This paper aims to investigate the value of diffusiion weighted imaging (DWI) and different apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) methods to predict the curative effects of neoadjuvant chempotherapy (NAC) for breast cancer. From March 2010 to December 2012, seventy-one patients were pathologically confirmed invasive breast cancer by needle puncture biopsy received before surgery, and underwent magnetic resonance before and after NAC, the ADC were measured by mean ADC method and lower ADC method. The pathologic response after NAC was divided to major histological response (MHR) group and non-major histological response (NMHR) group according to Miller & Payne system. Results displayed that ADC values obtained before NAC, at the end of the second cycle of NAC, and after whole course of treatment, had good correlations between mean and lower ADC methods (the Pearson's correlation=0.699, 0.749 and 0.895, respectively). Significant difference in ADC obtained both with mean and lower ADC methods could be found between MHR and NMHR groups after the second cycle of NAC (P<0.05). After the second cycle of NAC, significant difference in the change rate of ADC could be found between MHR and NMHR groups by using lower ADC method (P<0.05), but not be found by using mean ADC method (P＞0.05). In conclusion, DWI could monitor the pathologic changes of breast cancer after NAC, and the lower ADC method might be used to evaluate the curative effect of NAC with the change rate of ADC.
Objective To summarize the progress of biological indexes which could predict the efficiency of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Methods Various related researches were collected to make a review. Results Many indexes linked to the efficiency of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer according to several studies. According to many studies, indexes such as human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) gene, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), Ki-67, P53 gene, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet level, and mean platelet volume (MPV) may have association with the outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in treatment of breast cancer, and these factors maybe individual biomarkers to predict the efficiency of the treatment, but no coincident conclusion has been reached for these indexes. Conclusion The value of these indexes that predict the efficiency of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is not sure, further study need to be done to solve this topic.
Objective To explore the tumor shrinking pattern, the image evaluation methods of the residual lesions after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and the indications, the resection range, the surgical margins, the management of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and axillary lymph nodes of breast conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods Domestic and foreign literatures about the breast conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were collected and reviwed. Results Breast conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy raised the rate of breast conserving surgery and improved the postoperative life quality of patients, while the overall survival rate had no significant difference compared with mastectomy. Tumor shrinking pattern and its related factors after neoadjuvant chemotherapy remain required further study. At present, the indications for breast conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy still mainly refered to that for early stage breast cancer. Resection range was more recognized to the scope of residual tumor lesions after chemotherapy. The margins were more widely accepted as which were without tumor involved. Although there were some controversies about the use of SLNB and the management of axillary lymph nodes based on the results of SLNB in breast conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, it was still considered necessary at the basis of the accurate biopsy technique acquired. Conclusions At present, breast conserving treatment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is considered safe and effective. However, it is necessary to proceed cautiously under the conditions of adequate communication of local recurrence rate, standardized local treatment, standard postoperative radiotherapy, systemic adjuvant therapy, and regular follow-up.
Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy followed by minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for locally advanced esophageal cancer. Methods We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 56 consecutive patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer treated by neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery in our hospital between January 2015 and December 2016. There were 51 males and 5 females. The patients were divided into 2 groups. Neoadjuvant therapy followed by open surgery esophagectomy group was as an OE group with 25 patients aged 61 (50-73) years. And neoadjuvant therapy followed by MIE was as a MIE group with 31 patients aged 60 (55-79) years. Results The pathologic complete response (pCR) rate of 28 patients with neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy was significantly higher than that of 28 patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (21.4% vs. 10.7%, P<0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, R2 rate and the number of lymph nodes dissection in the MIE group were obviously better than those of the OE group with statistical differences (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the number of resected lymph nodes along the bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerves and lymph node metastasis rate (P>0.05) between the two groups. The incidence of postoperative respiratory complications in the MIE group was lower than that of the OE group (P=0.041). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of other complications, re-operation, re-entry to ICU, median length of stay or perioperative deaths (P>0.05). There was only one patient with neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the OE group died due to gastric fluid asphyxia caused by trachea-esophageal fistula. Conclusion Neoadjuvant therapy followed by MIE for locally advanced esophageal cancer is safe and feasible. The oncological outcomes seem comparable regardless of OE.
