Objective To evaluate the feasibility of immediate breast reconstruction with silicone prosthesis for breast tumor. Methods The clinical data of the 42 patients with breast tumor who had undergone breast reconstruction with silicone prosthesis from January 2012 to June 2017 were collected retrospectively. The postoperative complications and cosmetic results were analyzed. Results All patients underwent operation successfully. The surgical time was 230–435 min (mean of 325 min), the intraoperative blood loss was 100–160 mL (mean of 130 mL), and the hospitalization time was 18–33 d (mean of 24 d). The cosmetic results was excellent in 26 patients, good in 8 patients, bad in 8 patients, and fine rate was 81.0% (34/42). Rate of patients’ overall satisfaction with breast reconstruction was 73.8% (31/42) and rate of aesthetic satisfaction was 78.6% (33/42). After operation, seroma occurred in 2 patients, and the ischemic necrosis in nipple and areola occurred in 3 patients. All the patients were followed-up for 4–70 months, and the median follow-up time was 37 months. During the follow-up period, no patient had metastasis or recurrence. Six patients received radiotherapy, among them 2 patients appeared Ⅱ-grade capsular contracture. Conclusion The breast reconstruction with silicone prosthesis is a simple, easy, and effective surgical procedure.
Objective To evaluate the application effect of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in immediate breast reconstruction after mammary mastectomy with prosthetic implants. Methods The clinical data of 68 patients with breast cancer undergoing immediate breast reconstruction with prosthetic implantation in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed and divided into ADM group (n=43) and non-ADM group (n=25), according to the use of ADM in the posterior space of pectoralis major muscle while prosthesis implantation or not. The size of breast prosthesis, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, drainage duration, total drainage, total hospital stay, postoperative complications, postoperative cosmetic effect and quality of life of patients were compared between the two groups. Results Patients in the ADM group showed no statistically significant difference regarding operative time, drainage duration, total drainage, hospital stay, postoperative complications and intraoperative removed gland volume with the non-ADM group (P>0.05). The average intraoperative blood loss in the ADM group was less than that of the non-ADM group, the average volume of prosthesis in the ADM group was bigger than that of the non-ADM group, the volume difference between prosthesis and removed gland in the ADM group was smaller than that of the non-ADM group, which was considered statistically significant difference (P<0.05). The subjective satisfaction and objective measurement scores of patients in the ADM group were significantly better than those of the non-ADM group, especially in the symmetry of breast, surgical scar and distance of lateral displacement of nipple (P<0.05). The postoperative quality of life in the ADM group was significantly better than that of the non-ADM group in terms of body image, sexual function and sexual interest (P<0.01). Conclusions It is safe and feasible to use ADM-assisted the immediate breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mammary mastectomy with prosthetic implantation. As an extension of the pectoralis major muscle, ADM can enlarge the posterior space for the prosthesis implantation, making the choice of the prosthesis much more easier. The combined application of ADM can obtain a better cosmetic effect, meanwhile improving the postoperative quality of life and satisfaction of patients.
ObjectiveTo explore the surgical technique and preliminary safety and aesthetics results of immediate prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction (BR) with titanium-coated polypropylene mesh (TiLoop Bra) after skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) or nipple-areola-complex-sparing mastectomy (NSM) for breast cancer patients. MethodsThe clinical data of consecutive patients who underwent immediate prepectoral implant-based BR with TiLoop Bra after SSM or NSM in West China Hospital from January to July 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, early complication were collected. The preliminary aesthetics results were assessed with the Ueda score and Harris score. Results All the patients were female with a mean age of 39.0±6.8 years. One patient had bilateral breast malignant tumors, and the others had unilateral malignant tumors. Six patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery. The mean diameter of the tumors was 24.4±11.9 mm under the color ultrasound before the neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The mean operation time was 153.9±49.4 min. The mean intraoperative blood loss was 29.2±18.3 mL. There were 3 patients with tumor stage 0, 10 patients with stage Ⅰ, 6 patients with stage Ⅱ, 3 patients with stage Ⅲ and 1 patient was found no residual cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. All the patients were successfully followed up with a median follow-up time of 4.8 (3.0-9.2) months. There were 2 (8.3%) patients with major complications, including 1 wound dehiscence and 1 hematoma, and 4 (16.7%) minor complications, including 2 wound dehiscence and 2 infection. The patients with excellent and good Ueda score and Harris score accounted for 82.6% and 87.0%, respectively. None of the patients had animation deformity, capsular contracture, nipple-areola or skin flaps necrosis, or implant loss. During the follow-up period, no local/regional recurrence or distant metastasis was found. Conclusion For selected reliable patients, immediate prepectoral implant-based BR with TiLoop Bra after SSM or NSM for breast cancer patients is safe and has good aesthetics results in the early postoperative period. It has broad application space in patients with suitable indications, and can be promoted as a routine operation.