ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy of seven types of cognitive interventions for older adults with mild to moderate Alzheimer's Disease (AD).MethodsWe searched The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP and CBM databases to collect randomized controlled trials on cognitive interventions for mild to moderate Alzheimer's Disease (AD) from inception to January 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. STATA 14.0 software was then used to perform a meta-analysis.ResultsA total of 49 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. The results of network meta-analysis revealed that each cognitive intervention had significantly improved the cognitive ability of AD patients. Specifically, nursing intervention (NI) (MD=3.01, 95%CI 1.70 to 4.50, P<0.005) was the most effective enhancer of cognitive ability, followed by music therapy (MT) (MD=2.60, 95%CI 0.96 to 4.30, P<0.001), physical exercise (PE) (MD=2.4, 95%CI 1.0 to 3.9, P<0.001), cognitive rehabilitation (CR) (MD=2.3, 95% CI 0.92 to 3.7, P=0.013), cognitive simulation (CS) (MD=1.7, 95%CI 1.2 to 2.3, P=0.037), computerized cognitive training (CCT) (MD=1.6, 95%CI 0.42 to 2.8, P<0.001), and pharmacological therapies (PT) (MD=1.5, 95%CI 0.24 to 2.8, P=0.041).ConclusionsThe seven types of cognitive interventions are helpful in improving the cognitive ability of Alzheimer's patients, and nursing intervention is the most effective cognitive intervention. Moreover, non-pharmacological therapies may be better than pharmacological therapies.
Objective To compare the clinical effectiveness of different skin closure techniques in stoma reversal using network meta-analysis. Methods CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, CBM, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched until February 1, 2021, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing outcomes between different skin closure techniques were included. Data were processed using Stata MP16.0 and R 3.6.1. Results The results demonstrated that 16 RCTs (n=2 139) were eligible for pooling. Six types of skin closure techniques were used: linear closure, purse-string closure, gunsight closure, linear closure and drainage, purse-string closure and drainage, and linear closure and biological mesh. Network meta-analysis indicated that the incidence of postoperative infection with linear closure was higher than that with purse-string closure [RR=6.04, 95%CI (3.11, 16.89), P<0.0001], gunsight closure [RR=10.75, 95%CI (1.12, 152.12), P=0.04], and linear closure and drainage [RR=3.18, 95%CI (1.24, 10.20), P=0.03]. The purse-string closure was superior to linear closure and biological mesh [RR=0.15, 95%CI (0.01, 0.88), P=0.03] in reducing postoperative infection. The length of hospital stay after linear suture was longer than that after linear suture and drainage [MD=1.16, 95%CI (0.29, 2.20), P=0.02]. Conclusions This network meta-analysis suggests that purse-string closure and gunsight closure might be best for reducing postoperative infection, and the addition of drainage could not further reduce the incidence of postoperative infection. In addition, implantation of the biological mesh does not increase the risk of postoperative infection. However, a large-scale RCT is warranted to confirm the results.
Objective To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of different mesh fixation techniques in laparoscopic trans-abdominal preperitoneal hernia repair (TAPP) by using network meta-analysis. Methods CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, CBM, the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were retrieved to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) studies comparing different fixation methods of patches in laparoscopic TAPP. The retrieval time limit was from the establishment of the database to March 1, 2022. After two researchers independently screened the literatures, extracted the data, and evaluated the bias risk, Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted by using R4.1.2 software. Results Twenty-nine RCTs were included, including 4 095 patients. The results of network meta-analysis showed that the risk of chronic postoperative inguinal pain was higher in staples fixation than that of no fixation [OR=0.06, 95%CI (0.01, 0.26), P＜0.001], glue fixation [OR=0.21, 95%CI (0.04, 0.53), P=0.001] and self-gripping mesh [OR=0.09, 95%CI (0.01, 0.52), P=0.009], the incidence of chronic postoperative inguinal pain with suture fixation was higher than that with no fixation [OR=0.10, 95%CI (0.01, 0.70), P= 0.020]. Postoperative visual analogue scale of staples fixation was higher than those of no fixation [MD=–0.90, 95%CI (–1.49, –0.33), P=0.002] and glue fixation [MD=–0.92, 95%CI (–1.35, –0.49), P＜0.001], the postoperative visual analogue scale with suture fixation was higher than those of no fixation [MD=–0.83, 95%CI (–1.61, –0.08), P=0.030] and glue fixation [MD=–0.85, 95%CI (–1.56, –0.13), P=0.020]. There was no significant difference in the incidence of seroma and hematoma, hospital stay and hernia recurrence among different fixation methods. Conclusions The network meta-analysis shows that medical glue and self-gripping mesh have certain advantages in reducing chronic pain after surgery, which may be the better patch fixation method in TAPP. The non fixation mesh will not increase the risk of postoperative recurrence, and can be used in clinical practice. This conclusion needs to be further verified by large sample, long-term follow-up and high-quality RCTs.