Small cell lung cancer is a pathological type with higher malignancy in lung cancer, and has biological characteristics different from non-small cell lung cancer, such as rapid growth, high malignancy and poor prognosis. Mediastinal lymph node and distant metastasis occur frequently. In recent years, the treatment of limited-stage small cell lung cancer has been stagnant, and various treatments are poor. The operation is mainly suitable for patients with small cell lung cancer (T1-2N0M0). Small cell lung cancer has strong sensitivity to chemotherapy, but the clinical application of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in T1-2N0M0 small cell lung cancer remains controversial. This article reviewed the value of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of T1-2N0M0 small cell lung cancer.
Objective To investigate the significance of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of limited-disease small cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC). Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 55 LD-SCLC patients who underwent surgery in the Department of Thoracic Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital from May 2007 to August 2016. There were 42 males and 13 females with a mean age of 57 years. All patients underwent clinical staging before treatment. According to the different treatments, the patients were divided into two groups, a preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and a direct surgery group. The comparison of long-term survival rates was made between the two groups. Results Among the 55 patients, median survival time was 27 months. The 1-, 3-, 5-year survival rate was 89.1%, 45.0%, 33.8% respectively. Treatment methods and clinical N stage were significantly different in prognosis (P<0. 05). The results of Cox proportional hazards regression model showed that clinical N stage was prognostic factor of LD-SCLC patients (P<0. 05). Conclusion Patients with clinical stage Ⅰ and Ⅱ SCLC are better to receive direct surgery. For patients with clinical stage Ⅲ, it is recommended to reach partial response or complete response with neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery. The status of lymph node metastasis is closely related to survival, thus identifying the accurate clinical stage is crucial before treatment.
Objective To investigate whether postoperative therapy can bring survival benefits to patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who have received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with TP regimen. Methods We retrospectively reviewed clinical data of 115 patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with TP regimen and underwent esophagectomy in our hospital from January 2007 through December 2016. Patients were divided into two groups including a non-receiving treatment group (54 patients with 47 males and 7 females) and a receiving treatment group (61 patients with 52 males and 9 females). There were 31 patients with postoperative chemotherapy, 14 with postoperative radiotherapy, and 16 with postoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy in the receiving treatment group. Results In the non-receiving treatment group, the 5-year median disease free survival (DFS) rate was 54.7%, and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 55.3%. In the receiving treatment group, the median DFS was 46.0 months (95% CI 22.9–69.1), the 5-year DFS rate was 42.3%; and the median OS was 68.0 months (95% CI 33.0–103.0), the 5-year OS rate was 51.3%. Furthermore, there was no statistical difference between the two groups with regards to DFS (P=0.641) or OS (P=0.757) using Kaplan-Meier method. Besides, in each subgroup, the results of Cox proportional hazard model analysis showed postoperative treatment did not improve survival (P>0.05, respectively). Conclusion Postoperative treatment does not bring survival benefits to patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who have received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with TP regimen.
