Objective To construct a quality evaluation index system for healthcare-associated infection (HAI) management, and conduct an empirical evaluation on the quality of HAI management in clinical departments. Methods The literature research method and panel discussion method were adopted to initially form the framework of HAI management quality evaluation index system, and the Delphi method and the analytic hierarchy process were used to establish the index system and determine the weights from January to December 2018. Eight comprehensive evaluation methods, such as osculating value method and technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution method, were used to evaluate the quality of HAI management in clinical departments of West China Hospital, Sichuan University in 2018. Kendall’s coefficient of concordance (W) was used to assess the consistency of the results. The clinical departments were ranked by the standardized total scores, which were the means of the normalized scores of the eight methods. Results A quality evaluation index system for HAI management with 3 first-level indicators and 15 second-level indicators was established finally. The results of the eight comprehensive evaluation methods for the quality evaluation of HAI management in 39 clinical departments of West China Hospital, Sichuan University were consistent (W=0.952, χ2=259.800, P<0.001). The standardized total score of Department 18 was 100, which ranked the first place. Conclusion The HAI management quality evaluation index system constructed in this study could be used in clinical departments to evaluate the quality of HAI management in combination with comprehensive evaluation methods.
ObjectiveTo construct an evaluation index system for the dissemination influence of new media health science popularization, providing a quantitative evaluation tool for comprehensively assessing the dissemination influence of health science communication works. MethodsMeta integration, Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) were used to build a preliminary evaluation index system, form a framework of the evaluation index system, and calculate the weight values of the evaluation indexes, respectively. ResultsA total of 18 studies were included through retrieval. On the basis of preliminary evaluation index system, ten experts in related professional fields were invited to participate in two rounds of expert consultation, resulting in an evaluation index system framework that includes 2 first-level indicators, 4 second-level indicators, and 9 third-level indicators. ConclusionA preliminary evaluation index system for the dissemination and influence of new media health science communication works, which is reliable, universally applicable, and has a reasonable structure, is constructed.