west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "lumbar spinal tuberculosis" 2 results
  • Treatment of thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis by posterior focus debridement and bone grafting and fixation combined with psoas abscess debridement and local chemotherapy via different approachs

    ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of posterior and anterior psoas abscess debridement and local chemotherapy in abscess cavity combined with focus debridement, bone grafting, and fixation via posterior approach in treatment of thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis, and explore the feasibility of psoas abscess debridement via posterior approach.MethodsBetween June 2012 and December 2015, the clinical data of 37 patients with thoracolumbar spine tuberculosis and psoas abscess were retrospectively analyzed. All the patients underwent posterior focus debridement, bone grafting, and internal fixation, and were divided into two groups according to different approaches to psoas abscess debridement. Twenty-one patients in group A underwent abscess debridement and local chemotherapy in abscess cavity via posterior approach; 16 patients in group B underwent abscess debridement and local chemotherapy in abscess cavity via anterior approach. No significant difference was found between two groups in gender, age, disease duration, involved segments, preoperative erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), preoperative C-reactive protein (CRP), side of psoas abscess, maximum transverse diameter and sagittal diameter of psoas abscess, accompanying abscess, abscess cavity separation, preoperative Cobb angle of involved segments, preoperative American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) classification (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization time, time of abscess absorption and bone fusion were recorded and compared between 2 groups. The change of pre- and post-operative involved segments Cobb angle was observed. Neurological function was assessed according to ASIA classification.ResultsExcept that the operation time of group B was significantly longer than that of group A (t=–2.985, P=0.005), there was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization time, time of abscess absorption and bone fusion between 2 groups (P>0.05). All patients were followed up 18-47 months (mean, 31.1 months). No cerebrospinal fluid leakage occurred intra- and post-operation. Four patients in group A underwent second-stage operation of abscess debridement and local chemotherapy in abscess cavity via anterior approach. All patients got abscess absorption, meanwhile ESR and CRP level normalized at last follow-up. The involved segments Cobb angle improved significantly when compared with preoperative values in both 2 groups (P<0.05); and there was no significant difference between 2 groups at last follow-up (P>0.05). Nine patients with spinal cord injury had significant neurological recovery at last follow-up (Z=–2.716, P=0.007).ConclusionPosterior focus debridement, bone grafting, and internal fixation combined with abscess debridement and local chemotherapy in abscess cavity is effective in treatment of thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis, but in some cases anterior abscess debridement is still required.

    Release date:2018-07-12 06:19 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Comparison of nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 bioactive support and autologous iliac bone in bone grafting and fusion for elderly patients with lumbar tuberculosis

    Objective To investigate the safety of nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 (n-HA/PA66) bioactive support in bone grafting and fusion for elderly patients with lumbar tuberculosis, and to analyze its effectiveness and advantages by comparing with autologous iliac bone grafting. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 48 elderly patients with lumbar tuberculosis who met the selection criteria between January 2017 and January 2020. The patients all underwent one-stage posterior pedicle screw internal fixation combined with anterior lesion removal and bone grafting and fusion, of which 23 cases applied n-HA/PA66 bioactive support+allogeneic bone graft (n-HA/PA66 group) and 25 cases applied autologous iliac bone graft (autologous iliac bone group). There was no significant difference between the two groups in gender, age, bone density, disease duration, lesion segment, and preoperative pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and Cobb angle (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications, as well as the VAS score, JOA score, American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) spinal cord injury grading, Cobb angle, and bone fusion were recorded and compared between the two groups. Results The operations were completed successfully in both groups. n-HA/PA66 group had significantly less operation time and intraoperative blood loss than the autologous iliac bone group (P<0.05). All patients were followed up 12-24 months, with an average of 15.7 months. And the difference in follow-up time between the two groups was not significant (P>0.05). Postoperative complications occurred in 3 cases (13%) in the n-HA/PA66 group and 10 cases (40%) in the autologous iliac group, and the difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups was significant (χ2=4.408, P=0.036). The postoperative VAS scores and JOA scores significantly improved when compared with the preoperative scores in both groups (P<0.05), and the difference was significant (P<0.05) between 2 weeks after operation and the last follow-up. The difference in VAS score at 2 weeks after operation was significant between the two groups (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference (P>0.05) at the other time points. At last follow-up, according to the ASIA grading, the effective improvement rate was 86% (18/21) in the n-HA/PA66 group and 90% (18/20) in the autologous iliac group, with no significant difference (χ2=0.176, P=0.675). Imaging review showed that grade Ⅰ bony fusion was obtained in both groups, and the fusion time of bone graft in the n-HA/PA66 group was significantly longer than that in the autologous iliac bone group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the Cobb angle at each time point between the two groups (P>0.05). No recurrence of tuberculosis, loosening or fracture of the internal fixator, or displacement of the bone graft was observed during follow-up. Conclusion In elderly patients with lumbar spine tuberculosis, the n-HA/PA66 bioactive support combined with allogeneic bone graft can effectively restore and maintain the fusion segment height and physiological curvature of the lumbar spine, and the fusion rate of bone graft is similar to that of autologous iliac bone, which can achieve better effectiveness.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content