Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of aromatase inhibitors in ovulation induction for women with unexplained infertility. Methods The databases such as CNKI (1994 to June 2011), WanFang Data (1982 to June 2011), PubMed (1966 to June 2011) and The Cochrane Library (Issue 6, 2011) were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomized controlled trials (quasi-RCTs) for the comparison between aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and clomiphene citrate (CC). The quality of the retrieved trials was critically appraised and meta-analyses were conducted using RevMan 5.0.1 software. Results Nine studies were included; all of them were published in English. The results of meta-analyses showed there were no significant differences between AIs and CC in the pregnancy rate (RR=1.02, 95%CI 0.71 to 1.47), miscarriage rate (RR=1.00 95%CI 0.61 to 1.63), multiple pregnancy rate (RD= –0.02, 95%CI –0.07 to 0.03), and incidence rate of adverse events (RD=0.00, 95%CI –0.01 to 0.01); there were still no significant differences between the AIs+gonadotropin (Gn) group and the CC+Gn group in the pregnancy rate (RR=0.98, 95%CI 0.68 to 1.42), miscarriage rate (RR=1.23, 95%CI 0.70 to 2.15), multiple pregnancy rate (RD=0.00, 95%CI –0.10 to 0.10), and incidence rate of adverse events (RD=0.00, 95%CI –0.10 to 0.01). Conclusion Whether aromatase inhibitors can replace clomiphene citrate in ovulation induction for women with unexplained infertility is still an issue that has to be identified by performing well-designed large scale RCTs with longer follow-up duration.
Objectives To assess the effectiveness and safety of carnitine in the treatment of idiopathic asthenozoospermia. Methods The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMbase, and CNKI were searched between Jan 1995 and Dec 2006. Both English and Chinese studies were included in the review if they were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving men with idopathic asthenozoospermia who were treated with carnitine. Trial screening, data extraction, and quality assessment of included trials were conducted by method recommended by Cochrane Collaboration. Statistical analysis was conducted using RevMan 4.2.10 software. Results Five RCTs involving 346 patients met the inclusion criteria, and 307 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that: after being treated with carnitine for 3 and 6 months, the difference of the patients’ partners’ spontaneous pregnancy rate between treatment group and control group was statistically significant with RR2.46 and 95% CI1.12 to 5.43 (Z=2.23, P=0.03). After being treated with carnitine for 3 and 6 months, the difference of forward motile sperm per ejaculate between treatment group and control group was not statistically significant with WMD 9.16 and 95%CI 0.14 to 18.18 (Z=1.99, P=0.05) and WMD 5.28 and 95%CI –4.45 to 15.01 (Z=1.06, P=0.29). After being treated with carnitine for 3 and 6 months, the difference of percentage of forward sperm motility between treatment group and control group was not statistically significant with WMD 14.56 and 95%CI –4.49 to 33.61( Z=1.50 ,P=0.13), and WMD 7.34 and 95%CI –5.93 to 20.61 (Z=1.08, P=0.28). After being treated with carnitine for 3 and 6 months, the difference of total motile sperm per ejaculate between treatment group and control group was not statistically significant with WMD 15.32 and 95%CI –1.34 to 31.98 (Z=1.80, P=0.07) and WMD 6.20, 95%CI –3.00 to 15.39 (Z=1.32, P=0.19).After being treated with carnitine for 3 and 6 months, the difference of percentage of total sperm motility between treatment group and control group was not statistically significant with WMD 2.97 and 95%CI –5.75 to 11.69 (Z=0.67, P=0.50) and WMD 4.48 and 95%CI-9.17 to18.14 (Z=0.64, P=0.52). After being treated with carnitine for 3 and 6 months, the difference of semen volume between treatment group and control group was not statistically significant with WMD –0.12 and 95%CI –0.55 to 0.30 (Z=0.57, P=0.57) and WMD 0.03 and 95%CI –0.38 to 0.45 (Z=0.16, P=0.87). After being treated with carnitine for 3 and 6 months, the difference of sperm concentration between treatment group and control group was not statistically significant with WMD 7.92 and 95%CI – 2.85 to18.68 (Z=1.44, P=0.15), and WMD 1.02 and 95%CI –5.09 to 7.14 (Z=0.33, P=0.74). Three RCTs reported that there were no serious side effects of carnitine during the treatment period. Conclusions The available evidence indicates that spontaneous pregnancy rate would increase with carnitine therapy, while it is short of improvement of semen parameters. There is no serious side effect of carnitine. Because of lack of evidence, we cannot conclude that carnitine is effective in improving the prognosis of infertile patients with idiopathic asthenozoospermia. More high quality trials with large sample are proposed.
①供体授精:我们发现,在供体授精的效果方面,尚缺乏高质量证据.②胞浆内精子注射+体外授精:1篇系统评价发现,尚无足够的证据说明胞浆内精子注射+体外授精与单独使用体外授精何者效果更好.③宫腔内人工授精:两篇系统评价发现,宫腔内人工授精较宫颈内授精或自然性交,能明显增加每个周期的妊娠率.④体外授精与配子输卵管内移植:1个RCT显示,尚无足够证据证明体外授精与配子输卵管内移植何者效果更好.
Objective To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of letrozole combined with metformin in the treatment of polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) infertility. Methods PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chongqing VIP, Wanfang, and SinoMed were searched from establishment to December 31, 2022. The literature on randomized controlled trials of letrozole combined with metformin in the treatment of PCOS infertility were included. RevMan 5.4 software was used for meta-analysis. Results A total of 29 articles including 3226 subjects were included, with trial group of 1614 treated with letrozole combined with metformin, and control group of 1612 treated with letrozole alone. The meta-analysis results showed that the clinical pregnancy rate [relative risk (RR)=1.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.61, 1.92)], induced ovulation rate [RR=1.22, 95%CI (1.17, 1.28)], and number of dominant follicles [mean difference (MD)=1.15, 95%CI (0.86, 1.43)] in the trial group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). The follicle growth time [MD=−5.41 d, 95%CI (−6.03, −4.80) d], estradiol level [MD=−7.57 pmol/L, 95%CI (−10.59, −4.56) pmol/L], luteinizing hormone level [MD=−2.27 U/L, 95%CI (−2.59, −1.95) U/L], testosterone level [MD=−1.29 nmol/L, 95%CI (−1.74, −0.85) nmol/L], fasting blood glucose level [MD=−0.91 mmol/L, 95%CI (−1.71, −0.65) mmol/L], fasting insulin level [MD=−25.93 pmol/L, 95%CI (−29.06, −22.80) pmol/L], insulin resistance index [MD=−1.40, 95%CI (−1.61, −1.19)], and the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome [RR=0.44, 95%CI (0.22, 0.88)] in the trial group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in follicle stimulating hormone level, incidence of adverse reactions, and spontaneous abortion rates between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Existing evidence suggests that compared to using trazole alone, the combination of letrozole and metformin can improve ovulation induction and pregnancy outcomes in patients with PCOS infertility. The combination of the two drugs can reduce levels of estradiol, testosterone, and luteinizing hormone in patients, while effectively reducing the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.