west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "kinesiophobia" 3 results
  • Relationship between postoperative kinesiophobia and functional recovery in patients with lumbar disc herniation

    Objective To explore the correlation between postoperative kinesiophobia and rehabilitation outcome in patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Methods This study was a cross-sectional survey. The patients who underwent lumbar discectomy due to LDH in West China Hospital of Sichuan University between June and October 2019 were included consecutively. According to the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) score, patients were divided into two groups: the kinesiophobia group and the non-kinesiophobia group. The patients’ scores of the TSK, the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scores (JOA) at different time points were collected. The relationship between postoperative kinesiophobia, pain, and lumbar function in patients was analyzed. Results A total of 201 patients were included. Among them, there were 128 cases in the kinesiophobia group and 73 cases in the non-kinesiophobia group. The incidence of kinesiophobia was 63.68%. Pearson correlation test analysis showed that TSK score was positively correlated with VAS score (r=0.218, P<0.01) and ODI score (r=0.263, P<0.01) at 24 h after surgery. At one month after surgery, there was a positive correlation with VAS score (r=0.296, P<0.01) and a negative correlation with JOA score (r=−0.182, P<0.05). The results of multiple linear regression showed that postoperative age, pain, lumbar function, and postoperative kinesiophobia were interrelated (P<0.05). Conclusions Patients with LDH had a higher incidence of kinesiophobia 24 h after surgery. Postoperative kinesiophobia was correlated with the recovery outcome of patients with LDH.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Best evidence summary for prevention and management of kinesiophobia in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty

    Objective To systematically search for evidence related to the prevention and management of kinesiophobia in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty at home and abroad, evaluate and integrate the evidence, and to provide reference for clinical nursing practice. Methods Domestic and international evidence-based resource databases, including UpToDate, BMJ (British Medical Journal) Best Practice, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines network, JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute) evidence-based healthcare center database, Cochrane Library, Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario website, China guidelines network, Web of Science, PubMed, SinoMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang were searched. Evidence related to the prevention and management of kinesiophobia after total knee arthroplasty was collected, and the search period was until June 30, 2023. The evidence extraction and integration were conducted on the literature that meets the requirements. Results A total of 10 papers were ultimately included, including 1 guideline, 1 expert consensus, 2 systematic evaluations, 4 randomized controlled studies, and 2 cohort studies. A total of 17 pieces of evidence were extracted from 5 aspects, including risk assessment, health education, intraoperative pain management, rehabilitation exercise, and patient participation. Conclusion The prevention and management of kinesiphobia after total knee arthroplasty include evidence from multiple aspects, which can provide evidence-based basis for orthopedic and rehabilitation medical staff to develop intervention plans for kinesiphobia and promote rapid recovery of patients with total knee arthroplasty.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Potential categories and influencing factors of kinesiophobia trajectories in patients after total hip arthroplasty

    Objective To investigate the development trajectories of kinesiophobia and their influencing factors in patients after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods Patients after THA from three tertiary hospitals in Wuhan from February to June 2023 were selected by convenience sampling method. The general situation questionnaire, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale (SEE), Groningen Orthopaedic Social Support Scale, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Patient Health Questionnaire, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were distributed 1-2 d after surgery (T1), which were used again 1 week (T2), 1 month (T3), and 3 months (T4) after surgery, to evaluate the level of kinesiophobia and the physical and psychological conditions of the patients. The latent category growth model was used to classify the kinesiophobia trajectories of patients after THA, and the influencing factors of different categories of kinesiophobia trajectories were analyzed. Results A total of 263 patients after THA were included. The kinesiophobia trajectories of patients after THA were divided into four potential categories, including 29 cases in the C1 high kinesiophobia persistent group, 41 cases in the C2 medium kinesiophobia improvement group, 131 cases in the C3 low kinesiophobia improvement group, and 62 cases in the C4 no kinesiophobia group. Multicategorical logistic regression analysis showed that compared to the C4 no kinesiophobia group, the influencing factors for the kinesiophobia trajectory in THA patients to develop into the C1 high kinesiophobia persistent group were age [odds ratio (OR)=1.081, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.025, 1.140)], chronic comorbidities [OR=6.471, 95%CI (1.831, 22.872)], the average SEE score at T1-T4 time points [OR=0.867, 95%CI (0.808, 0.931)], and the average VAS score at T1-T4 time points [OR=7.981, 95%CI (1.718, 37.074)], the influencing factors for the kinesiophobia trajectory to develop into the C2 medium kinesiophobia improvement group were age [OR=1.049, 95%CI (1.010, 1.089)], education level [OR=0.244, 95%CI (0.085, 0.703)], and the average VAS score at T1-T4 time points [OR=8.357, 95%CI (2.300, 30.368)], and the influencing factors for the kinesiophobia trajectory to develop into the C3 low kinesiophobia improvement group were the average SEE score [OR=0.871, 95%CI (0.825, 0.920)] and the average VAS score at T1-T4 time points [OR=4.167, 95%CI (1.544, 11.245)] . Conclusion Kinesiophobia in patients after THA presents different trajectories, and nurses should pay attention to the assessment and intervention of kinesiophobia in patients with advanced age, low education level, chronic diseases, low exercise self-efficacy, and high pain level.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content