Objective To evaluate the outcomes and summarize the clinical experience of totally endoscopic mitral valve repair with artificial chordae implantation. Methods From May 2013 to June 2016, 71 patients with mitral valve insufficiency were admitted to our hospital who underwent totally endoscopic mitral valve repair with artificial chordae implantation. There were 47 males and 24 females with the age of 46.0±14.4 years ranging from 13-78 years. The pathogenesis included degenerative valvular diseases in 63 patients, congenital valvular diseases in 4, infectious endocarditis in 2, rheumatic disease in 1 and cardiomyopathy in 1. Prolapse of anterior, posterior, or both leaflets was present in 26 (36.6%), 19 (26.8%), and 25 (35.2%) patients, respectively; one patient (1.4%) presented valve annulus enlargement and thirteen were associated with commissure lesion. The mitral regurgitation area ranged from 4.2 to 26.3 cm2 (mean, 12.2±5.6 cm2). All the procedures were performed by total endoscopy under cardiac arrest. 5-0 Gore-tex sutures were used as the material of artificial chordae which was implanted one by one. Results There was no in-hospital death. One patient was transferred to mitral valve replacement, and one median sternotomy due to bleeding. The mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 156.0±31.6 min and aortic cross-clamp time 110.0±20.1 min. We finally had 39 isolated mitral valve repair, 28 mitral valve repair combined tricuspid valve repair, 3 mitral valve repair combined atrial septal defect closure, and 1 mitral valve repair combined correction of partial anomalous pulmonary vein connection. Each patient was implanted artificial chordae of 2.5±1.7 (ranging from 1 to 7), and 65 patients received mitral annulus (full ring). The intraoperative transoesophageal echocardiography found no mitral regurgitation in 44 patients, the area of mitral regurgitation was 0-2 cm2 in 24, and 3 patients with mitral regurgitation>2 cm2 experienced serious systolic anterior motion. Of the 3 patients with systolic anterior motion (SAM), one transferred to mitral valve replacement, one underwent mitral re-repair, and one took conservative treatment. The mean follow-up was 12.7±10.5 months (range: 1 to 36 months), while 2 patients were lost to follow up with the follow-up rate of 97.2%. Recurrent severe regurgitation occured in 3 patients, moderate in 5, mild or trivial in 27 and no regurgitation in 36. During the follow-up, 1 patient died of myocardiopathy-induced heart failure post discharge, 1 suffered from cerebral infarction, and no patient underwent reoperation. Conclusion The totally endoscopic surgical treatment of mitral valvuloplasty with artificial chordae is reliable for patients with mitral valve prolapse, which provides favorable clinical efficacy and outcomes. The difficulty lies in how to determine the appropriate length of the chordae and keep the stability of length.
Objective To compare long-term outcomes following mitral valvuloplasty (MVP) and mitral valve replacement (MVR) for native valve endocarditis (NVE). Methods Between November 1993 and August 2016, consecutive 101 patients with NVE underwent mitral surgery in our department, MVP for 52 patients and MVR for 49 patients. There were 69 males and 32 females at age of 38.1±14.9 years. The mean follow-up was 99.4±75.8 months. Results There was no statistical difference in cardiopulmonary bypass time, aortic cross-clamp time, in-hospital mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU stay or hospital stay after surgery between the two groups. Survival rate at 1, 5, 10, 20 years after surgery was 100.0%, 97.6%, 97.6%, 97.6% for MVP, and 93.5%, 84.3%, 84.3%, 66.2% for MVR with a statistical difference between the two groups (P=0.018). There was no stroke in the patients with MVP during follow-up periods. However, stroke-free survival rate at 1, 5, 10, 20 years after surgery was 100.0%, 93.9%, 89.4%, 70.2% for MVR patients with a statistical difference between the two groups (P=0.023). There was no statistical difference in recurrence of infection, perivalvular leakage and reoperation between the two groups. Composite endpoint-free survival rate at 1, 5, 10, 20 years after surgery was 100.0%, 97.6%, 92.9%, 92.9% for MVP, and 91.3%, 79.6%, 75.8%, 51.0% for MVR with a statistical difference (P=0.006). Conclusion MVP is associated with better outcomes than MVR in the patients with NVE; generalizing MVP technique in the patients with NVE is needed.
ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of mitral valvuloplasty via minimally invasive approach with those of mitral valvuloplasty via traditional median sternotomy.MethodsA total of 1 221 patients undergoing mitral valvuloplasty from January 2015 to August 2018 in Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital were analyzed retrospectively, including 721 males and 500 females, with an average age of 47.2±15.1 years. According to the different surgical methods, they were divided into a study group (n=654), who received mitral valvuloplasty via the totally thoracoscopic approach, and a control group (n=567), who received mitral valvuloplasty via traditional median sternotomy. Clinical data, surgical results, and perioperative outcomes of the two groups were compared.ResultsThere was no significant difference in preoperative general data between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with the control group, the study group had longer cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic cross-clamping time (146.7±42.4 min vs. 122.7±30.6 min, 96.2±32.7 min vs. 78.3±23.8 min, both P=0.000), and shorter total operation time (227.4±55.3 min vs. 238.1±56.4 min, P=0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of secondary cross-clamping and mitral valve replacement between the two groups (3.7% vs. 2.6%, P=0.312; 1.7% vs. 1.4%, P=0.690). The blood transfusion rate and the incidence of respiratory tract infection and postoperative poor wound healing were lower (13.0% vs. 24.5%, 2.1% vs. 18.0%, 1.5% vs. 5.3%, all P=0.000) and the postoperative hospital stay was shorter (6.2±4.4 d vs. 11.5±8.8 d, P=0.000) in the study group. There was no significant difference in hospitalization expense between the two groups (95 847.9±31 322.0 yuan vs. 99 673.1±47 930.3 yuan, P=0.149). Within 30 d after surgery, 1 patient died in the study group and 4 patients died in the control group. Before discharge, there were 4 and 5 patients with severe mitral valve regurgitation in the study group and the control group, respectively.ConclusionCompared with mitral valvuloplasty via traditional median sternotomy, minimally invasive mitral valvuloplasty is superior in shortening operation time and postoperative hospital stay, lowering blood transfusion rate, and reducing postoperative complications, which can achieve better clinical outcomes.
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical effect of mitral valvuloplasty on children with Barlow disease combined with moderate to severe or severe mitral regurgitation.MethodsThe clinical data of 10 patients with Barlow disease combined with moderate to severe or severe mitral regurgitation in Fuwai Hospital from January 2014 to August 2019 were analyzed retrospectively, including 3 males and 7 females, with a mean age of 8.7±7.9 years. Echocardiography before and during the operation confirmed that the mitral valve leaflets were long and swinging, the valve leaflets and the opposite edge protruded into the left atrium and were higher than the level of the mitral valve rings, the mitral valve rings were dilated, the papillary muscles and tendons were long, and the pathological changes after the operation showed mucoid degenertion of the valve leaflets and tendons, and some fibrous foci hyperplasia. Mitral valve repair included implantation of artificial valve ring, implantation of artificial tendon, posterior leaflets sliding, partial resection of posterior leaflets (excluding sliding), valve leaflets folding, tendon folding, papillary muscle splitting and annular valve contraction (excluding artificial valve ring implantation). The technique of mitral valve repair, early clinical results and follow-up echocardiographic data were analyzed.ResultsAll the patients successfully completed the mitral valve repair. The mean time of aortic occlusion was 73.2±17.4 min, and cardiopulmonary bypass time was 99.5±19.8 min. At the same time, 4 patients received tricuspid valve repair and 1 funnel chest correction. There was no reoperation in perioperative period. The 1-year and 5-year survival rates were 100.0% and 100.0%, respectively. The incidence of below moderate mitral regurgitation was 90.0% at postoperative 1 year and 72.0% at postoperative 5 years.ConclusionFor the young children who have Barlow disease and mitral regurgitation, considering the characteristics of heavy lesions, small operation space, and the need to meet the growth and development of valve, it is suggested to adopt the surgical techniques different from those of older children, such as valve ring retraction and tendon folding, if necessary, to adopt "edge to edge" suture, which can shorten aortic occlusion time and achieve good early effects, and its long-term effects still need further follow-up observation. Mitral valvuloplasty technique for Barlow disease similar to that of adults can be used in older children, including implantation of artificial valve ring and implantation of artificial tendon, etc.
