ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of intermittent Pringle (IP) and continuous hemi-hepatic vascular inflow occlusion (CHVIO) on the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) complicated with cirrhosis in laparoscopic liver resection (LLR).MethodsRetrospective analysis of consecutive 107 LLR patients with HCC complicated with liver cirrhosis at West China Hospital of Sichuan University between January 2015 and December 2017 was performed. Patients were divided into an IP group and a CHVIO group according to the method of hepatic vascular occlusion, intraoperative and postoperative outcome indicators and short-term prognosis were compared between the two groups.ResultsPatients in the IP group had shorter operative time [(237+90) min vs (285+118) min, P=0.041] and less blood loss [(279+24) mL vs (396+35) mL, P=0.012], without a significant increase in postoperative liver function [including ALT, AST, TBIL, and ALB], postoperative complications, induced flow, 1-year disease-free survival, and1-year survival (P>0.05).ConclusionsIP can reduce the operative time and blood loss in patients with HCC complicated with cirrhosis in LLR, and will not lead to deterioration of liver function, it is a recommended hepatic inflowocclusion method.
ObjectiveTo explore the effect of body mass index (BMI) on the outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for esophageal hiatal hernia.MethodsWe divided the patients who underwent hiatal hernioraphy and fundoplication surgery in our hospital between July 2013 and June 2018 into two groups according to the BMI: a group A, BMI ≥24 kg/m2, 77 patients, 41 males, 36 females, with an average age of 42 years; a group B: BMI<24 kg/m2, 63 patients, 38 males, 25 females, with an average age of 67 years, and the age, gender, type of hiatal hernia, score of subjective feeling of symptoms, level of reflux esophagitis were analyzed with the propensity score matching method. Fifty one patients were successfully matched in each group, and the curative effect of surgery was compared between the two groups.ResultsThere was no statistical difference in the type of surgery, intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, and hospital stay between the two groups (P>0.05). The operative time of the group A was significantly longer than that of the group B (P=0.023). There was no statistical difference between the two groups in postoperative recurrence (P=0.741).ConclusionThe operative time in overweight patients is significantly longer than that in the non-overweight patients, but it has no effect on the surgical outcomes and complications.
ObjectiveTo investigate the safety, feasibility and advantages of subxiphoid uni-portal thoracoscopic thymectomy.MethodsClinical data of 65 patients undergoing subxiphoid uni-portal thoracoscopic thymectomy in our hospital from September 2018 to March 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. They were treated as a subxiphoid surgery group, including 36 males and 29 females, aged 49.5 (29-71) years. The incision with the length of about 3 cm was located approximately 1 cm under the xiphoid process. From January 2016 to December 2017, 65 patients received intercostal uni-portal thoracoscopic thymectomy, who were treated as a control group, including 38 males and 27 females, aged 48.9 (33-67) years. All patients who were clinically diagnosed with thymic tumor before surgery were treated with total thymectomy. After surgery, expectoration and analgesia were used.ResultsThere was no statistically significant difference in general clinical data, lesion size, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative catheterization time, postoperative hospital stay and postoperative pathology between the two groups. All operations were successfully completed, and the patients in both groups recovered uneventfully after surgery. Visual analogue scale scores on the 1st, 3rd, 7th and 30th day after surgery in the subxiphoid surgery group were lower than those in the control group.ConclusionThe subxiphoid uni-portal thoracoscopic approach can achieve total thymectomy with less trauma and faster postoperative recovery.
