Objective To evaluate the surgical technique and effectiveness of arthroscopic treatment for lateral discoid meniscus injury. Methods Between January 2010 and May 2011, 38 patients (42 knees) with lateral discoid meniscus injuries underwent arthroscopic treatment. There were 23 males (24 knees) and 15 females (18 knees), aged 7-62 years (median, 32.8 years). The disease duration was 7 days to 40 years (median, 8.6 months). According to Watanabe’s classification of discoid meniscus, 22 knees were classified as complete type, 19 knees as incomplete type, and 1 knee as Wrisberg type. Meniscus plasty combined with suture was performed in 25 patients (28 knees), partial meniscectomy in 12 patients (13 knees), and complete meniscectomy in 1 patient (1 knee). After operation, the rehabilitation training programs (including straight-leg-raising exercise and range of motion exercise) were carried out. Results All incisions healed primarily. The patients basically had normal activities after 3-4 weeks. All the patient were followed up 12-18 months (mean, 14.3 months). No joint locked or clicking symptom occurred; no tear or revision was noted during follow-up. At 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after operation, the range of flexion and extension were significantly improved when compared with ones at preoperation (P lt; 0.05). Based on Ikeuchi’s grading, the results were excellent in 22 knees, good in 16 knees, and fair in 4 knees with an excellent and good rate of 90.4%. The Lysholm score was significantly increased to 88.57 ± 2.95 at immediate, 91.02 ± 4.17 at 3 months, 92.90 ± 3.36 at 6 months, and 94.74 ± 3.52 at 12 months after operation from 69.38 ± 4.59 before operation (P lt; 0.05). C onclusion Treatment of lateral discoid meniscus injury under arthroscopy has the advantages of minor trauma, precise resection or repair meniscus, preservation of more meniscus function, and low incidence of osteoarthritis. If the operation is combined with standard rehabilitation training, the short-term effectiveness can be enhanced.
【Abstract】 Objective To compare the short-term effects of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy in treating medial versuslateral meniscus injuries. Methods From January 2003 to January 2006, 207 patients with meniscus injury(without intraarticularligament injury) underwent arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. The medial meniscus injury group included 115 cases, 50males and 65 females; aged 14 to 78 years(mean 46.9 years); 66 left knees and 49 right knees. Twenty-six cases had injury histories,the delayed time from injury to surgery ranged from 6 d to 6 months (mean 2.1 months). The lateral meniscus injury group included92 cases, 18 males and 74 females; aged 16 to 62 years (mean 41.1 years); 57 left knees and 35 right knees. Twenty-four caseshad injury histories, the delayed time from injury to surgery ranged from 9 d to 6 months (mean 1.9 months). Lysholm score systemwas applied and the scors of pre- and post-operation and were compared between two groups. Results The period of followupranged from 12 to 45 months (mean 31.5 months). In medial meniscus injury group and lateral meniscus injury roup, theLysholm score increased from 61.3±16.9 and 57.4±17.6 preoperation to 95.0±7.9 and 93.3±7.4 postoperation respectively. Therewas statistically significant difference between preoperation and postoperation (P lt; 0.01), and there was no statistically significantdifference between two groups（P gt; 0.05）. The excellent and good rates for function of knee joint were 97.39% (excellent in 107cases, good in 5 cases and fair in 3 cases) in medial meniscus injury group and 100%(excellent in 80 cases and good in 12 cases)in lateral meniscus injury group. Conclusion Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy is a safe and effective treatment for meniscusinjury, there is no diference in short-term effects in treating medial versus lateral meniscus injuries.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of arthroscopic bipolar radiofrequency energy (bRFE) and lateral partial meniscectomy for lateral meniscus tear and cartilage lesion. MethodsBetween January 2011 and December 2012, 40 eligible patients with lateral meniscus tear and cartilage injury in the lateral knee compartment underwent arthroscopic treatment, and the clinical data were analysed retrospectively. There were 21 males and 19 females, aged 15-65 years (mean, 42.1 years). The left knee was involved in 22 cases and the right knee in 18 cases. The causes of injury included sport injuries in 5 cases and sprain of knee joints in 8 cases, the remaining patients had no history of trauma. The disease duration ranged from 1 month to 10 years (median, 10 months). The Lysholm score and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score of the knee were 59.9±8.2 and 69.6±5.3. According to the Outerbridge classification, 2 cases were rated as grade I, 21 cases as grade II, 17 cases as grade III, and 10 cases as grade IV. The scores described by Noyes were 1-16 (mean, 6.52). The Noyes scores were from 1 to 6 points in 20 patients (group A) and 7 to 16 points in 20 patients (group B). During surgery, all patients underwent partial meniscectomy, and radiofrequency-based chondroplasty was used. Knee joint function was assessed using the Lysholm score and JOA score of the knee, and the clinical outcomes between different degrees of cartilage lesions were also compared. ResultsAll incisions healed primarily without complication. All the patients were followed up 8-31 months (mean, 18.1 months). The Lysholm and JOA scores of the knee at last follow-up (92.2±7.2 and 92.9±7.9, respectively) were significantly higher than those at preoperation (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in preoperative Lysholm and JOA scores of the knee between groups A and B (P>0.05), but significance difference was found between 2 groups at last follow-up (P<0.05). ConclusionArthroscopic bRFE and lateral partial meniscectomy have good effectiveness in treating lateral meniscus tear and cartilage lesion. The effectiveness is better in patients with mild cartilage lesion than in patients with severe cartilage lesion.
Objective To review the research progress of meniscus repair in recent years, in order to provide help for the clinical decision-making of meniscus injury treatment. Methods The domestic and foreign literature related to meniscal repair in recent years was extensively reviewed to summarize the reasons for the prevalence of meniscal repair, surgical indications, various repair methods and long-term effectiveness, the need to deal with mechanical structural abnormalities, biological enhancement repair technology, rehabilitation treatment, and so on. Results In order to delay the occurrence of osteoarthritis, the best treatment of meniscus has undergone an important change from partial meniscectomy to meniscal repair, and the indications for meniscal repair have been expanding. The mid- and long-term effectiveness of different meniscal repair methods are ideal. During meniscus repair, the abnormality of lower limb force line and meniscus protrusion should be corrected at the same time. There are controversies about the biological enhancement technology to promote meniscus healing and rehabilitation programs, which need further study. ConclusionMeniscal repair can restore the normal mechanical conduction of lower limbs and reduce the incidence of traumatic osteoarthritis, but the poor blood supply and healing ability of meniscal tissue bring difficulties to meniscal repair. Further development of new biological enhanced repair technology and individualized rehabilitation program and verification of its effectiveness will be an important research direction.