ObjectiveTo compare short- and medium-term effects of Leonardo da Vinci robot-assisted and traditional mitral valvuloplasty.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 74 patients who underwent mitral valvuloplasty in our hospital from January 2015 to March 2017. The patients were divided into two groups according to the mode of operation: a da Vinci group (n=29, 13 males, 16 females at an average age of 52 years) and a routine group (n=45, 18 males, 27 females at an average age of 53 years). The perioperative data of patients in the two groups were compared and analyzed.ResultsThere was no significant difference in sex, age, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), cardiac function (NYHA), hypertension, diabetes, postoperative blood transfusion and postoperative complications between the two groups (P>0.05). The tracheal intubation time, ICU retention time, hospital stay time, blood loss and postoperative drainage in the da Vinci group were shorter or less than those in the routine group (P<0.05). The operation time, cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic clamping time in the da Vinci group were longer than those in the routine group (P<0.05). Different surgical procedures had no significant effect on left atrial diameter (LAD), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and mitral regurgitation (MR) 3 years after operation. There was no interaction between the mode of operation and the time of follow-up. There was no significant difference in echocardiographic evaluation in the same period (P>0.05).ConclusionDa Vinci operation shortens the rehabilitation process of patients compared with traditional surgery. For short- and medium-term follow-up results, there is no difference between Leonardo da Vinci and traditional mitral valve surgeries, and the clinical effect of da Vinci robot-assisted mitral valvuloplasty is satisfactory, which is worthy of further clinical promotion.
ObjectiveTo report the short-term outcomes of a standardized, simplified and reproducible strategy of mitral valvuloplasty (MVP), which was focused on leaflet foldoplasty and anatomic anomalies of congenital mitral regurgitation (MR).MethodsConsecutive 74 patients who underwent MVP by our standardized strategy in our institution from 2016 to 2018 were included retrospectively. There were 30 males and 44 females with a median age of 18.5 (6-146) months and weight of 15.4 (7-51) kg.ResultsAnatomic anomalies of MR included: (1) subvalvular apparatus: 72 (97.3%) patients with mal-connected chordae tendineae, 31 (41.9%) with absent chordae tendineae and 14 (18.9%) with fused or dysplastic papillary muscle; (2) leaflet: 10 (13.5%) patients with cleft of anterior leaflet, 61 (82.4%) with leaflet prolapse including 56 (91.8%) with anterior leaflet prolapse; (3) annulus: 71 (95.9%) patients with annular dilatation. Leaflet foldoplasty was performed in 61 (82.4%) patients with leaflet prolapse. All patients were successfully discharged and 4 (5.4%) patients were with moderate MR. The follow-up time was 22.0 (9.1-41.8) months. During the follow-up period, 3 patients had moderate MR and 1 patient had reoperation for severe MR. All patients were in normal cardiac function with a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 66.0%±6.1%. In addition, the mean left ventricular end-diastolic dimension was 31.8±6.0 mm, which was significant smaller than that before the operation (t=6.090, P<0.000 1).ConclusionThe standardized leaflet foldoplasty with resection of mal-connected chordae tendineae and posterior annuloplasty technique is safe and feasible with favorable short-term outcomes in MR patients.
Objective To compare the early outcomes of domestic third-generation magnetically levitated left ventricular assist device (LVAD) with or without concomitant mitral valvuloplasty (MVP). Methods The clinical data of 17 end-stage heart failure patients who underwent LVAD implantation combined with preoperative moderate to severe mitral regurgitation in Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital from May 2018 to March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into a LVAD group and a LVAD+MVP group based on whether MVP was performed simultaneously, and early outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results There were 4 patients in the LVAD group, all males, aged (43.5±5.9) years, and 13 patients in the LVAD+MVP group, including 10 males and 3 females, aged (46.8±16.7) years. Compared with the LVAD group, the LVAD+MVP group had a lower pulmonary artery systolic pressure and pulmonary artery mean pressure 72 h after operation, but the difference was not statistically different (P>0.05). Pulmonary artery systolic pressure was significantly lower 1 week after operation, as well as pulmonary artery systolic blood pressure and pulmonary artery mean pressure at 1 month after operation (P<0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in blood loss, operation time, cardiopulmonary bypass time, aortic cross-clamping time, mechanical ventilation time, and ICU stay time between the two groups (P>0.05). The differences in 1-month postoperative mortality, acute kidney injury, reoperation, gastrointestinal bleeding, and thrombosis and other complications between the two groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusion Concomitant MVP with implantation of domestic third-generation magnetically levitated LVAD is safe and feasible, and concomitant MVP may improve postoperative hemodynamics without significantly increasing perioperative mortality and complication rates.