ObjectiveTo compare the the effectiveness of robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) with video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), in stageⅠ lung adenocarcinoma.MethodsFrom January 2012 to December 2018, 291 patients were included. The patients were allocated into two groups including a RATS group with 125 patients and a VATS group with 166 patients. Two cohorts (RATS, VATS ) of clinical stageⅠ lung adenocarcinoma patients were matched by propensity score. Then there were 114 patients in each group (228 patients in total). There were 45 males and 69 females at age of 62±9 years in the RATS group; 44 males, 70 females at age of 62±8 years in the VATS group. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were assessed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with the outcomes.Results Compared with the VATS group, the RATS group got less blood loss (P<0.05) and postoperative drainage (P<0.05) with a statistical difference. There was no statistical difference in drainage time (P>0.05) or postoperative hospital stay (P>0.05) between the two groups. The RATS group harvested more stations and number of the lymph nodes with a statistical difference (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in 1-year, 3-year and 5-year OS and mean survival time (P>0.05). While there was a statistical difference in DFS between the two groups (1-year DFS: 94.1% vs. 95.6%; 3-year DFS: 92.6% vs. 75.2%; 5-year DFS: 92.6% vs. 68.4%, P<0.05; mean DFS time: 78 months vs. 63 months, P<0.05) between the two groups. The univariate analysis found that the number of the lymph nodes dissection was the prognostic factor for OS, and tumor diameter, surgical approach, stations and number of the lymph nodes dissection were the prognostic factors for DFS. However, multivariate analysis found that there was no independent risk factor for OS, but the tumor diameter and surgical approach were independently associated with DFS.ConclusionThere is no statistical difference in OS between the two groups, but the RATS group gets better DFS.
ObjectiveTo compare the intraoperative, postoperative indicators and economic costs of varicose veins patients between day surgery and inpatient surgery, and to explore the safety and benefit of large-scale varicose veins day surgery in China.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted to collect varicose veins patients in West China Hospital of Sichuan University from January 2016 to January 2019. Patients were divided into the day surgery group and the inpatient surgery group, and the subjects were matched by the propensity score matching (PSM) method according to the basic characteristic data. Intraoperative and postoperative indicators and economic costs were compared between the two groups.ResultsA total of 1 806 varicose vein patients were enrolled in the study, and 502 patients were enrolled in each of the two groups after PSM matching. After matching, there were no statistically significant differences in gender, age, nationality, marriage status, working status, residence, number of operative legs, medical insurance type, grade of American Society of Anesthesiologists, and complications (including hypertension, diabetes, coronary heart disease, and respiratory system diseases) between the two groups (P>0.05), which were comparable and the differences were not statistically significant. Compared with the inpatient surgery group, the day surgery group had shorter hospital stay, less intraoperative infusion volume, lower total cost, bed cost, nursing cost, drug cost, examination cost, medical insurance, and out-of-pocket (P<0.05). ConclusionThe varicose veins day surgery is not only safe and effective, but also can reduce the medication insurance payment.
ObjectiveTo compare clinical effect of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and open repeated hepatectomy (ORH) in treatment of liver cancer with late recurrence (recurrence time >12 months) and single tumor diameter ≤5 cm.MethodsThe patients with advanced intrahepatic recurrence after first operation for liver cancer in this hospital from January 2013 to December 2019 were retrospectively collected, who were treated with ORH (ORH group) or percutaneous RFA (RFA group) and met the inclusion criteria. The overall survival rate and disease-free survival rate of the two groups were compared after 1∶1 matching by propensity score matching (PSM), while the factors affecting survival were stratified.ResultsA total of 244 patients with recurrent liver cancer were collected, including 134 patients in the ORH group, 110 patients in the RFA group. The patients in the two groups were matched with 1∶1 by PSM, 90 patients in each group. The median overall survival time of the ORH group and the RFA group was 54 months and 45 months, respectively. There were no significant differences in the curves of cumulative overall survival and cumulative disease-free survival between the two groups (P=0.221, P=0.199). The incidence of severe complications in the ORH group was higher than that in the RFA group (10.00% versus 2.22%, P=0.029). A further subgroup analysis showed that the overall survival time of the ORH group was longer than that of the RFA group when the diameter of recurrent liver cancer was 3 to 5 cm (P=0.035), which had no significant differences for the patients with AFP (>400 μg/L or ≤400 μg/L), tumors number (single or multiple), and tumor diameter ≤3 cm between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionsPercutaneous RFA is effective and safe in treatment of advanced recurrent liver cancer, its overall survival and disease-free survival are similar to ORH treatment. However, when diameter of recurrent tumor is3–5 cm, ORH treatment has a advantage in prolonging survival time of patients.
