Eight patients treated with modified radical mastectomy and fenestration of pectoralis muscle to preserve pectoral, nerves are reported and the practical procedure is introduced. The results indicate that this method can overcome the disadvantage of mastectomy (Auchincloss) in that only dissection of fatty tissue and lymph nodes in the lateral part of axilla is carried out. With fenestration of pectoralis major muscle, not only the pectoral nerves can be perserved but also the fatty tissue and lymph nodes, including of those medial to the pectoralis minor, subclavicular and interpectoral nodes can be dissected. This method almost reached Halsted’s demand and it can be used for stage Ⅰ-Ⅱ, and even stage Ⅲ breast cancer if no infiltration to pectoralis major muscle is found.
Objective To evaluate the value of extended latissimus dorsi flap (ELDF) in immediate breast reconstruction in patients with breast cancer after modified radical mastectomy. Methods Thirty-six patients with breast cancer who accepted modified radical mastectomy and 12 patients with breast cancer who accepted immediate breast reconstruction after modified radical mastectomy from January 2008 to June 2009 were included. The complications, cosmetical results and quality of life of these patients were compared. The shape of breast reconstruction was also evaluated. Results All of 12 patients succeeded in proceeding immediate breast reconstruction with ELDF. The evaluation of shape of breast reconstruction was good in 6 cases, secondary in 4 cases, and bad in 2 cases, which was beyond that in patients of radical operation group (Plt;0.001). There was no statistical difference in operation complications as hydrops, necrosis, affecting limb shoulder joint motion, drainage time, hospital stay, and starting time for adjuvant therapy between two groups (Pgt;0.05). The patients in breast reconstruction group had a better quality of life compared with the patients in radical operation group (Plt;0.001). In breast reconstruction group, 10 patients received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and no necrosis was showed in local flap grafting. After the follow-up of 2-17 months (median 8 months), no local recurrence and metastasis was demonstrated in two groups patients. Conclusions There are good cosmetic results after immediate breast reconstruction with ELDF, and it is easy to operate. It is a safe and feasible therapeutics method for early breast cancer.
ObjectiveTo compare the differences in preventing subcutaneous effusion, skin flap necrosis, and patient comfort between simple negative pressure drainage and negative pressure drainage combined with chest compression bandaging after radical mastectomy for breast cancer. MethodsOne hundred and ninety-six patients underwent radical mastectomy for breast cancer from January 2010 to December 2012 in this hospital were collected.The simple negative pressure drainage (SNPD group, n=84) and negative pressure drainage combined with chest compression bandaging (NPD+CB group, n=112) after radical mastectomy for breast cancer were used to prevent postoperative subcutaneous effusion.The postoperative complications, postoperative 3 d drainage volume, and patient comfort were compared in two groups. ResultsOne hundred and ninety-six patients with breast cancer were females.The differences of general clinical data were not statistically significant in two groups (P > 0.05).The differences of chest wall mean extubation time, axillary mean extubation time, postoperative 3 d mean drainage volume, and incidences of subcutaneous effusion and skin flap necrosis were not statistically significant in two groups (P > 0.05).The rate of comfort satisfactory in the SNPD group was significantly higher than that in the NPD+CB group [76.2%(16/84) versus 22.3%(25/112), P < 0.001].The chemotherapy was not affected after operation in two groups. ConclusionsComparing with negative pressure drainage combined with chest compression bandaging, simple negative pressure drainage do not increase postoperative subcutaneous effusion and skin flap necrosis, but it greatly improves the patients satisfactory rate.
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical efficacy of immediate breast reconstruction with extended latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap after nipple and areola sparing modified radical mastectomy for patients with early-middle breast cancer. MethodsSixty patients diagnosed with early-middle breast cancer by needle biopsy from November 2009 to October 2012 in this hospital were divided into two groups according to the surgical method.The breast reconstruction group (30 cases) were performed immediate breast reconstruction with extended latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap after nipple and areola sparing modified radical mastectomy, the control group (30 cases) were performed traditional modified radical mastectomy.The postoperative complications, clinical efficacy, quality of life, and recurrence and metastasis were compared in two groups. Results①The ipsilateral breast was completely missing in the control group.The aesthetic effect in the breast reconstruction group was satisfactory including excellent in 22 patients, good in 7 patients, general in 1 patient.②The rates of flaps effusion, flap necrosis, and affectied limb activity limitation had no significant differences in two groups (P > 0.05).The wound healing time, operation area drainage time, hospital stay, and post-operative chemotherapy start time all had no significant differences in two groups (P > 0.05).③The frequency of psycho-logical pressure (inferiority/anxiety/fear) and rate of un-satisfaction of secondary sexual characteristics (body/curve) in the breast reconstruction group were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.001).The rate of social interaction fitness in the breast reconstruction group was higher than that in the control group (P < 0.001).④The following-up time was 12 to 38 months with an average 25 months, one case died because of brain metastasis in the control group, the rest 59 patients had no local recurrence and distant metastasis. ConclusionsThe immediate breast reconstruction with exte-nded latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap after nipple and areola sparing modified radical mastectomy can cure cancer on the basis of satisfactory cosmetic results of breast, excellent quality of life of patients, and fewer surgical complica-tions.It does not affect postoperative adjuvant radiochemotherapy and short-and long-term efficacy for breast cancer.
