ObjectiveTo summarize strategy of diagnosis and treatment of thrombotic iliac vein stenosis in recent years.MethodThe relevant literatures in recent 5 years on the current status and trend of diagnosis and treatment of the thrombotic iliac vein stenosis were reviewed.ResultsAt present, the diagnostic methods of thrombotic iliac vein stenosis mainly included that the multi-slice spiral CT, venography, intracavitary ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, color Doppler ultrasound and other imaging examinations, each of which had its advantages and disadvantages. There were still no uniform criteria whether a filter should be placed, whether the stents should and how to be placed, and when to intervene in the patients with acute thrombotic iliac vein stenosis. There was no definite conclusion when and how to effectively intervene in the patients with chronic thrombotic iliac vein stenosis.ConclusionsIncidence of thrombotic iliac vein stenosis is high and sequela is severe. Early diagnosis and reasonable treatment are very important. Only strictly grasping indications, combining medical technology and patient’s condition, and adopting appropriate treatment strategy, can make patients’ maximal benefit.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of intracavitary treatment for iliac vein compression syndrome（IVCS）with acute lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT).MethodsThe clinical data of 57 patients with IVCS and lower extremity DVT, who undergoing with stent implantation, balloon expansion and Angiojet rheolytic thrombectomy from June 2015 to June 2018, were retrospectively analyzed. The effect of treatment was evaluated by the changes of thigh circumference difference between the affected side and the healthy side, and the thrombosis clearance rate in the operating. In addition, the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) and stent patency rate were analyzed after long-term follow-up based on the change of Villaita scale score and ultrasound examination of lower extremity veins.ResultsThe success rate of surgical technique was 100%, and there was no pulmonary embolism during operating and postoperative. Lower extremity deep vein thrombosis clearance levels Ⅲ 48 cases (84.2%), Ⅱ 9 cases (15.8%), the changes of thigh circumference difference between the affected side and the healthy side from preoperative (5.8±1.7) cm to (3.7±1.0) cm. One year follow-up after operation, the primary patency rate of stent was 86.0% and PTS occurred in 8 patients (14.0%).ConclusionStent implantation, balloon expansion and Angiojet rheolytic thrombectomy for IVCS with acute lower extremity DVT is a safe, effective with low incidence of complications and efficient thrombus clearance.
ObjectiveTo investigate the research progress of diagnosis and treatment of iliac vein compression syndrome (IVCS) so as to find the optimal diagnosis and treatment method in clinic. MethodLiterature about etiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis and treatment of IVCS in recent years was reviewed. ResultsIVCS was one of the pelvic vein obstructive diseases. The compression of left common iliac vein by right common iliac artery was more common in clinic, and it could also cause partial or complete occlusion of the iliac vein due to other external pressures. Clinical manifestations mainly included venous pain, edema, varicose veins, venous ulcer, skin pigmentation, and other skin nutritional changes. The examination methods mainly included color Doppler ultrasound, computed tomography venography, magnetic resonance venography, intravascular ultrasound, and venography. The treatment method had been changed from the original open venous reconstruction to intravascular treatment. Endovascular treatment was included thrombolysis, thrombectomy, percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy, balloon angioplasty, and endovascular stent treatment or combination treatment according to whether they were combined with iliac-femoral venous thrombosis or not. ConclusionBased on the existing researches, intravascular ultrasound is the first choice to diagnose and guide the intravascular treatment, and iliac vein stenting is an effective method for the treatment of IVCS with a good long-term patency and obvious symptom improvement.
ObjectiveTo compare the improvement of clinical symptoms and patency of stents in patients with left and right non-thrombotic iliac vein compression syndrome (NIVCS) after endovascular stent therapy. MethodsThe clinical data of patients with NIVCS admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from January 2016 to January 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. The venous clinical severity score of the patients’ veins before therapy and on month 12 after therapy was analyzed. At the same time, the patencies of stents on month 1, 3, 6, and 12 after stenting were also analyzed. ResultsA total of 164 patients with NIVCS were collected, including 144 left NIVCS and 20 right NIVCS. The surgical technique success rate of endovascular stent therapy was 100% (164/164). There was no statistical difference of the venous clinical severity score between the patients with left and right NIVCS on month 12 after therapy (t=1.265, P=0.208), but the venous clinical severity score of left and right NIVCS patients on month 12 after therapy were lower than those before therapy (t=27.534, P<0.001; t=10.047, P<0.001). The accumulative one-stage stent patency rate on month 12 after therapy was 96.5% and 94.7% in the patients with left and right NIVCS, respectively (χ2=0.160, P=0.689). After the stent was fully supported and completely covered the extent of the lesion, the short-term (within 12 months) stent patency rates of the patients with different compression site of the iliac vein, as well as type, diameter, and length of stent placement had no statistical differences (P>0.05). ConclusionFrom the results of this study, whether left NIVCS or right NIVCS, endovascular stent therapy is safe and effective.
ObjectiveTo understand the prevalence of iliac vein stenosis in crowds without lower extremityvenous disease and symptoms (abbreviated as asymptomatic crowd) and patients with lower extremity varicose vein and analyze relevant to factors of iliac vein stenosis. MethodsAccording to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the CT imaging data and clinical informations of objects in the department of vascular surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from 2020 to 2021 were collected. The objects included the patients with lower extremity varicose vein in the department of vascular surgery of this hospital and asymptomatic crowds in the physical examination center of this hospital. The occurrence of iliac vein stenosis of the objects was compared and the relevant to risk factors affecting the occurrence of iliac vein stenosis were analyzed. ResultsA total of 268 subjects who met the criteria were included in this study, the iliac vein stenosis was occurred in 63 (23.5%) subjects. there were 162 asymptomatic crowds and 106 patients with lower extremity varicose vein. The incidence of iliac vein stenosis was higher in the patients with lower extremity varicose vein than that in the asymptomatic crowds [36.8% (39/106) versus 14.8% (24/162), χ2=17.212, P<0.001]. The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the female crowds had a higher risk of iliac vein stenosis as compared with the male crowds [OR=3.131, 95%CI (1.188, 8.257), P=0.021] and the crowds with higher body mass index (BMI) had a lower risk of iliac vein stenosis [OR=0.802, 95%CI (0.666, 0.966), P=0.020] in the asymptomatic crowds, as well as the risk of iliac vein stenosis was decreased in the older patients with lower extremity varicose vein [OR=0.946, 95%CI (0.901, 0.993), P=0.026]. ConclusionFrom the results of this study, the incidence of iliac vein stenosis is not low, and the incidence rate of patient with lower extremity varicose vein is higher than that of asymptomatic crowd, and there may be associated with gender, age, or BMI.
Venous occlusive diseases include acute deep vein thrombosis, as well as chronic iliac vein compression syndrome and post thrombotic syndrome. These diseases can lead to severe venous hypertension which greatly affect life quality. So domestic and international vascular society both have published several guidelines and consensus focusing on these diseases including the “Diagnosis and Treatment Standard about Common Venous Diseases 2022” by Vein Group of Vascular Surgery Committee from Chinese Medical Doctor Association, “2021 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Venous Thrombosis” and “2022 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Chronic Venous Disease of the Lower Limbs” by European Society of Vascular Surgery. Herein, we make a comparison and explanation of these guidelines and consensus to provide reference to the management of venous occlusive diseases.