Objective To explore the evolving strategies and compare perioperative and long-term outcomes of tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) in recent 20 years in our hospital.MethodsBetween 1998 and 2018, the clinical data of 608 patients who underwent TVR at the Department of Cardiac Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. There were 201 males and 407 females, with a median age of 47.0 (36.0, 57.0) years. Patients were divided into a biological tricuspid valve (BTV, n=427) group and a mechanical tricuspid valve (MTV, n=181) group. Propensity score matching was used to balance the baseline difference. Surgical strategy evolving, postoperative and long-term outcomes were analyzed between the two groups.ResultsSince 2008, the usage ratio of biological valves was significantly higher than that of mechanical valves. Seventy-nine (13.0%) patients died in hospital after TVR. Before propensity score matching, the postoperative mortality of the BTV group was higher than that of the MTV group (15.2% vs. 7.7%, P=0.012), and there was no statistical difference between the two groups after matching (10.4% vs. 7.2%, P=0.372). The duration of postoperative ventilator support in the BTV group was longer than that in the MTV group [22.0 (15.0, 37.0) h vs. 19.0 (11.0, 27.0) h, P=0.003], and the incidence of postoperative dialysis and re-thoracotomy exploring for bleeding was higher in the BTV group (8.9 % vs. 2.8%, 9.4% vs. 6.6%, respectively). However, there was no statistical difference in mortality after matching. The median follow-up time of discharged patients was 101.0 (65.0, 147.0) months, ranged from 1 to 265 months, and the follow-up rate was 82.2%. During the follow-up period, there were 101 deaths (19.1%) of whom 68 were from the BTV group and 33 from the MTV group. The survival rates at 1 year, 5 years, 10 years, 15 years and 20 years of all patients were 85.0% (95%CI 82.2-87.9), 78.9% (95%CI 75.7-82.4), 71.1% (95%CI 67.3-75.3), 59.7% (95%CI 54.2-65.6) and 51.7% (95%CI 43.3-60.7), and there was no statistical difference between the two groups after matching (P=0.46). The median time of tricuspid valve failure was 84.0 (54.0-111.0) months.ConclusionTVR is associated with high perioperative risks. There is no statistical difference in early mortality and long-term survival between biological and mechanical valve, while patients with mechanical valve has higher risk of re-operation for valve failure. Therefore, the type of prosthetic valve can be selected according to the patients' age, physical condition and the doctors’ experience.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the short- and mid-term outcomes of sequential anastomosis and simple anastomosis of saphenous vein in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.MethodsThe clinical data of 438 patients who underwent sequential anastomosis of saphenous vein and 165 patients who underwent simple anastomosis of saphenous vein from 2015 to 2018 in Daxing Teaching Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. After propensity score matching, 130 pairs of patients were included in the sequential anastomosis group [78 males and 52 females, aged 60 (52, 68) years] and simple anastomosis group [80 males and 50 females, aged 61 (52, 70) years]. The short- and mid-term clinical outcomes were compared.ResultsThe two propensity score-matched groups had similar baseline clinical data. No significant difference was found between sequential anastomosis and simple anastomosis groups in the in-hospital outcomes, including in-hospital death (1.5% vs. 1.5%, P=1.000), the incidence of complications (4.6% vs. 6.2%, P>0.05), and the mean flow of grafts (30.0±11.8 mL/min vs. 28.0±9.5 mL/min, P=0.597). The operation time of the sequential anastomosis group was shorter than that of the simple anastomosis group (142.5±21.2 min vs. 186.3±27.6 min, P<0.001). The drainage of the sequential anastomosis group was less than that of the simple anastomosis group (204.7±39.6 mL vs. 271.3±48.3 mL, P<0.001). The follow-up time was 12-60 (28.3±8.9) months, during which the mortality of the two groups was not statistically different (3.2% vs. 4.0%, P=0.796).ConclusionThe saphenous vein sequential anastomosis of saphenous vein is superior to the simple anastomosis. Sequential anastomosis technique can reduce aortic anastomosis, shorten operation time, and reduce bleeding drainage during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. The short- and mid- term clinical effects are satisfactory.