ObjectiveTo investigate whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone may affect recent anal function in patients with rectal cancer.MethodsThe structured data from the December 3, 2018 version of Database from Colorectal Cancer (DACCA) of West China Hospital were extracted . The follow-up investigation was performed within 2 weeks from December 3, 2018 to December 16, 2018 by the telephone. The postoperative anal function of patients with rectal cancer was evaluated by the lower anterior resection symptom (LARS) score questionnaire.ResultsA total of 209 patients with rectal cancer treated by the total mesolectal excision in the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery of West China Hospital were included. One hundred and thirty-six patients of them were only treated with TME, while the other 73 patients were treated by the TME and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. As for the baseline data of the 2 groups, there was no difference in the age, body mass index, gender, surgical procedure, differentiation degree or anastomotic position (P>0.050), while the pathological staging (P=0.022) and postoperative recovery time (P<0.001) had the significant differences between these 2 groups. The postoperative 1-year LARS score was not associated with the gender, age, body mass index, pathological stage, physical comorbidity, neoadjuvant chemotherapy or time of postoperative recovery (P>0.050), but which was associated with the heart disease (P=0.019) or position of anastomosis (P=0.005). Moreover, the multivariate analysis showed that the higher anastomosis position was a protective factor for the LARS after 1 year (OR=0.706, P=0.003).ConclusionsThere is no significant difference in postoperative anal function between patients with rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy or not . It suggests that neoadjuvant chemotherapy has no more additional adverse effects on postoperative anal function in patients either.
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical application of oncoplastic surgery in breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.MethodsFrom May 2016 to May 2018, 32 breast cancer patients (cT2–3N0–3M0) who were scheduled for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and agreed to accept breast-conserving surgery after NAC in the Henan Tumor Hospital were enrolled into the retrospective study. These patients were originally unable to perform traditional breast conserving surgery because of the size or location of the tumor. We observed the success rate, safety and cosmetic effects of breast-conserving therapy, which were applicated of tumor down-staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with oncoplastic surgery.ResultsIn this study, after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 31 patients achieved CR or PR, and 1 patient had SD. All 32 patients underwent breast-conserving surgery successfully, 3 patients underwent breast-conserving combined with volume replacement, and 29 patients underwent breast-conserving combined with volume displacement. One patient was not satisfied with the cosmetic effects, the other patients were satisfied or basically satisfied with the cosmetic effects. The median follow-up was 18 months (5–24 months), and no local recurrence or distant metastasis was found in 32 patients.ConclusionsBy tumor down-staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with oncoplastic surgery, we can make some patients who are originally not suitable for breast conserving due to tumor size and tumor location succeed in breast-conserving therapy, and the safety and cosmetic effect are basically satisfied.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of multicycle neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with apatinib in the treatment of advanced rectal cancer through the Database from Colorectal Cancer (DACCA).MethodsA total of 173 patients with advanced rectal cancer who underwent surgery after 2–4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with apatinib were selected from the DACCA (Version January 20, 2019). The patients were grouped by treated cycle and clinical TNM (cTNM) stage, and the overall variation of clinical and pathological indicators before and after treatment were compared.ResultsAmong 173 cases, 63 cases (36.42%), 45 cases (26.01%), and 65 cases (37.57%) were respectively in the 2, 3, and 4-cycle group; 54 cases (31.21%), 91 cases (52.60%), and 28 cases (16.18%) in stage Ⅱ, Ⅲ, and Ⅳ-group. Clinical response degree: complete pathologic response (cPR) was observed in 23 cases (13.29%), and the rate of conversion resection was 100% (173/173). Clinical response grade: complete response (CR) in 58 cases (33.53%), partial response (PR) in 93 cases (53.76%), stable disease (SD) in 21 cases (12.14%), progressive disease (PD) in 1 cases (0.58%). Tumor regression grade: TRG0 in 21 cases (12.57%), TRG1 in 22 cases (13.17%), TRG2 in 84 cases (50.30%), TRG3 in 40 cases (23.95%). There was a statistical difference in CEA before and after the treatment (P<0.001). All cases underwent radical resection, and the successful rate of transformed resection was 100%. There was significant difference on the clinical response grade among the cases of different treatment cycle (H=18.513, P<0.001), and the longer treatment cycle was correlated with better clinical response (G=–0.474, P<0.001). In addition, there was significant difference on the cPR rate among the cases of different cTNM stage (χ2=6.450, P=0.040).ConclusionsMulticycle neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with apatinib in treating patients with advanced rectal cancer is efficient. More treatment cycles lead to better efficacy. The lower cTNM stage maybe means more chance of achieving cPR and a satisfactory rate of conversion resection.