Objective To assess the clinical application value of tranforaminal unilateral approach for bilateral decompression by comparing the short-term effectiveness of bilateral decompression via unilateral approach of intervertebral foramen with via small surgical incision of bilateral spinous process in lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Methods Between July 2014 and June 2015, 48 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis underwent decompression and internal fixation by unilateral approach in 24 cases (trial group) and by bilateral small incision approach in 24 cases (control group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, disease type, involved segment, combined medical diseases, preoperative level of creatine phosphokinase (CPK), the visual analogue scale (VAS), and Oswestry disability index (ODI) between 2 groups (P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, hospitalization time, and the incidence of complications were recorded. The CPK levels were evaluated at 1, 3, and 7 days after operation. VAS score and ODI were used to evaluate the effectiveness, and lumbar X-ray film or CT scanning to determine the intervertebral bony fusion. Results There was no significant difference in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and hospitalization time between 2 groups (P>0.05), but significant difference was found in postoperative drainage (t=5.547,P=0.000). At 1 day after operation, the level of CPK in the trial group was significantly lower than that in the control group (t=3.129,P=0.005), but there was no significant difference at 3 and 7 days after operation between 2 groups (P>0.05). The patients were followed up 12-24 months (mean, 17 months). All the wounds healed primarily. Heart failure occurred in 1 case of the trial group, and cerebrospinal fluid leakage and pulmonary infection, and nerve root injury occurred in 1 case of the control group respectively. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between 2 groups (χ2=0.273,P=0.602). The interbody fusion rate was 95.8% (23/24) in the trial group and was 91.7% (22/24) in the control group, showing no significant difference (χ2=0.356,P=0.551). No cage sink, dislocation or plate and screw loosening and breakage was found in 2 groups. No adjacent segment degeneration occurred during the follow-up, and there was no change of scoliosis and lumbar sagittal curvature. At 3, 6, and 12 months after operation, the VAS score and ODI were significantly improved when compared with the preoperative scores in 2 groups (P<0.05), and the VAS score and ODI of the trial group were significantly better than those of control group (P<0.05). Conclusion The bilateral decompression via unilateral approach of intervertebral foramen and small surgical incision of bilateral spinous process in lumbar interbody fusion have satisfactory efficacy for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis, but the tranforaminal unilateral approach has the advantages of less trauma, avoidance of bilateral muscle stripping and soft paraspinal muscle injury, retention of posterior spinal structure, faster postoperative recovery, shorter hospital stay and good short-term effectiveness.
ObjectiveTo review the evaluation method of paraspinal muscle and its role in lumbar spine diseases, and offer reference for further research on paraspinal muscles.MethodsThe related literature of paraspinal muscle measurement and its role in lumbar spine diseases was reviewed. The evaluation methods of paraspinal muscle were analyzed from the advantages and disadvantages and the role of paraspinal muscle in lumbar spine diseases was summarized.ResultsRadiographic methods are often used to evaluate the atrophy of paraspinal muscle, mainly including CT and MRI. The cross-sectional area and fatty infiltration of paraspinal muscle are two key parameters. Radiographic methods are reproducible and widely applied, but CT has the disadvantage of radiation exposure, while the cost of MRI is high. Besides, more and more researchers focus on the functional evaluation of paraspinal muscle, which mainly includes surface electromyogram analysis and back muscle strength test. The surface electromyogram analysis can quantitatively measure neuromuscular function, but the results could be affected by many influencing factors. The back muscle strength test is simple, but it lacks standardized posture. The atrophy of paraspinal muscle is related to many lumbar spine diseases, while the results of different researches are different.ConclusionThere are many methods to evaluate paraspinal muscles, but there is no unified standard. The role of paraspinal muscle in lumbar spine diseases need to be further studied.
Objective To measure the paraspinal muscle parameters, explore the characteristics of paraspinal muscles, and investigate the influence factors of paraspinal muscle degeneration in healthy people. MethodsEighty-two healthy Chinese people were prospectively recruited between February 2020 and November 2020, including 36 males and 46 females. The age ranged from 21 to 75 years, with a mean of 48.0 years. The height ranged from 150 to 183 cm, with a mean of 165.6 cm. The body mass ranged from 43 to 100 kg, with a mean of 65.4 kg. The body mass index (BMI) ranged from 16.7 to 32.4 kg/m2, with a mean of 23.7 kg/m2. Parameters of the paraspinal muscles (multifidus muscle, erector spinae muscle, and psoas major muscle) at L3, L4, and L5 levels were measured by MRI, including the relative total cross-sectional area (rtCSA), relative fatty cross-sectional area (rfCSA), relative signal intensity (rSI), and fatty infiltration (FI). The differences of paraspinal muscle parameters at different genders and different measurement levels were compared; Pearson or Spearman correlation analysis was used to explore the relationship between paraspinal muscle parameters and age, height, body mass, BMI. Results From L3 to L5 level, the rtCSA and rfCSA of multifidus muscle and psoas major muscle as well as the rfCSA of erector spinae muscle increased, while rtCSA of erector spinae muscle decreased. The FI and rSI of paraspinal muscles increased gradually. The parameters of paraspinal muscles at L4 and L5 levels were significantly different from those at L3 levels (P<0.05). There were significant differences in rtCSA and rfCSA of multifidus muscle, rtCSA, FI, and rSI of erector spinae muscle as well as rtCSA, rfCSA, and FI of psoas major muscle between L4 and L5 levels (P<0.05). Compared with males, the rfCSA and FI of multifidus muscle, FI of erector spinae muscle, and FI of psoas major muscle were significantly higher in females, while the rtCSA of psoas major muscle was significantly lower (P<0.05). Age was significantly negatively correlated with rtCSA of paraspinal muscles (P<0.05), but significantly positively correlated with FI of paraspinal muscles, rfCSA and rSI of multifidus and erector spinae muscles (P<0.05). Height was significantly negatively correlated with rfCSA and FI of paraspinal muscles (P<0.05). ConclusionThe degree of paraspinal muscle degeneration increases gradually along the spine axis from head to tail. Paraspinal muscle degeneration is related to age, height, and gender. The relationship between the body mass, BMI and paraspinal muscle degeneration needs further study.