Objective To assess the changes in depression symptoms in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) receiving combined treatment of deep brain stimulation (DBS) and antiparkinsonian drug therapy (DT) compared with under DT alone. Methods Related literature was retrieved from electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, and VIP databases. Stata 14.0 software was used for statistical analysis. Network meta-analysis was performed using frequentist model to compare different interventions with each other. Results Five cohort studies and seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. The total number of participants was 1241. Assessed by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) score as the primary outcome, patients who received DT alone showed worse outcome in depression as compared to those who received subthalamic nucleus (STN)-DBS plus DT [standardized mean difference (SMD)=0.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.01, 0.59), P<0.05], and there was no significant difference between the patients receiving globus pallidus interna (GPi)-DBS plus DT and those receiving STN-DBS plus DT [SMD=–0.12, 95%CI (–0.41, 0.16), P>0.05] or those receiving DT alone [SMD=–0.42, 95%CI (–0.84, 0.00), P>0.05]. Assessed by BDI-Ⅱ as the primary outcome, patients who received DT alone showed worse outcome in depression than those who received STN-DBS plus DT [SMD=0.29, 95%CI (0.05, 0.54), P<0.05]; compared with STN-DBS plus DT and DT alone, GPi-DBS plus DT was associated with better improvement in depression [SMD=–0.26, 95%CI (–0.46, –0.06), P<0.05; SMD=–0.55, 95%CI (–0.88, –0.23), P<0.05]. The ranking results of surface under the cumulative ranking curves showed that DBS plus DT had a better superiority in depression symptoms, and GPi-DBS was better than STN-DBS. Conclusion Compared with DT, STN-DBS plus DT is more likely to improve the depressive symptoms of PD patients, and GPi-DBS may be better than STN-DBS.
Objective To assess the improvement of different resistance training regimens on blood lipid metabolism and insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods PubMed, ProQuest, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, and VIP databases were searched to collect randomized controlled trials of resistance training intervention to improve blood lipids and insulin resistance in patients with T2DM. The search time range was from the establishment of the databases to May 2023. Two reviewers assessed the risk of bias of the included studies using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale, and performed a network meta-analysis of the extracted data using Stata 16.0 software. Results In the end, 24 articles were included, and a total of 983 participants were enrolled. The result of network meta-analysis showed that high-frequency and moderate-intensity resistance exercise significantly improved the levels of insulin resistance [standardized mean difference=−1.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) (−2.75, −0.67)], triglycerides [weighted mean difference (WMD)=−0.27 mmol/L, 95%CI (−0.51, −0.04) mmol/L], and total cholesterol [WMD=−0.16 mmol/L, 95%CI (−0.20, −0.12) mmol/L], but had no significant effect on improving the level of high-density lipoprotein [WMD=0.05 mmol/L, 95%CI (−0.02, 0.11) mmol/L] or low-density lipoprotein [WMD=−0.20 mmol/L, 95%CI (−0.42, 0.03) mmol/L]. The results of cumulative probability ranking showed that high-frequency and moderate-intensity resistance exercise was the best in improving insulin resistance, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein and low-density lipoprotein levels. Conclusion Based on current evidence, high-frequency and moderate-intensity resistance exercise may be the best resistance exercise regimen to improve insulin resistance and lipid metabolism in patients with T2DM.
ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of different β-blockers for preventing postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after cardiac surgery. Methods Databases of PubMed, Science Direct, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, SinoMed, CKNI, VIP, WanFang were searched by the computer from inception to April 31, 2022 to collect randomized controlled studies on the comparison of the effectiveness of different β-blockers for preventing POAF. Two investigators independently screened the literature and extracted information. The quality of the literature was evaluated using Cochrane bias risk tool, and RevMan 5.3 and STATA 17.0 were used for meta-analysis. Results A total of 17 randomized controlled studies with 3 290 patients were included. Direct meta-analysis showed that landiolol and metoprolol were more effective than placebo (P≤0.001), and carvedilol was more effective than metoprolol in preventing the development of POAF (P<0.001). Network meta-analysis showed that landiolol, carvedilol and metoprolol were more effective than placebo in preventing the incidence of POAF (P<0.05). Landiolol and carvedilol were more effective than metoprolol, and carvedilol were more effective than nebivolol (P<0.05). The surface under the cumulative ranking curve from high to low were carvedilol, landilol, propranolol, atenolol, metoprolol, and nebivolol. Conclusion Carvedilol and landilol have different degrees of improvement in the occurrence of POAF, and carvedilol has the best preventive effect. More studies are required to verify the strength of evidence due to the limited sample size.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the therapeutic effects of different surgical procedures for ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR). MethodsComputer searches were conducted in CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, CBM, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, and Web of Science, with the search time limit from the inception of the databases to February 2024. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, used the Cochrane bias risk assessment tool to evaluate the quality of the included studies, and used Stata 17.0 software to analyze the data. ResultsA total of 19 randomized controlled trials involving 6139 patients were finally included, involving six surgical procedures, and the overall quality of the included studies was relatively high. The results of the network Meta-analysis showed that the 30-day all-cause mortality rate of mitral valve repair (MVr) was significantly lower than that of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) [OR=0.24, 95%CI (0.07, 0.87)], mitral valve replacement (MVR) [OR=0.43, 95%CI (0.23, 0.79)], CABG+MVR [OR=0.21, 95%CI (0.04, 0.95)] and transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair (TEER) using MitraClip [OR=0.13, 95%CI (0.02, 0.87)]. The 30-day all-cause mortality rate of CABG+MVr was significantly lower than that of CABG [OR=0.56, 95%CI (0.33, 0.93)] and CABG+MVR [OR=0.48, 95%CI (0.24, 0.94)], and the best probability ranking results showed that MVR might be the most effective in reducing the 30-day all-cause mortality rate. The incidence of renal complications in CABG+MVr was significantly lower than that in CABG+MVR [OR=0.42, 95%CI (0.21, 0.83)]; the best probability ranking results showed that CABG+MVr might be the most effective in reducing renal complications. ConclusionThe current limited evidence suggests that CABG+MVr and MVR may be the best surgical intervention methods for IMR patients at present. Due to the limitations of the number and quality of included studies, the above conclusions still need to be verified by more high-quality studies.