ObjectiveTo investigate the value of ultrasound knife in modified radical mastectomy for remaining pectoral nerve and intercostobrachial nerve. MethodsOne hundred and sixty patients with breast cancer were divided into ultrasound knife group and electroscalpe group and then performed modified radical mastectomy with pectoral nerve and intercostobrachial nerve remainning. the pectoralis major thickness and paresthesia of skin of inner upper arm and axillary fossa were detected on the different time after operation. Results①The age, body mass index, and mean opera-tion time had no significant differences between these two groups (P > 0.05).②On 6 months after operation, the thickness of bilateral pectoralis major was not significantly different in the ultrasound knife group (P > 0.05), which of injuried pectoralis major was significantly thinner than that of uninjuried pectoralis major in the electroscalpe group (P < 0.05).③The rates of paresthesia of skin on postoperative 3 months and 6 months in the ultrasound knife group were signifi-cantly lower than those in the electroscalpe group (P < 0.05). ConclusionCompared with monopolar electro diathermy, the use of ultrasonic harmonic scalpel in modified radical mastectomy could better protect pectoral nerve and intercosto-brachial nerve, and thus decrease nerve parafunctional rate.
ObjectiveTo investigate effectiveness of the combination of serratus anterior muscle flap and breast implants for breast reconstruction after modified radical mastectomy.MethodsBetween January 2015 and December 2015, 25 female patients with breast cancer were enrolled, aged 24-62 years (mean, 40.6 years). The tumor located at left side in 9 cases and right side in 16 cases; 14 cases were in the left upper quadrant, 4 cases were in the left lower quadrant, 7 cases were on the top of the breast. All cases were invasive ductal carcinoma. According to TNM staging, 14 cases were at stageⅠand 11 cases were at stageⅡA. The diameter of lumps were all less than 3 cm. All those lumps were solitary and without distant metastasis. The sentinel nodes were all negative. After modified radical mastectomy, the breasts were reconstructed by serratus anterior muscle flap and breast implants. The nipples were spared in 22 cases.ResultsThe operation time was 113-148 minutes (mean, 136 minutes). All breasts survived and incisions healed at stageⅠ. There was no complication such as hematoma, infection, etc. All patients were followed up 6-18 months (mean, 15 months). Except 1 case, the others were evaluated according to the criteria of the reconstructed breast at 12 months after operation. Among them, 23 cases were evaluated as good and 1 case as fair. There was no tumor recurrence during the follow-up period.ConclusionThe combination of serratus anterior muscle flap and breast implants after the modified radical mastectomy is a handy approach of breast reconstruction which is less harmful with few postoperative complications. It also gains a high degree of satisfaction from patients for good breast shape.
Objective To explore the preventive effectiveness of early physiotherapy on arm lymphedema after modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer. Methods A total of 206 patients who underwent modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer in The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University from June 2014 to June 2016, enrolled in this randomized controlled clinical trial. Then these patients were randomly divided into intervention group and control group equally. Patients in the control group received routine treatment, and the patients in the intervention group began to use the air pressure pump combined with the microwave physiotherapy on the second day after the radical surgery. The incidences of limb lymphedema in 6 months and 1 year after operation between the 2 groups were compared, and the influencing factors of arm lymphedema were explored. Results The clinical data of 195 patients were analyzed at end, including 99 patients of the intervention group and 96 patients of the control group. ① There were statistical significance in the incidences of arm lymphedema in 6 months and 1 year after operation between the 2 groups (P<0.05), that incidences of arm lymphedema in the intervention group were both lower than those of the control group at the2 time points [6 months after operation: 2.0% (2/99)vs. 9.4% (9/96); 1 year after operation: 5.1% (5/99) vs. 17.7% (17/96)]. ② The results of non-conditional logistic regression analysis shown that, age (OR=1.45, P=0.008), tumor location (OR=1.72, P<0.001), TNM stage (OR=2.01, P=0.033), the number of invasive axillary lymph nodes (OR=1.15, P=0.005), and postoperative radiotherapy (OR=1.23, P=0.016) were the influencing factors of arm lymphedema after modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer, patients with age older than 60 years, tumor position at the outside area, stage Ⅲ of TNM, the number of invasive axillary lymph nodes >5, and patients received radiotherapy after operation had high risk of arm lymphedema. Conclusion Early physiotherapy can effectively prevent the occurrence of arm lymphedema after modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer, and early physiotherapy should be performed for patients with high risk of arm lymphedema.