Objective To summarize the reoperation experience for mitral regurgitation with leaflet augmentation in children. Methods From 2018 to 2022, the patients who underwent reoperation for mitral regurgitation with leaflet augmentation after atrioventricular septal defect repair or mitral valve repair in Fuwai Hospital were retrospectively collected. The characteristics of mitral valve disease, key points of surgery and short and mid-term follow-up results were analyzed. Results Finally 24 patients were enrolled, including 6 males and 12 females with an average age of 49.1±29.1 months. The time interval from the primary valve surgery to the reoperation was 24.9±17.0 months. The cardiopulmonary bypass time was 150.1±49.5 min and the aortic clamp time was 94.0±24.2 min. There was no early death. The average follow-up period was 20.3±9.1 months. During the follow-up period, the mortality rate was 4.2%, the rate of reoperation was 4.3%, and the rate of moderate or severe mitral regurgitation was 13.0%. The left ventricular ejection fraction was 62.6%±6.7%. In addition, the mean left ventricular end-diastolic dimension was 35.8±7.8 mm, which was significant smaller than that before the operation (t=4.858, P<0.000 1). Conclusion The application of leaflet augmentation is a safe and effective treatment option with good results in the short and mid-term, which thus provides a good technical option for pediatric patients with recurrent mitral regurgitation.
Objective To explore the safety, effectiveness, and mid-term efficacy of total thoracoscopic mitral valvuloplasty (MVP) with chordal replacement (CR) and quadrangular resection (QR) for the treatment of mitral regurgitation (MR), and to provide reference for guiding the development and selection of clinical diagnosis and treatment methods for MR patients. Methods A prospective randomized controlled study was performed to collect patients with MR who underwent MVP at the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Leshan People's Hospital from January 2021 to March 2022. They were randomly divided into a CR group and a QR group by using a random number table, and were followed up for 12 months after the operation. The medical history, perioperative data and adverse cardiac endpoint events during the follow-up period were collected. The differences in surgical efficacy between the two groups were evaluated and compared, and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the differences in survival rates between the two groups of patients. Results A total of 100 patients were enrolled. There were 46 patients in the CR group, including 27 males and 19 females with an average age of 49.50±9.23 years; there were 46 patients in the QR group, including 24 males and 22 females with an average age of 49.91±11.48 years. The aortic occlusion time in the CR group was longer than that in the QR group (P<0.05). Other surgical indicators, including total surgical time, extracorporeal circulation time, ventilator-assisted time, ICU hospitalization time, size of the valve ring, concomitant surgery during the same period, and the incidence of perioperative complications were not statistically different between the two groups (P>0.05). The left atrium diameter, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, left ventricular end-diastolic volume, left ventricular end-systolic volume, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of the two groups before discharge after the surgery were significantly improved compared to those before surgery (P<0.05). There was a statistical difference in LVEF between the two groups before discharge after the surgery (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in clinical efficacy between the two groups (P>0.05). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the overall incidence of exemption from mild and above mitral regurgitation 12 months after the surgery in the CR group and QR group was 84.8% and 89.1%, respectively. According to the log-rank test, there was no statistical difference in the overall survival curve between the two groups (χ2=0.356, P=0.551). Conclusion CR and QR are both safe and effective methods for the treatment of simple posterior MR.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical outcomes of mitral valvuloplasty (MVP) and mitral valve replacement (MVR) for infective endocarditis, and to investigate the effect of MVP under different surgical risks. MethodsA retrospective study was done on the patients with mitral infective endocarditis, who underwent surgical treatment in our department from January 2018 to March 2022. Among them, the patients receiving mitral valve repair were divided into a MVP group, and the patients receiving mitral valve replacement were divided into a MVR group. Propensity score matching method was applied with a ratio of 1∶1 to eliminate the biases. The early and midterm outcomes were compared between the two groups after matching. According to the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation Ⅱ(EuroSCORE-Ⅱ), the effect of MVP was compared between high and low risk patients. ResultsA total of 195 patients were collected. There were 141 patients in the MVP group (102 males, 85.1%) and 54 patients in the MVR group (41 males, 75.9%). Patients in the MVP group were younger (43.0±14.6 years vs. 57.0±13.0, P<0.001) and had better preoperative conditions. The mean follow-up time was 30.4±16.1 months. The patients in the MVP group had a shorter ICU stay (5.0±5.4 d vs. 7.0±7.0 d, P=0.037), and lower incidences of low cardiac output syndrome (0.7% vs. 9.3%, P=0.007), in-hospital mortality (0.0% vs. 3.7%, P=0.023), and follow-up mortality (4.3% vs. 15.4%, P=0.007). However, after 1∶1 propensity score matching, there were no statistical differences in the postoperative and follow-up adverse events between the two groups (P>0.05). Also, there was no statistical difference in the mortality of high-risk patients between MVP and MVR group (P>0.05). There was no statistical difference in the reoperation and recurrent severe mitral regurgitation between high and low-risk patients in the MVP group (P>0.05). Conclusion MVP is feasible for treating mitral lesions caused by infective endocarditis with good early and midterm outcomes. For patients who have severe preoperative conditions without serious valvular lesions, surgeons could try MVP.