ObjectiveTo compare the postoperative chylothorax outcomes of robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), analyze the risk factors for postoperative chylothorax after minimally invasive radical lung cancer resection and explore possible prevention and control measures. MethodsBetween June 2012 and September 2020, 1083 patients underwent minimally invasive pulmonary lobectomy and systematic lymph node dissection in our hospital, including 578 males and 505 females with an average age of 60.6±9.4 years. Patients were divided into two groups according to the operation methods: a RATS group (499 patients) and a VATS group (584 patients). After propensity score matching, 434 patients were included in each group (868 patients in total). Chylothorax and other perioperative indicators were compared between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for postoperative chylothorax. ResultsOverall, 24 patients were diagnosed with chylothorax after surgery. Compared with the VATS group, the rate of chylothorax was higher (3.9% vs. 1.6%, P=0.038), the groups and numbers of dissected lymph nodes were more (both P<0.001), and the intraoperative blood loss was significantly less (P<0.001) in the RATS group. There was no statistical difference in the postoperative hospital stay (P=0.256) or chest tube drainage time (P=0.504) between the two groups. Univariate analysis showed that gender (P=0.021), operation approach (P=0.045), smoking (P=0.001) and the groups of dissected lymph nodes (P<0.001) were significantly associated with the development of chylothorax. Multivariate analysis showed that smoking [OR=4.344, 95%CI (1.149, 16.417), P=0.030] and the groups of dissected lymph nodes [OR=1.680, 95%CI (1.221, 2.311), P=0.001] were the independent risk factors for postoperative chylothorax. ConclusionCompared with the VATS, the rate of chylothorax after RATS is higher with more dissected lymph nodes and less blood loss. The incidence of chylothorax after minimally invasive radical lung cancer resection is higher in the patients with increased dissected lymph node groups and smoking history.
ObjectiveTo analyze and compare the perioperative efficacy difference between full-port Da Vinci robotic surgery and thoracoscopic surgery in patients with mediastinal tumor resection. MethodsThe data of 232 patients with mediastinal tumors treated by the same operator in the Department of Thoracic Surgery of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University were included. There were 103 (44.4%) males and 129 (55.6%) females, with an average age of 49.7 years. According to the surgical methods, they were divided into a robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) group (n=113) and a video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) group (n=119). After 1 : 1 propensity score matching, 57 patients in the RATS group and 57 patients in the VATS group were obtained. ResultsThe RATS group was better than the VATS group in the visual analogue scale pain score on the first day after the surgery [3.0 (2.0, 4.0) points vs. 4.0 (3.0, 5.0) points], postoperative hospital stay time [4.0 (3.0, 5.5) d vs. 6.0 (5.0, 7.0) d] and postoperative catheterization time [2.0 (2.0, 3.0) d vs. 3.0 (3.0, 4.0) d] (all P<0.05). There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications, postoperative thoracic closed drainage catheter placement rate or postoperative total drainage volume (all P>0.05). The total hospitalization costs [51 271.0 (44 166.0, 57 152.0) yuan vs. 35 814.0 (33 418.0, 39 312.0) yuan], operation costs [37 659.0 (32 217.0, 41 511.0) yuan vs. 19 640.0 (17 008.0, 21 421.0) yuan], anesthesia costs [3 307.0 (2 530.0, 3 823.0) yuan vs. 2 059.0 (1 577.0, 2 887.0) yuan] and drug and examination costs [9 241.0 (7 987.0, 12 332.0) yuan vs. 14 143.0 (11 620.0, 16 750.0) yuan] in the RATS group was higher than those in the VATS group (all P<0.05). ConclusionRobotic surgery and thoracoscopic surgery can be done safely and effectively. Compared with thoracoscopic surgery, robotic surgery has less postoperative pain, shorter tube-carrying time, and less postoperative hospital stay, which can significantly speed up the postoperative recovery of patients. However, the cost of robotic surgery is higher than that of thoracoscopic surgery, which increases the economic burden of patients and is also one of the main reasons for preventing the popularization of robotic surgery.