ObjectiveTo explore the best neoadjuvant treatment strategy for esophageal cancer and provide a theoretical basis for clinical formulation of neoadjuvant treatment plan. MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP were searched from inception to May 2022. Two researchers independently performed literature screening and data extraction. The quality of the studies was evaluated by the Cochrane risk of bias tool, and data analysis was performed in RStudio environment using R3.6.3 software. ResultsA total of 24 studies were included, covering 5 286 patients treated with surgery alone, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT), neoadjuvant radiotherapy (NRT), or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) followed by combined surgical treatment. The risk of bias of the studies was low. The results of the network meta-analysis showed that combined surgical treatments after NCRT [HR=0.77, 95%CI (0.70, 0.85)] and NCT [HR=0.89, 95%CI (0.81, 0.98)] were effective methods to improve patients' overall survival (OS) compared with surgery alone. In addition, NCRT could significantly reduce the incidence of local recurrence [OR=0.43, 95%CI (0.30, 0.58)] and distant metastasis [OR=0.71, 95%CI (0.52, 0.93)] in patients with esophageal cancer. However, NCRT [RR=1.30, 95%CI (0.77, 2.20)] increased the mortality rate of patients at 30 d after surgery. ConclusionThe available evidence suggests that NCRT combined with surgery is the best option for treating patients with resectable esophageal cancer, but this treatment carries the risk of increased 30 d postoperative mortality. Future studies should focus on optimizing the NCRT regimen with the aim of improving patients’ OS while effectively reducing postoperative mortality. In addition, more high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to support the results of the study.
Objective To evaluate the effect of different non-pharmacological interventions on the cognitive function of elderly people with cognitive decline, and provide useful reference for improving cognitive function of the elderly. Methods Computer searches of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP Database, Wanfang Data, and China Biomedical Literature Database for randomized controlled trials on non-pharmacological interventions for aged adults with cognitive decline were conducted, all with a search time frame from database inception to October 9th, 2023. Literature screening, information extraction and bias risk assessment using RevMan 5.4 software were performed by two evaluators independently, and Stata 16.0 and R 4.3.0 software was used for network meta-analysis. Results A total of 27 articles involving 2149 elderly patients and 7 intervention protocols were included. Among the 27 articles, 8 were graded A and 19 were graded B for quality. The network meta-analysis revealed that, using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) as the evaluating metric, virtual reality [mean difference (MD)=6.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.90, 10.75)], cognitive training [MD=4.99, 95%CI (0.56, 9.12)], and exercise training [MD=3.88, 95%CI (0.47, 7.27)] were better than community services, respectively (P<0.05), and exercise training was also better than conventional care [MD=3.05, 95%CI (0.92, 5.12), P<0.05]; using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) as the evaluation indicator, multimodal exercise [MD=3.00, 95%CI (0.89, 4.96)], cognitive training [MD=2.50, 95%CI (0.27, 4.82)], traditional Chinese exercise [MD=2.30, 95%CI (0.34, 4.28)], psychotherapy [MD=1.76, 95%CI (0.56, 2.96)], and exercise training [MD=1.36, 95%CI (0.18, 2.59)] were better than conventional care, respectively (P<0.05), and multimodal exercise [MD=3.32, 95%CI (0.62, 5.81)], cognitive training [MD=2.82, 95%CI (0.75, 4.90)], and traditional Chinese exercise [MD=2.63, 95%CI (0.08, 5.13)] were also better than community service, respectively (P<0.05). The results of the cumulative probability ranking showed that virtual reality had the highest probability of being the best intervention in terms of improving MoCA metrics (0.863), and multimodal exercise had the highest probability of being the best intervention in terms of improving MMSE metrics (0.868). Conclusion Using MoCA as an evaluation indicator, virtual reality may be the best non-pharmacological intervention; using MMSE as an evaluation indicator, multimodal exercise may be the best non-pharmacological intervention.