior to discharge; one patient was transferred to ICU again owing to pericardial effusion, respiratory failure and lung infection; one patient underwent debridement surgery because of postoprative sternal dehiscence. In the HT group, one patient with recurrent chest pain five days after endovascular aortic repair, whose CTA showed hematoma of aortic arch and ascending aorta caused by reverse tear, underwent Sun’s procedure immediately. All patients received CTA examination three months after operation in outpatient room. In the OS Group, the tear of AD was closed well by stent-graft and no leakage or shunt was detected in CTA. The rate of thrombosis formation in thoracic aortic false lumen was 100.0%. Meanwhile, in the HT Group, there was one patient with type Ⅱ leakage and the rate of thrombosis formation in thoracic aortic false lumen was 94.7%. Conclusion For complex type B AD without optimal "landing zone" in descending aorta, open surgery is recommended as the first choice for experienced team because of its less costs and perfect results; hybrid technique which can achieve quicker recovery with less surgical trauma still has serious complications such as leakage, reverse tear, and so on.
The conventional total arch replacement (cTAR) with frozen elephant trunk implantation is commonly regarded as the gold standard for aortic pathologies involving ascending aorta and proximal aortic arch. By combining open supra-aortic vessels debranching and emerging endovascular technologies, hybrid arch repair (HAR) has been increasingly performed as a promising alternative in risky patients with comorbidities and frailties. Nevertheless, the advantages or disadvantages of hybrid arch procedures and cTAR in terms of survival and related outcomes remain controversial. This study is aimed to briefly review the role and results of HAR in the management of aortic arch pathology in comparison of contemporary cTAR.
ObjectiveTo report our clinical experience and outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for acute Stanford type A dissection using ascending aorta replacement combined with implantation of a fenestrated stent-graft of the entire aortic arch through a minimally invasive technique. MethodsFrom 2016 to 2020 in our hospital, 24 patients (17 males and 7 females, aged 45-72 years) with complicated Stanford type A aortic dissection, underwent replacement of the proximal ascending aorta with TEVAR. None of the patients with dissection involved the three branches of the superior arch, and all patients were replaced with artificial blood vessels of the ascending aorta under non-hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass, preserving the arch and the three branches above the arch, and individualized stent graft fenestration. ResultsSurgical technical success rate was 100.0%. There was no intraoperative complication or evidence of endo-leak in 1 month postoperatively. Hospital stay was 10±5 d. During postoperative follow-up, the stent was unobstructed without displacement, the preserved branch of the aortic arch was unobstructed, and the true lumen of the descending aorta was enlarged. Conclusion This hybrid technique by using TEVAR with fenestrated treatment is a minimally invasive and effective method to treat high-risk patients with acute Stanford type A aortic dissection.