ObjectiveTo summarize the treatment measures and experience for one patient with acute pulmonary thromboembolism after modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer. MethodsThe discussion on MDT (multi-disciplinary team) of a breast cancer patient admitted to The First Hospital of Lanzhou University in March 2018 and the results of the discussion on acute pulmonary thromboembolism after operation were summarized. ResultsThis patient had many high risk factors for deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremities, such as obesity, advanced age, hypertension, malignant tumor, and surgical stress. The operative time was about 90 min and the blood loss was 30 mL, without nerve and vascular injuries. Acute pulmonary thromboembolism occurred suddenly on 10 days after operation, which led to heart failure. Eventually, the patient died of the peripheral circulatory insufficiency caused by respiratory failure and heart failure. ConclusionSurgeons should pay great attention to the perioperative management of the patients with many high-risk factors, who may occur acute pulmonary thromboembolism caused by deep venous thrombosis of lower limbs after radical mastectomy.
ObjectiveTo investigate the prognosis after breast conserving surgery (BCS) and modified radical mastectomy (MRM) in patients with stage Ⅰ–Ⅱ breast cancer, and analyze the factors related to locoregional recurrence (LRR).MethodsThe clinicopathologic and prognostic data of patients with stage Ⅰ–Ⅱ breast cancer who underwent the surgical treatment in the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from January 2011 to December 2014 were analyzed. The clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic differences of the BCS group and MRM group were compared. The factors related to LRR of patients underwent the BCS and MRM were analyzed.ResultsA total of 1 330 patients with stage Ⅰ–Ⅱ breast cancer were included in this study, including 230 in the BCS group and 1 100 in the MRM group. Compared with the MRM group, the patients in the BCS group had higher height (P<0.001), younger age (P<0.001), smaller tumor diameter (P<0.001), and less axillary lymph node metastasis (P<0.001). Up to August 2019, 149 cases (18 cases in the BCS group and 131 cases in the MRM group) were lost, with a follow-up rate of 88.8%. The median follow-up time was 71 months (4－103 months). The LRR rate of the BCS group was higher than that of the MRM group (6.1% versus 2.5%, χ2=7.002, P<0.01). The locoregional recurrence-free survival of the MRM group was better than that of the BCS group (χ2=7.886, P<0.01). However, there were no statistical differences between the two groups in terms of the distant metastasis-free survival and disease-free survival (P>0.05). In the patients underwent the BCS, the HER-2 was associated with the LRR (P<0.05), and the axillary lymph node metastasis was associated with the LRR in the patients underwent the MRM (P<0.05).ConclusionsAccording to results of this study, although there is a significant difference in locoregional recurrence-free survival between BCS group and MRM group in patients with stage Ⅰ–Ⅱ breast cancer, there are no statistical differences in distant metastasis-free survival and disease-free survival between the two groups. Therefore, it is safe and feasible for choosing appropriate patients with stage Ⅰ–Ⅱ breast cancer to underwent breast-conserving treatment.
ObjectiveTo investigate the anatomy and function of pectoralis fascia in breast cancer operation, and the choice of resection and preservation of pectoralis fascia in different operation methods.MethodWe searched the articles related to pectoralis fascia and breast cancer through PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO, WanFang Medical Network, SinoMed, and other databases, and then selected the Chinese and foreign articles that met the objective of this paper, and made an review after reading the articles.ResultsIn the immediate breast reconstruction of breast prosthesis after breast cancer operation, the preservation of pectoralis fascia was beneficial to the complete coverage of breast prosthesis and improved the cosmetic effect after operation. The purpose of preserving pectoralis fascia adipose tissue in breast-conserving surgery was to reduce the loss of breast volume and to pursue the cosmetic effect after operation. At present, there had been reports on the safety of pectoralis fascia oncology, but there was no final conclusion on the safe distance between tumor and pectoralis fascia, and the current research could not provide sufficient evidence for the preservation of pectoralis fascia.ConclusionsThe question of whether the pectoralis fascia needs to be removed in breast cancer surgery is still controversial. The preservation of pectoralis fascia is more for better immediate breast reconstruction after operation. However, the current evidence of evidence-based medicine is not sufficient. Clinicians need to conduct multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trials to improve the evidence.