west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "radial head fracture" 2 results
  • TREATMENT OF DISPLACED RADIAL HEAD FRACTURES WITH INTERNAL FIXATION

    Objective To analyse the procedure and effectiveness of internal fixation in treatment of displaced radial head fractures. Methods Between August 2005 and May 2009, 35 patients with displaced radial head fractures underwent open reduction and internal fixation with SmartNail® and/or AO mini-plates. There were 28 males and 7 females with an average age of 28.4 years (range, 17-48 years). The injury mechanism included traffic accident in 16 patients, falling in 13, and falling from height in 6. According to Mason classification, 21 fractures were rated as type II, 9 as type III, and 5 as type IV. All fracturs were closed fractures. Six cases complicated by radial neck fractures, 1 case by olecranon fracture, 3 by posterior dislocations of the elbow, 1 by posterior dislocation of the elbow and coronoid process fracture, and 3 by medial collateral ligament injuries. The time from injury to operation was 3 to 7 days. Results Except 1 patient whose incision healed by second intention, healing of incision by first intention was achieved in the other patients. All patients were followed up 12-25 months with an average of 17 months. The average fracture healing time was 10.2 weeks (range, 8-16 weeks). At last follow-up, the average flexion and extension of the elbow was 119° (range, 95-145°). The average arc of forearm rotation was 126° (range, 90-175°). According to elbow functional evaluation criteria by Broberg and Morrey, the results were excellent in 18 cases, good in 13, and fair in 4; the excellent and good rate was 88.6%. Conclusion In treatment of displaced radial head fractures, open reduction and internal fixation can be performed with SmartNail® and/or AO mini-plates based on different fracture types and the short-term effectiveness is satisfactory.

    Release date:2016-08-31 05:45 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Study of characteristics and treatment of “kissing fracture” of humeroradial joint

    Objective To explore the clinical characteristics and treatment of “kissing fracture” of humeroradial joint. Methods A clinical data of 12 patients with “kissing fracture” of the humeroradial joint between January 2016 and June 2021 was retrospectively analyzed. There were 8 males and 4 females with an average age of 41.9 years (range, 15-75 years). The fractures caused by falling in 7 cases, by falling from height in 3 cases, and by sports in 2 cases. The time from injury to admission was 2-72 hours (median, 2 hours). According to Mason’s classification, the radial head fractures were rated as type Ⅰ in 2 cases, type Ⅱ in 8 cases, and type Ⅲ in 2 cases. According to Grantham’s classification, the humeral capitulum fractures were rated as type Ⅰ in 10 cases and type Ⅱ in 2 cases. Among them, 4 cases of Grantham type Ⅰ humeral capitulum fracture were missed by X-ray film and confirmed by CT and/or MRI. Four cases were complicated with other injuries of elbow joint. The radial head fractures were fixed with screws or mini plate in 11 cases and treated conservatively in 1 case; the humeral capitulum fractures were fixed with screw or plate in 9 cases, removed in 1 case, and treated conservatively in 2 cases. X-ray film was used to evaluate the fracture healing; Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) was used to evaluate the functional recovery of the affected limb, and the range of motion (ROM) of the elbow joint of the affected limb was detected. Results All the incisions healed by first intention without early complications. All patients were followed up 10-24 months, with an average of 15.2 months. X-ray films showed that all fractures healed, and the healing time was 2-3 months, with an average of 2.3 months. At last follow-up, the ROM of flexion-extension of the elbow joint was 65°-161°, with an average of 136.9°; the ROM of rotation was 70°-180°, with an average of 149.2°. MEPS ranged from 70 to 100, with an average of 87.4; 8 cases were excellent, 2 cases were good, and 2 cases were fair; the excellent and good rate was 83.3%. Conclusion The “kissing fracture” of the humeroradial joint is relatively rare, and the humeral capitulum fracture is milder than radial head fracture. X-ray examination alone can easily miss the diagnosis of Grantham type Ⅰ humeral capitulum fracture. The “kissing fracture” of the humeroradial joint is treated according to the principle of intra-articular fracture, and the good effectiveness can obtain.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content