Objective To investigate the effect of anteromedial coronoid facet fracture and lateral collateral ligament complex (LCLC) injury on the posteromedial rotational stability of the elbow joint. Methods The double elbows were obtained from 4 fresh adult male cadaveric specimens. Complete elbow joint (group A,n=8), simple LCLC injury (group B,n=4), simple anteromedial coronoid facet fracture (group C,n=4), and LCLC injury combined with anteromedial coronoid facet fracture (group D,n=8). The torque value was calculated according to the load-displacement curve. Results There was no complete dislocation of the elbow during the experiment. The torque values of groups A, B, C, and D were (10.286±0.166), (5.775±0.124), (6.566±0.139), and (3.004±0.063) N·m respectively, showing significant differences between groups (P<0.05). Conclusion Simple LCLC injury, simple anteromedial coronoid facet fracture, and combined both injury will affect the posteromedial rotational stability of the elbow.
Objective To make further exploration of the structure characteristics of anterolateral ligament (ALL) and provide clinical reference for diagnosis and treatment of ALL injury, especially for ALL reconstruction through anatomical study of ALL in a Chinese population. Methods Sixteen cadaveric knees, including 8 left knees and 8 right knees with sex ratio of 1∶1 and a mean age of 73.5 years (range, 57-84 years), were dissected to reveal the ALL through a standard approach. A qualitative and a quantitative characterizations of the ALL were performed. Results ALL was seen in 75.0% of the specimens, originating on the lateral femoral epicondyle, proximal and posterior to the lateral collateral ligament (LCL). It coursed on LCL or was parallel to LCL, anterodistally to its anterolateral tibial attachment approximately midway between the center of the Gerdy’s tubercle and the lateral margin of the fibular head. A strong connection was observed between the middle part of the ALL and the periphery of the meniscal body of the lateral meniscus. The distance between the center of the insertion and Gerdy’s tubercle was (23.9±3.3) mm; and the distance between the center of the insertion and the lateral margin of the fibular head was (23.8±4.0) mm. The ALL length at 0° and 60° flexion and neutral knee rotation were (44.8±5.1) mm and (47.8±5.5) mm respectively (t=14.071, P=0.000), and the ligament had its great extend at 60° of knee flexion and internal rotation. Furthermore, the ALL length at 0° and 60° flexion of males were both significantly higher than those of females (t=2.920, P=0.015; t=2.806, P=0.019), while other measurements differences were significant between males and females (P>0.05). Conclusion ALL is an independent and a non-isometric ligament located in the anterolateral area to the knee, of which the length is different between males and females. ALL plays a role in rotational stability of the knee, and should be put much emphasis in clinical practice.
Objective To summarize the research progress in posteromedial rotatory instability (PMRI) of the elbow joint. Methods The recent researches about the management of PMRI of the elbow joint from the aspects of pathological anatomy, biomechanics, diagnosis, and therapy were analyzed and summarized. Results The most important factors related to PMRI of the elbow joint are lateral collateral ligament complex (LCLC) lesion, posterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament complex (MCLC) lesion, and anteromedial coronoid fracture. Clinical physical examination include varus and valgus stress test of the elbow joint. X-ray examination, computed tomography, particularly three-dimensional reconstruction, are particularly useful to diagnose the fracture. Also MRI, arthroscopy, and dynamic ultrasound can assistantly evaluate the affiliated injury of the parenchyma. It is important to repair and reconstruct LCLC and MCLC and fix coronoid process fracture for recovering stability of the elbow joint. There are such ways to repair ligament injury as in situ repairation and functional reconstruction, which include direct suturation, borehole repairation, wire anchor repairation, and transplantation repairation etc. The methods for fixation of coronal fracture include screw fixation, plate fixation, unabsorbable suture fixation, and arthroscopy technology. Conclusion It is crucial that recovering the stability of the elbow joint and early functional exercise for the treatment of PMRI. Individual treatment is favorable to protect soft tissue, reduce surgical complications, and improve the functional recovery and the quality of life.
ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of transosseous tunnel fixation and drilling fixation for repair of lateral collateral ligament complex (LCLC) in treatment of terrible triad of elbow (TTE).MethodsA clinical data of 50 patients with TTE between June 2012 and January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The LCLC was repaired with transosseous tunnel fixation in 22 patients (transosseous tunnel fixation group) and with drilling fixation in 28 patients (drilling fixation group). There was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05) in gender, age, fracture side, time from injury to admission, coronoid process fracture classification, radial head fracture classification, and TTE classification. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing time, and complications of the two groups were recorded. At last follow-up, the Mayo elbow performance system (MEPS) score, range of motion of elbow joint, and Broberg-Morrey classification were recorded.ResultsThe operation of two groups were successfully completed. There was no significant difference in the operation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two group (P>0.05). The follow-up time was (24.43±6.84) months in the transosseous tunnel fixation group and (21.55±6.16) months in the drilling fixation group, and the difference was not significant (t=1.534, P=0.132). X-ray films showed that the coronoid process and radial head fractures in the two groups healed, and there was no significant difference in the healing time (P>0.05). At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in the flexion-extension activity, rotation activity, MEPS score, and Broberg-Morrey grading (P>0.05). During the follow-up, there was no re-dislocation or instability of the elbow joint. The incidence of complication was 28.57% (8/28) in the transosseous tunnel fixation group and 27.27% (6/22) in the drilling fixation group, showing no significant difference (χ2=2.403, P=0.121).ConclusionBoth transosseous tunnel fixation and drilling fixation can achieve good results in repair of LCLC for TTE.
Objective To investigate the surgical technique and effectiveness of anatomical posterolateral complex (PLC) reconstruction in treating severe posterolateral knee instability using Y-shaped allogeneic Achilles tendon. Methods The clinical data of 12 patients with Fanelli type C chronic PLC injury with severe posterolateral knee instability who met the selection criteria between June 2013 and August 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 9 males and 3 females, with a median age of 34.5 years (range, 18-57 years). The average time from injury to surgery was 10.5 months (range, 3-24 months). All of them were multi-ligament injuries and were treated with anatomical reconstruction of Y-shaped allogeneic Achilles tendon. The posterior and varus stress X-ray films were used to measure and calculate the difference of posterior displacement of tibia and difference of lateral joint opening distance between bilateral knees to evaluate the backward stability of LCL and knee joint; the knee flexion 30° tibial external rotation test was used to calculate the difference of tibial external rotation angle between bilateral knees to evaluate the stability of knee external rotation. The knee function was evaluated by the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) 2000 subjective and objective scores. ResultsThe operation successfully completed in 12 patients, and there was no vascular and nerve injury during operation. The operation time was 2.5-3.5 hours, with an average of 2.7 hours; the intraoperative blood loss was 20-100 mL, with an average of 55 mL. All patients were followed up 13-41 months, with an average of 28.1 months. At last follow-up, the difference of posterior displacement of tibia, the difference of lateral joint opening, the difference of tibial external rotation angle between bilateral knees, and the IKDC2000 subjective score, the objective scores of tibial external rotation and knee varus significantly improved when compared with those before operation (P<0.05). The knee joint of 1 patient with anterior cruciate ligament, posterior cruciate ligament, and PLC reconstruction was stiff at 15 months after operation, and the range of motion of the knee joint was 10°-80°. After arthroscopic release, the range of motion of the knee joint was 5°-120°, the reconstructed ligament was stable. In the other patients, the knee flexion angle was normal in 2 cases; 9 cases had knee flexion limitation of 5°-10°, with an average of 6.4°; no knee extension was limited. ConclusionAnatomical PLC reconstruction using Y-shaped allogeneic Achilles tendon can effectively treat Fanelli type C chronic PLC injury with severe posterolateral knee instability and improve the knee joint stability.